Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2014, 62(5), 1071-1078 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462051071
Effects of Different Soil Tillage Intensity on Yields of Spring Barley
- 1 Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- 2 Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507/73, 161 06 Praha 6-Ruzyně, Czech Republic
Within the period 1990-2012, effects of different soil tillage intensity on yields of spring barley were studied in a field experiment in the sugar-beet producing region (Ivanovice na Hané, Czech Republic). The forecrop of the spring barley was always sugar beet; following in three different crop rotations, after maize for silage, winter wheat and spring barley. Four variants of tillage were evaluated: Variant 1 - ploughing to the depth of 0.22 m; Variant 2 - shallow ploughing to the depth of 0.15 m; Variant 3 - no tillage; Variant 4 - shallow loosening soil to the depth of 0.10 m.
Effect of different tillage on yields of spring barley was statistically insignificant. In all three crop rotations, the highest and the lowest average yields were obtained in Variant 2 (ploughing to the depth of 0.15 m) and Variant 1 (ploughing to the depth of 0.22 m), respectively. Average yields in variants of soil tillage were these: variant 1 - 6.42 t.ha-1; variant 2 - 6.57 t.ha-1, variant 3 - 6.53 t.ha-1, variant 4 - 6.50 t.ha-1. The obtained results indicate that in these pedo-climatic conditions reduction of intensity soil tillage represented a very suitable alternative in case of growing spring barley after sugar beet as compared with the conventional method of tillage by ploughing to the depth of 0.22 m.
Keywords: spring barley, methods of tillage, grain yield
Grants and funding:
This article was written with the financial support by the project grant agency NAZV [No. QJ1210008] "Innovation of systems cereal growing in different agro-ecological conditions of the Czech Republic" and project grant agency TAČR [No. TA02010669] "Research and development of machines and technologies for differentiated tillage and fertilization."
Published: December 2, 2014 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- ARSHAD, M. A., 1999. Tillage practices for suistainable agriculture and environmental quality in different agroecosystems. Soil & Tillage Research, 53: 1-3. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00071-9
Go to original source...
- BABU, R., NAIR, S. K., PRASANNA, B. M., GUPTA, H. S. 2004. Integrating marker-assisted selection in crop breeding-prospects and challenges. Curr Sci., 87(5): 607-619.
- HOSSAIN, A., LOZOVSKAYA, M. V., ZVOLINSKY, V. P., TUTUMA, N. V. 2012a. Effect of soil resources and climatic factors (temperature) on spring wheat and barley in the northern Bangladesh and southern Russia. In: International scientific and practical conference on problems of environmental management and con-servation of ecological balance in the arid zones. Salt Zaymische, Russia: Caspian Scientific Research Institute of Arid Agriculture, 16-18 May.
- HŮLA, J., PROCHÁZKOVÁ, B. et al. 2008. Minimalizace zpracování půdy. Praha: Profi Press, s. r. o.
- HŮLA, J. et al. 2010. Dopad netradičních technologií zpracování půdy na půdní prostředí. Uplatněná certifikovaná metodika. Praha: Výzkumný ústav zemědělské techniky, v.v.i.
- HRUBÝ, J., PROCHÁZKOVÁ, B. 2000. Zásady zpracovní půdy a setí obilovin. Agromagazín, 1: 13-15.
- KÖLLER, K., LINKE, CH. 2006. Úspěch bez pluhu. Praha: Vydavatelství ZT.
- PIDGEON, J. D. 1980. A preliminary study of minimum tillage systems (including broadcasting) for spring barley in Scotland. In: ICI Plant Protection Division, Fernhurst, Haslemere, Surrey GU27 3 JE. Great Britain.
Go to original source...
- PROCHÁZKOVÁ, B., DOVRTĚL, J., HŮLA, J. 2004. Minimalizační technologie zpracování půdy k obilninám. Úroda, 52(2): 46-49.
- PROCHÁZKOVÁ, B. et al. 2011. Minimalizační technologie zpracování půdy a možnosti jejich využití při ochraně půdy a krajiny. Uplatněná certifikovaná metodika. Brno: Mendelova univerzita v Brně.
- RICHTER, R., HLUŠEK, J. 2003. Půdní úrodnost. 2. upr. vyd., Praha: Ústav zemědělských a potravinářských informací.
- ROTREKL, J. et al. 2001. Nové systémy zakládání a ochrany vybraných plodin. Zemědělské informace 17. Praha: ÚZPI.
- SUŠKEVIČ, M. 1994. Dlouhodobé působení minimálního zpracování půdy k jarnímu ječmeni a ozimé pšenici na výnosy a výrobnost osevního postupu. Rostl. Výr., 40(9): 817-823.
- ŠARAPATKA, B. et al. 2010. Agroekologie: východiska pro udržitelné zemědělské hospodaření. Olomouc: Bioinstitut.
- TORRESEN, K. S., SKUTTERUD, R., WEISETH, L., TANDSARTHER, H. J., JONSEN, S. H. 1999. Plant protection in spring cereal production with reduced tillage. I. Grain yield and weed development. Crop-Protec, 18(9): 595-603. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-2194(99)00067-8
Go to original source...
- XIAO, Y., WEI, K., CHEN, J., ZHOU, M., ZHANG, G. 2007. Genotypic difference in growth inhibition and yield loss in barley under waterlogging stress. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. (Agric & Life Sci), 33(5):525-532.
- ZIMOLKA, J. et al. 2006. Ječmen - formy a užitkové směry v ČR. Praha: Profi Press, s. r. o.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.