Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(5), 1493-1497 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563051493

Risk Analysis at Work in Manufacturing Organization

Maroš Korenko1, Marián Bujna1, Daniela Földešiová1, Petr Dostál2, Peter Kyselica1
1 Department of Quality and Engineering Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovak Republic
2 Department of Technology and Automobile Transport, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Risk is virtually present everywhere around us. Nowadays, there is an increasing focus on safety at work; therefore, the organizations that want to be successful in the market try to eliminate risk factors to a minimum to avoid or prevent the health hazard of employees, damages to property or the environment. The work is focused on the risk assessment of a selected device, which is the most risky workplace according to the organization where the research was conducted. In the practical part, we became familiar with the equipment for welding and a thorough analysis of the current state of safety by a complex method was done. Consequently, corrective actions to reduce risk to an acceptable level were proposed. After that, we reassessed the risks of complex method, and the point method was used to verify the effectiveness of proposed remedial measures.

Keywords: risk assessment, health and safety, risk management, level of safety
Grants and funding:

Supported by the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic, project KEGA No. 035SPU-4/2014 'Integrating innovative trends in metal machining, metrology and quality management in university studies'. The research has been supported by the project IP 10/2015 "Degradation properties of welded joints"financed by IGA AF MENDELU.

Prepublished online: October 29, 2015; Published: December 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Korenko, M., Bujna, M., Földešiová, D., Dostál, P., & Kyselica, P. (2015). Risk Analysis at Work in Manufacturing Organization. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(5), 1493-1497. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563051493
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AVEN, T. 2009. Safety is the antonym of risk for some perspectives of risk. Safety Science, 47(7): 925-930. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.001 Go to original source...
    2. BACSKOR, M. 2013. Kaizen a jeho možnosti využitia vo výrobnej organizácii. In: Najnovšie trendy v poľnohospodárstve. v strojárstve a v odpadovom hospodárstve. Nitra.
    3. HNILICA, J., FOTR, J. 2009. Aplikovaná analýza rizika. Praha.
    4. HRUBEC, J., PRÍSTAVKA, M. 2011. Quality Management System in the Educational Process, Quality, Technological Improvement. Trnava.
    5. KADNÁR, M. 2011. The design and verification of experimental machine for real journal bearing testing. Technički vjestnik, 18(1): 95-98.
    6. KADNÁR, M., RUSNÁK, J., KUČERA, M. 2007. Analýza kritických frekvencií pri skúškach na skúšobnom stroji Tribotestor. Acta Technologica Agriculturae, 10(3-4): 66-69.
    7. KIELBASA, P., SZELAG, T. 2013. Ergonomic evaluation of acoustic environment in the livestock building converted for industrial purposes. Inżynieria Rolnicza, 4(2): 281-290.
    8. KORENKOVÁ, M. 2012. Approaches of managers to solving the conflicts at the place of work. Journal on Law, Economy and Management, 2(2): 56-60.
    9. KORENKOVÁ, M. 2008. Podnikanie a manažment. Nitra: UKF v Nitre.
    10. KOWALSKI, J. 2012. Factors supporting the use of technical means and production efficiency in peasant holdings. Kraków: Polish Society of Agricultural Enginnering.
    11. KOUDELKA, C., VRÁNA, V. 2006. Rizika a jejich analýza. [online]. Available at: http://fei1.vsb.cz/kat420/rizika/web/RIZIKA.pdf.
    12. MARHAVALIS, P. 2011. Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000-2009. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24(5): 477-523. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.03.004 Go to original source...
    13. MERNA, T., AL-THANI, F. F. 2007. Risk management. Praha.
    14. PAČAIOVÁ, H. 2003. Posudzovanie rizík -porovnanie definícií, metód a postupov. Bezpečná práca, 34(3): 11-17.
    15. PAČAIOVÁ, H., NAMEŠANSKÁ, J. 2010. Porovnanie kľúčových ukazovateľov výkonnosti v oblasti riadenia údržby, bezpečnosti a kvality. Bezpečná práca, 41(6): 9-11.
    16. PRÍSTAVKA, M., BELOEV, H., KROČKO, V. 2014. Quality Control in Production Processes. Ruse: Angel Kanchev University of Ruse.
    17. PRÍSTAVKA, M., HRUBEC, J. 2013. Riadenie kvality vo výrobnej organizácii. Nitra: SUA in Nitra.
    18. PRÍSTAVKA, M., HRUBEC, J. 2009. Capability of lathe-turning process of a body for gear box. In: Production Engineering. Novosibirsk State Technical University.
    19. SAVOV, R. 2013. Využitie kritérií MBNQA v hodnotení manažmentu kvality v agropodnikateľských subjektoch SR. Trendy v podnikání, 3(4): 26-34.
    20. SINAY, J. 1997. Riziká technických zariadení. Košice.
    21. VIŠNOVSKÝ, J., KORENKOVÁ, M. 2004. Possible approaches to the solution of conflict situation in managerial practice. Agricultural Economics, 50(1): 477-523. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content