Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(5), 1769-1777 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563051769

Do the Czech Local Action Groups Respect the LEADER Method?

Hana Svobodová
Department of Geography, Faculty of Education, Masaryk University, ®erotínovo nám. 9, 601 77 Brno, Czech Republic

The article introduces activities of local action groups (LAGs) in the Czech Republic. Attention is focused on the history of LAGs, evaluation of LAGs' activities in the 2007-2013 period and preparation for the 2014-2020 period. Although this period has already started, drawing on subsidies is still lagging behind. Evaluation of LAGs is based on a questionnaire survey among LAGs, information on grants from "Axis 4 - Leader" of Rural Development Programme for the period 2007-2013, content analysis of several Strategies of Community Led Local Development prepared for the current programming period and experience from the creation of several Strategies. The paper also identifies problems of the LAGs (not only in the Czech Republic) and suggestions how to avoid them in the recent programming period.

Keywords: rural development, integrated approach, community led local development, local action group, strategy, programming period 2014-2020, Czech Republic

Prepublished online: October 29, 2015; Published: December 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Svobodová, H. (2015). Do the Czech Local Action Groups Respect the LEADER Method? Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis63(5), 1769-1777. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563051769
Download citation

References

  1. BINEK, J., OPRAVIL, Z., CHMELAŘ, R. and SVOBODOVÁ, H. 2015. Cooperation and Mutual Relationships of Cities and their Hinterland with Regard to Functioning of the EU Integrated Development Instruments. Quaestiones Geographicae, in print. Go to original source...
  2. BUDZICH-SZUKAŁA, U. 2013. A new approach to local development in programming EU funds-experience from the past and challenges for the future. [Online]. In: New Paradigm in Action, 116-138. Available at: http://www.mir.gov.pl/english/Regional_Development/Regional_Policy/NSRD/doc_str/Documents/MRD_NPA_on_successful_partnerships.pdf#page=117/. [Accessed: 2015, January 10].
  3. COFFEY, W. J. and POLČSE, M. 1984. The Concept of Local Development: A Stages Model of Endogenous Regional Growth. Papers in Regional Science, 55: 1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1984.tb00823.x. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1984.tb00823.x Go to original source...
  4. COFFEY, W. J. and POLČSE, M. 1985. Local development: Conceptual bases and policy implications. Regional Studies, 19(2): 85-93. doi: 10.1080/09595238500185101. DOI: 10.1080/09595238500185101 Go to original source...
  5. ČEPELKA, O. 2001. Iniciativa Evropské unie LEADER pro rozvoj venkova. Praha: Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR.
  6. ČEPELKA, O. 2008. Místní akční skupiny v ČR v roce pět. Liberec: Tima Liberec.
  7. ČEPELKA, O. et al. 2004. Místní partnerství a rozvoj venkova (příprava na iniciativu LEADER). Liberec: Omega
  8. HERBERT-CHESHIRE, L. and HIGGINS, V. 2004. From risky to responsible: expert knowledge and the governing of community-led rural development. Journal of Rural Studies, 20: 289-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.10.006 Go to original source...
  9. KONEČNÝ, O. 2013. Multifunkcionalita: geografie, venkov, zemědělství. In: Výroční konference České geografické společnosti: Nové výzvy pro geografii. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 182-189.
  10. LO©«ÁK, M. and HUDEČKOVÁ H. 2010. Preliminary impacts of the LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 56: 249-265. Go to original source...
  11. MACKEN-WALSH, A. 2011. Partnership and subsidiarity? A casestudy of farmers' participation in contemporary EU governance and rural development initiatives. Rural Society, 21: 43-53. DOI: 10.5172/rsj.2011.21.1.43 Go to original source...
  12. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC. ©2014. Hodnocení místních akčních skupin. [Online]. Available at: http://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/dotace/program-rozvoje-venkova-na-obdobi-2007/opatreni-osy-iv/mistni-akcni-skupina/hodnoceni-mistnich-akcnich-skupin-2012.html. [Accessed: 2015, March 14].
  13. MOSELEY, J. M. (ed.). 2003. Local Partnerships for Rural Development: The European Experience. Oxon: CABI Publishing.
  14. MUELLER, R. 2003/2004. Community Development Process in a Low-income Country Like Nepal. IUC Journal of Social Work. Theory & Practice, 2003/2004(7). [Online]. Available at: https://www.bemidjistate.edu/academics/publications/social_work_journal/issue07/articles/Comm_devel.htm. [Accessed: 2014, November 12].
  15. NEVĚDĚL, L. and HORÁK, M. 2015. Operation of the Selected Local Action Group. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1): 347-352. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563010347 Go to original source...
  16. OECD. 2006. The New Rural Paradigm - Policies and Governance. OECD Rural Policy Reviews, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  17. PAVLÍKOVÁ, G. 2008. Místní akční skupiny (MAS) a jejich činnost na venkově. In: MAJEROVÁ, V. et al., Český venkov 2008, Proměny venkova. Praha: PEF ČZU.
  18. PECHROVÁ, M. and BOUKALOVÁ, K. 2015. Differences among Czech Local Action Groups in Using Selected Principles of LEADER. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 46(1): 41-48. DOI: 10.1515/sab-2015-0015 Go to original source...
  19. PELCL, P., HAVRÁNEK, T., LEHMANNOVÁ, A. and MARTÍNEK, J. 2008. Metodika dobré praxe místních akčních skupin v České republice. Plzeň: CPKP.
  20. PIKE, A., RODRIGUEZ-POSE, A. and TOMANEY, J. 2006. Local and Regional Development. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
  21. EVROPSKÉ SPOLEČENSTVÍ. ©2006. Přístup Leader: Základní příručka. Lucemburk: Úřad pro úřední tisky evropských společenství.
  22. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. 2013. Regulation (EU) No. 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No. 1698/2005. Official Journal of the European Union, L347-L548.
  23. ROČKOVÁ, L. 2011. Existence učících se regionů v dimenzi ČR. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Pardubice: University of Pardubice.
  24. SHUCKSMITH, M., THOMSON, J. K. and ROBERTS, D. 2005. The LEADER community iniciative. In: The CAP and the regions: the territorial impact of the common agricultural policy. Oxfordshire: CABI Publishing, 106-110. Go to original source...
  25. SCHILLER, H. 2008. Networks of Local Action Groups in Rural Areas: The Example of the Eu Initiative Broads and Rivers Leader+. VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller e. K.
  26. STÁTNÍ ZEMĚDĚLSKÝ INTERVENČNÍ FOND. ©2014. Státní zemědělský intervenční fond. [Online]. Available at: www.szif.cz. [Accessed: 2015, January 12].
  27. SVOBODOVÁ, H. 2010. Realita postavení místních akčních skupin v rozvoji venkova České republiky - cíle, aktivity, bariéry - pohledem geografa v praxi. In: Sborník XXII. sjezdu České geografické společnosti. Ostrava.
  28. WOKOUN, R. 2008. Regionální rozvoj. Východiska regionálního rozvoje, regionální politika, teorie, strategie a programování. Praha: Linde.
  29. WOODS, M. 2005. Rural Geography: Processes, Responses and Experiences in Rural Restructuring. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.