Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2014, 62(5), 875-881 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462050875

Evaluation of Grape Pomace Composting Process

Patrik Burg1, Tomáš Vítěz2, Jan Turan3, Jana Burgová4
1 Department of Horticultural Machinery, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Engineering, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
3 Department of Agricultural Engeneering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
4 Department of Breeding and Propagation of Horticultural Plants, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The paper deals with the problems of composting of grape pomace in strip compost piles. The three variants of compost piles formed from grape pomace and vegetables waste, wood chips and mature in varying proportions were tested. Turning of piles was performed using windrow turner PKS 2.8, in which the achieved performance was monitored. On the performance of windrow turner has a significant influence also cross section or width and height of turning piles and the bulk density of ingredients including their moisture. In evaluating, attention has been paid to assessment of selected parameters (temperature, moisture content) of the composting process. From the viewpoint of temperature course, the highest temperature reached at the piles in Var. I (64.1 °C) and Var. II (55.3 °C). Moisture of compost piles in the individual variants did not differ significantly and ranged between 25-35%.

Keywords: compost, composting, grape pomace, compost piles, windrow turner
Grants and funding:

Results presented in this paper were obtained within work on the NAAR Project (The National Agency for Agriculture Research Project) No. QH81200 called "Optimization of water regime in landscape and increase of its retention capacity through the application of composts from biologically degradable waste to arable land and permanent grassland", under guidance of the Ministry of Agriculture.

Published: December 2, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Burg, P., Vítěz, T., Turan, J., & Burgová, J. (2014). Evaluation of Grape Pomace Composting Process. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis62(5), 875-881. doi: 10.11118/actaun201462050875
Download citation

References

  1. BERTRAN, E., X. SORT, M. SOLIVA, I. 2004. Trillas Composting winery waste: sludges and grape stalks. Bioresource Technology, 95: 203-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.07.012 Go to original source...
  2. BREITENBECK, G. A., SCHELLINGER, D. 2004. Calculating the reduction in material mass and volume during composting. Compost Science and Utilization, 12(4): 365-371. DOI: 10.1080/1065657X.2004.10702206 Go to original source...
  3. DIAZ, M. J., MADEJO, E., LOPEZ, F., LOPEZ, R. 2002. Cabrera Optimization of the rate vinasse/grape pomace for co-composting process. Process Biochemistry, 37: 1143-1150. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-9592(01)00327-2 Go to original source...
  4. DIAZ, L. F., BERTOLDI, M., BIDLINGMAIER, W. 2007. Compost Science and Technology Hardbound.
  5. FERRER, J. R., MUJICA, D., PÁEZ, G. 1993. Composting from grape pomace. Revista Tecnica Ing. Univ. Zulia, 16: 191-198.
  6. FERRER, J. R., PAEZ, G., MARMOL, Z. et al. 2001. Agronomic use of biotechnologically processed grape wastes. Bioresource Technology, 76: 39-44. DOI: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00076-6 Go to original source...
  7. HANSEN, T. L., LA COUR JANSEN, J., SPLIID, H., DAVIDSSON, Ĺ. and CHRISTENSEN, T. H. 2007. Composition of source-sorted municipal organic waste collected in Danish cities. Waste Management, 27, 510-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.008 Go to original source...
  8. INBAR, Y., CHEN, Y., HADAR, Y. 1986. The use of composted separated cattle manure and grape marc as a peat substitute in horticulture. Acta Horticultura, 178: 147-154. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1986.178.19 Go to original source...
  9. KOKKORA, M. I., HANN, M. J., GODWIN, R. J. 2006. Biowaste and vegetable compost utilization in agriculture: An agronomic and environmental assessment. In: HORN, R., FLEIGE, H., PETH, S., PENG, X. H. (Eds.), 17th Conference of the International-Soil-Tillage-Research-Organisation. Kiel: Catena Verlag, Kiel, 388-394.
  10. KOMILIS, D., HAM, R. 2004. Life-cycle inventory of municipal solid waste and yard waste windrow composting in the United States. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 130(11): 1390-1400. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:11(1390) Go to original source...
  11. MICHEL JR, F. C. 2002. Effects of Turning and Feedstocks on Yard Trimmings Composting. BioCycle, 43(9):46.
  12. NERANTZIS, E. T., TATARIDIS, P. 2006. Integrated Enology- Utilization of winery by-products into high added value products. e-Journal of Science & Technology, 1-12. 1. Available online: http://e-jst.teiath.gr/issue_3_2006/Nerantzis_3.pdf.
  13. PAREDES, C., ROIG, A., BERNAL, M. P., SÁNCHEZ- MONEDERO, M. A., CEGARRA, J. 2000. Evolution of organic matter and nitrogen during co-composting of olive mill wastewater with solid organic wastes. Biol. Fert. Soils, 32: 222-227. DOI: 10.1007/s003740000239 Go to original source...
  14. RIBERERAU-GAYON, J., PEYBAUD, E. 1982. Ciencias y tecnicas de la vina: Trabados de ampeologia. In: TOMO, I.: Biologia de la vina. Suelos de Vinedo, 671. Ed. Hemisferio Sud SA, Argentina.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.