Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2014, 62(5), 1049-1056 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462051049

Stability Analysis of Durum Wheat Genotypes by Regression Parameteres in Dryland Conditions

Mohtasham Mohammadi1, Peyman Sharifi2, Rahmatollah Karimizadeh1
1 Dryland Agricultural Research Institute, Gachsaran Station, Iran
2 Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University , Rasht , Iran

The objectives of this study were to estimate genotype × environment (GE) interaction effects and to determine the stable durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum Desf.) genotypes for grain yield in warm winter areas of Iran. Twenty durum wheat genotypes, including 18 experimental lines and two local checks were evaluated during three cropping seasons (2004-2006) at five research sites. The combined analysis of variance indicated that the main effects of location and genotype and interaction effects of genotype × year, genotype × location and genotype × year × location were highly significant for grain yield. GE interaction was analyzed using linear regression techniques. There was considerable variation for grain yield among both genotypes and environments. Stability was estimated using the Eberhart and Russell method. Stability analysis of grain yield in different environments showed that the variance of genotypes and genotypes × environment (linear) interactions were significant. Due to the stability analysis, genotype 12 (D68-1-93A-1A//Ruff/Fg/3/Mtl-5/4/Lahn) indicated relatively minimum value for S2d and a b-value close to unity and hence, it may be considered stable for grain yield in all of the environments. The results showed that G10 (Bcr//Memo/goo) also favor for its stability in high yielding environments. The broad sense heritability was 77%, indicating selection should give a good response for grain yield.

Keywords: Durum wheat, grain yield, stability, genotype × environment (GE) interaction, heritability
Grants and funding:

The authors are grateful for the support provided by Dry Land Agricultural Research Institute of Iran. Sincere gratitude goes to other colleagues in the other Agricultural Research Stations (Khorram-Abad, Moghan, Ilam and Gonbad) for their technical assistance.

Published: December 2, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mohammadi, M., Sharifi, P., & Karimizadeh, R. (2014). Stability Analysis of Durum Wheat Genotypes by Regression Parameteres in Dryland Conditions. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62(5), 1049-1056. doi: 10.11118/actaun201462051049
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AFZAL ARAIN, M., SIAL, M. A., ARIF RAJPUT, M., MIRBAHAR, A. A. 2011. Yield stability in bread wheat genotypes. Pakistan J. Botany, 43(4): 2071-2074.
    2. AKURA, M., KAYA, Y., TANER, S. 2005. Genotype-Environment Interaction and Phenotypic Stability Analysis for Grain Yield of Durum Wheat in the Central Anatolian Region. Turkish J. Agric. Fores., 29: 369-375.
    3. AMIN, M., MOHAMMAD. T., KHAN, A. J., IRFAQ, M., ALI, A., TAHIR, G. R. 2005. Yield stability of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the North West Frontier Province. Pakistan Songklanakarin J. Sci. Tech., 27(6): 1147-1150.
    4. BAJPAI, P. K., PRABHAKARAN, V. T. 2000. A new procedure of simultaneous selection for high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Indian J. Gene. Plant Breed, 60(2): 141-146.
    5. BECKER, H. C., LEON, J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding, 101: 1-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x Go to original source...
    6. EBERHART, S. A., RUSSEL, W. A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci., 6: 36-40. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x Go to original source...
    7. FINLAY, K. W, WILKINSON, G. N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian J. Agric. Res., 14: 742-754. DOI: 10.1071/AR9630742 Go to original source...
    8. FRANSIS, T. R., KANNENBERG, L. W. 1978. Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian J. Plant Sci., 58: 1029-1034. DOI: 10.4141/cjps78-157 Go to original source...
    9. HERNANDEZ, C. M., CROSSA, J. CASTILLO, A. 1993. The area under the function: An index for selecting desirable genotypes. Theoretical Appl. Gene, 87: 409-415. DOI: 10.1007/BF00215085 Go to original source...
    10. KANG, M. S. 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agronomy J., 85: 754-757. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030042x Go to original source...
    11. KARIMIZADEH, R., MOHAMMADI, M., SABAGHNIA, N., SHEFAZADEH, M. K., POURALHOSSINI, J. 2012. Univariate stability analysis methods for determining genotype × environment interaction of durum wheat grain yield. African J. Biotech., 11(10): 2563-2573. Go to original source...
    12. LIN, C. S., BINNS, M. R. 1988. A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar x location data. Canadian J. Plant Sci., 68: 193-198. DOI: 10.4141/cjps88-018 Go to original source...
    13. LIN, C. S., BINNS, M. R., LEFKOVITCH, L. P. 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Sci., 26: 894-900. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050012x Go to original source...
    14. MOHAMMADI, M., KARIMIZADEH, R., HOSSINPOUR, T., FALAHI, H. A., KHANZADEH, H., SABAGHNIA, N., MOHAMMADI, P., ARMION, M., HOSNI, M. H. 2012. Genotype × Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis of Seed Yield of Durum Wheat Genotypes in Dryland Conditions. Notulae Sci. Bio., 2012, 4(3): 57-64. Go to original source...
    15. MOHAMMADI, M., KARIMIZADEH, R., HOSSEINPOUR, T. 2013. Parameters of AMMI model for yield stability analysis in durum wheat. Agric. Cons. Sci., 78(2): 119-124.
    16. PERKINS, J. M., JINKS, J. L. 1968. Environmental and genotype environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity, 23: 339-356. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1968.48 Go to original source...
    17. SISSONS, M. 2008. Role of durum wheat composition on the quality of pasta and bread. Food 2: 75-90.
    18. POMPILIU, M., SAULESCU, N. N., ITTU, G., PAUNESCU, G., VOINEA, L., STERE, I., MIRLOGEANU, S., CONSTANTINESCU, E. NASTASE, D. 2009. Grain yield and yield stability of winter wheat cultivars in contrasting weather conditions. Romanian Agric. Res., 26: 1-8.
    19. RASUL, I., ZULKIFFAL, M., ANWAR, J., KHAN, S. B., HUSSAIN RIAZUDIN, M. 2006. Grain Yield Stability of Wheat Genotypes under Different Environment in Punjab. J. Agric. Soc. Sci., 2(4): 222-224.
    20. SISSONS, M. J. 2008. Role of durum wheat composition on the quality of pasta and bread. Global Science Books, 75-90.
    21. SHUKLA, G. K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29: 237-245. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1972.87 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content