Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(5), 1687-1695 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563051687

Enterprise Content Management Implementation and Risk

Jaroslava Klegová, Ivana Rábová
Department of Informatics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solutions are commonly used in many areas such as document management, record management, digital asset management, etc. Key features of ECM systems are capturing, indexing, preserving and retrieving of digital information. The state-of-the-art ECM solution can help revolutionize document management and further automated business processes which can lead to better decisions and competitive advantage.
Risk management can reduce project failure and that is why controlling risk in ECM implementation projects is considered to be a major contributor to project success. To manage software risk, the first step is to identify a list of ECM projects' risks. The present paper provides an overview of ECM implementation risks and contains findings from a small survey on experience of ECM implementation and risk in Czech enterprises. Risk of implementation in the public sector is discussed more deeply with case study examples.

Keywords: Enterprise Content Management, risk

Prepublished online: October 29, 2015; Published: December 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Klegová, J., & Rábová, I. (2015). Enterprise Content Management Implementation and Risk. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(5), 1687-1695. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563051687
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BASL, J. and BLAŽÍČEK, R. 2008. Podnikové informační systémy: podnik v informační společnosti. 2nd edition. Praha: Grada Publishing.
    2. BENTLY, K. and YOONG, P. 2000. Knowledge work and telework: an exploratory study. Internet Research. Electronic Networking applications and Policy, 10(4): 346-356. DOI: 10.1108/10662240010342658 Go to original source...
    3. DILNUTT, R. and BETHWEY, W. 2005. Enterprise Content Management: Supporting Knowledge Management Capability. International Journal for Knowledge Culture and Change Management, 5(8): 73-84. DOI: 10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v05i08/50146 Go to original source...
    4. GRAHLMANN, K., HILHORST, C., SANDER, A. et al. 2010. Impacts of implementing Enterprise Content Management Systems. ECIS, 103.
    5. GRAHLMANN, K. R., HELMS, R. W., HILHORST, C. et al. 2012. Reviewing Enterprise Content Management: a functional framework. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(3): 268-286. DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2011.41 Go to original source...
    6. CHARETTE, R. N. 2005. Why software fails? IEEE Spectrum, 42(9): 42-49. DOI: 10.1109/MSPEC.2005.1502528 Go to original source...
    7. KEIL, M., CULE, E. P., LYYTINEN, K. et al. 1998. A framework for identifying software project risks. Communications of the ACM, 41(11): 765-783. DOI: 10.1145/287831.287843 Go to original source...
    8. KUNSTOVÁ, R. 2009. Efektivní správa dokumentů: Co nabízí Enterprise Content Management. 1st edition. Praha: Grada Publishing.
    9. KUNSTOVÁ, R. 2010. Barriers and benefits of investments into enterprise content management systems. Journal of Management, Informatics and Human Resources, 43(5): 205-213. Go to original source...
    10. SIMISTER, S. J. 2004. Qualitative and quantitative risk management. [Online]. The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470172391.ch2/summary. [Accessed: 2014, August 1]. Go to original source...
    11. TAYLOR, B. J. 2006. Risk management paradigms in health and social services for professional decision making on the long-term care of older people. British Journal of Social Work, 36(8): 1411-29. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bch406 Go to original source...
    12. THE AGIMO. 2008. Implementing a content management system. [Online]. Available at: http://agimo.gov.au/. [Accessed: 2014, August 1].
    13. VOHRADSKY, D. 2012. Cloud Risk: 10 Principles and a Framework. ISACA Journal 5(11). [Online]. Available at: https://www.isaca.org. [Accessed: 2014, August 1].
    14. WALLACE, L., KEIL, M. and RAIL, A. 2004. How software project risk affects project performance: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sciences, 35(2): 33. DOI: 10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02059.x Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content