Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2020, 68(2), 311-322 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun202068020311

Trends in Predictive and Proactive Maintenance of Motor Vehicles

Jan Furch, Zdenìk Krobot
Department of Combat and Special Vehicles, Faculty of Military Technology, University of Defence, Kounicova 65, 662 10 Brno, Czech Republic

Changes in maintenance approaches of more complex vehicles and related systems are closely associated with the development of motor vehicles and the ever increasing demand for mobility. Ever since the production of the first motorized vehicles started, engineers have been addressing maintenance issues, which aim to maximize the reliability of vehicles and eliminate unwanted failures. The purpose of this article is to show how proactive maintenance can be performed. Proactive maintenance is based on on-line diagnostic systems in motor vehicles. In this paper, the authors describe the possibilities of obtaining operational data on automatic transmission from on-board diagnostics and its subsequent processing. Furthermore, the article presents a model proposed for determining the amount of wear of individual machine parts in an automatic transmission. Finally, a comparison of the data from the proposed model and the data from the CAN bus is made. The authors show the possibility of access in the field of sustainability towards proactive maintenance and the effort to predict future wear of machine parts in an automatic transmission using modelling. In this case, Matlab & Simulink software was used, which is suitable for these processes. This approach to the sustainability of motor vehicles is in principle identical or very similar to the systems used under various designations in industry, aviation, computer science, etc.

Keywords: proactive maintenance, simulation of automotive gearbox, prognostics, condition based maintenance, prognostics methods
Grants and funding:

The presented work has been prepared with the support of the Ministry of Defence of the Czech Republic, Partial Project for Institutional Development, Department of Combat and Special Vehicles, University of Defence, Brno.

Received: November 13, 2019; Accepted: February 18, 2020; Published: April 29, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Furch, J., & Krobot, Z. (2020). Trends in Predictive and Proactive Maintenance of Motor Vehicles. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis68(2), 311-322. doi: 10.11118/actaun202068020311
Download citation

References

  1. BLANN, D. R. 2003. Reliability as a strategic initiative: To improve manufacturing. Asset Management & Maintenance Journal, 16(2): 57-68.
  2. BOX, G. E., JENKINS, G. M., REINSEL, G. C. and LJUNG, G. M. 2015. Time series analysis: forecasting and control. 1st Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  3. DAIGLE, M. and GOEBEL, K. 2010. Model-based prognostics under limited sensing. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference. 6-13 March, Big Sky, MT, USA, pp. 1-12. Go to original source...
  4. DAVIS, M. H. 1993. Markov Models and Optimization. 1st Edition. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC. Go to original source...
  5. DIEULLE, L., BÉRENGUER, C., GRALL, A. and ROUSSIGNOL, M. 2003. Sequential condition-based maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system. European Journal of Operational Research, 150(2): 451-461. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00593-3 Go to original source...
  6. ENGEL, S. J., GILMARTIN, B. J., BONGORT, K. and HESS, A. 2000. Prognostics, the real issues involved with predicting life remaining. In: 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 25 March 2000, Big Sky, MT, USA, pp. 457-469.
  7. FURCH, J., KROBOT, Z. and TURO, T. 2017. Using Telemetry for Maintenance of Special Military Vehicles. In: MAZAL, J. (Ed.). Modelling and Simulation for Autonomous Systems. MESAS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10756. Cham: Springer. Go to original source...
  8. FURCH, J. and NGUYEN, T. T. 2016. Proactive Maintenance System of Land Vehicles. In: 20th International conference Transport Means 2016. 5-7 October, Prague, pp. 27-33.
  9. GUAN, X., JHA, R. and LIU, Y. 2009. Probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis using maximum entropy approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(2): 163-171. DOI: 10.1007/s10845-009-0341-3 Go to original source...
  10. HUYNH, K., CASTRO, I., BARROS, A. and BÉRENGUER, C. 2012. Modeling systems maintenance strategies with minimal repairs for competing failure modes due to degradation and shocks. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(1): 140-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.025 Go to original source...
  11. CHOVANEC, A. 2012. Analysing and modelling off-road vehicle availability. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Transport Mean, 25-27 October, Kaunas, pp. 54-57.
  12. INMAN, D. J., FARRAR, C. R., JUNIOR, V. L. and JUNIOR, V. S. 2005. Damage Prognosis: For Aerospace, Civil and Mechanical Systems. 1st Editon. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Go to original source...
  13. JACOBSEN, M. 2006. Point Process Theory and Applications, Marked Point and Piecewise Deterministic Processes. 1st Edition. Boston: Birkhäuser.
  14. JARDINE, A. K., LIN, D. and BANJEVIC, D. 2006. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7): 1438-1510. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012 Go to original source...
  15. LEITNER, B. and FIGULI, L. 2018. Fatigue life prediction of mechanical structures under stochastic loading. MATEC Web of Conferences, 157: 02024. Go to original source...
  16. LENNART, L. 1999. System identification: theory for the user. 2nd Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  17. LEWIS, F. W., JAGANNATHAN, S. and YESILDIRAK, A. 1999. Neural network control of robot manipulators and nonlinear systems. 1st Edition. London: Taylor & Francis.
  18. LIU, S. and MOU, L. 2012. Hydrodynamic lubrication of thrust bearings with rectangular fixed-incline-pads. Journal of Tribology, 134(2): 024503. DOI: 10.1115/1.4006022 Go to original source...
  19. MAKRIDAKIS, S., WHEELWRIGHT, S. C. and HYNDMAN, R. J. 2008. Forecasting methods and applications. 4th Edition. Ney Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  20. NOVOTNÝ, P., HRABOVSKÝ, J., JURAÈKA, J. and KLÍMA, J. 2019. Effective thrust bearing model for simulations of transient rotor dynamics. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 157-158(1): 374-383. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.04.057 Go to original source...
  21. ORCHARD, M., WU, B. and VACHTSEVANOS, G. 2005. A particle filtering framework for failure prognosis. In: Proceedings of the World Tribology Congress III. 12-16 September, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 883-884. Go to original source...
  22. ROJAS, I. et al. 2008. Soft-computing techniques and ARMA model for time series prediction. Neurocomputing, 71(4-6): 519-537. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2007.07.018 Go to original source...
  23. SAXENA, A., CELAYA, J., SAHA, B. and GOEBEL, K. 2010. Metrics for offline evaluation of prognostics performance. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 1(1): 4-23. Go to original source...
  24. STACHOWIAK, G. and BATCHELOR, A. W. 2013. Engineering tribology. 4th Edition. Oxford: Elsevier.
  25. STIGLER, S. M. 1989. Galton's account of the invention of correlation. Statistical Science, 4(2): 73-79. DOI: 10.1214/ss/1177012580 Go to original source...
  26. TAKATA, S. et al. 2004. Maintenance: Changing role in life cycle management. CIRP annals, 53(2): 643-655. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60033-X Go to original source...
  27. TOMASZEK, H., JASZTAL, M. and ZIEJA, M. 2013. Application of the Paris formula with m = 2 and the variable load spectrum to a simplified method for evaluation of reliability and fatigue life demonstrated by aircraft components.. Eksploatacja i Niezawodno¶æ, 15(4): 297-303.
  28. VACHTSEVANOS, G. et al. 2006. Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems. 1st Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons. Go to original source...
  29. VAN HOUTEN, F. J., TOMIYAMA, T. and SALAMONS, O. W. 1998. Product modelling for model-based maintenance. CIRP annals, 47(1): 123-128. DOI: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62800-5 Go to original source...
  30. VOISIN, A., LEVRAT, E., COCHETEUX, P. and LUNG, B. 2010. Generic prognosis model for proactive maintenance decision support: application to pre-industrial e-maintenance test bed. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 21(2): 177-193. DOI: 10.1007/s10845-008-0196-z Go to original source...
  31. WANG, W. Q., GOLNARAGHI, M. F. and ISMAIL, F. 2004. Prognosis of machine health condition using neuro-fuzzy systems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 18(4): 813-831. DOI: 10.1016/S0888-3270(03)00079-7 Go to original source...
  32. WEIBULL, W. 1951. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. Journal of applied mechanics, 18(3): 293-297. Go to original source...
  33. YAN, J., KOC, M. and LEE, J. 2007. A prognostic algorithm for machine performance assessment and its application. Production Planning and Control, 15(8): 796-801. DOI: 10.1080/09537280412331309208 Go to original source...
  34. YU, G., QIU, H., DJURDJANOVIC, D. and LEE, J. 2006. Feature signature prediction of a boring process using neural network modeling with confidence bounds. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 30(7-8): 614-621. DOI: 10.1007/s00170-005-0114-x Go to original source...
  35. ZEMOURI, R., RACOCEANU, D. and ZERHOUNI, N. 2003. Recurrent radial basis function network for time-series prediction. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 16(5-6): 453-463. DOI: 10.1016/S0952-1976(03)00063-0 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.