Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2014, 62(3), 565-570 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462030565

The Effect of Temperature and Time of Day on Welfare Indices in Loose-housed Holstein Cows

Milena Velecká, Jana Javorová, Daniel Falta, Milan Večeřa, Jiří Andrýsek, Gustav Chládek
Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Breeding, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

This study was carried out with the aim to assess the effect of temperature and time of day on the values of welfare indices in Holstein dairy cows. The observation continued for one year and included 77 Holstein cows. The cows were loose-housed in one of the four sections of the barn with straw-bedded stalls. The cows were milked three times a day (at 4.00, 8.00 and 17.00). The barn is situated on Mendel University farm in Žabčice (the Czech Republic: GPS 49°0'51.786"N, 16°36'14.809"E). The air temperature was monitored with three sensors fitted at the level of the animals' whithers in 15-minute intervals. The following welfare indices were evaluated: CCI (the Cow Comfort Index), CCI* (the modified Cow Comfort Index which reflects the motivation to lie down), SSI (the Stall Standing Index) and PEL (the Proportion Eligible Lying). The maximal CCI values (above 90%) and the minimal SSI values (below 10%) were found (in the barn in Zabcice) at temperatures up to 30 °C. The maximal CCI* values (above 70%) only occurred at temperatures up to 20 °C. The maximal PEL values (above 80%) were detected at temperatures up to 25 °C. The maximal CCI values (above 90%) as well as the minimal SSI values (below 10%) were found in the period between 9.00 and 12.00 (+1 to +3 hours after milking). The maximal PEL values (above 80%) occurred in the period between 9.00 and 16.00 (+1 to +8 hours after milking). The maximal CCI* values (above 70%) were detected between 14.00 and 15.00 (+6 to +7 hours after milking). CCI* index appears to be more eligible for welfare assessment compared to CCI index. This study could have a practical impact on cattle husbandry because it may help the farmers secure adequate husbandry conditions for the animals and thus positively affect milk production.

Keywords: Cow Comfort Index, Stall Standing Index, Proportion Eligible Lying, temperature, Holstein cows
Grants and funding:

This study was supported by Interní Grantová Agentura FA (Internal Grant Agency FA), MENDELU TP 5/2014.

Published: August 6, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Velecká, M., Javorová, J., Falta, D., Večeřa, M., Andrýsek, J., & Chládek, G. (2014). The Effect of Temperature and Time of Day on Welfare Indices in Loose-housed Holstein Cows. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis62(3), 565-570. doi: 10.11118/actaun201462030565
Download citation

References

  1. BRESTENSKÝ, V. a MIHINA, Š. 2006. Organizácia a technológia chovu mlékového hovädzieho dobytka. 1. vyd. Nitra: Slovenské centrum poľnohospodárskeho výskumu.
  2. COOK, N. B., BENNET, T. B., NORDLUND, K. V. 2004. Using indices of cow comfort to predict stall use and lameness. In: Proceedings of 13th International Ruminant Lameness Symposium. Maribor, 162-163. Go to original source...
  3. COOK, N. B., BENNETT, T. B., NORDLUND, K. V. 2005. Monitoring indices of cow comfort in free-stall-housed dairy herds. Journal of dairy science, 88(11): 3876-3885. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73073-3 Go to original source...
  4. DOLEŽAL, O., BEČKOVÁ, I. 2008. Správná chovatelská praxe v chovu skotu. 1. vyd. Praha: Ústav zemědělských a potravinářských a informací.
  5. DOLEŽAL, O. 2009. Vliv prostředí a managementu na kvalitu mléka a výskyt mastitid. Náš chov, 69 (4): 61-65.
  6. DOLEŽAL, O. et al. 2010. Metody eliminace tepelného stresu - významná chovatelská rezerva. 1. vyd. Praha.
  7. DOLEŽAL, O. 2013. Zásady při výstavbě moderních stájí. Zemědělec, 21 (45): 11-13.
  8. GRANT, R. 2009. A quick check for cow comfort. Dairy basics. In: Excerpts from William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Farm Report, September 2009.
  9. HULSEN, J. 2005. Cow signals: a practical guide for dairy farm management. 1st ed. Zutphen: Roodbont.
  10. IGONO, M. O., JOHNSON, H. D., STEEVENS, B. J., KRAUSE, G. F., SHANKLIN, M. D. 1987. Physiological, productive, and economic benefits of shade, spray, and fan system versus shade for Holstein cos during summer heat. Journal Dairy Science, 70(5): 1069-1079. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80113-3 Go to original source...
  11. ILLEK, J., KUDRNA, V., MATĚJÍČEK, M., NOVÁK, P., SLAVÍK, P. 2007. Tepelný stres dojnic - zdraví, produkce, reprodukce. Náš chov, 67 (6): 63-65.
  12. ITO, K. 2009. Assessing cow comfort using lying behaviour and lameness. PhD Thesis. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
  13. KNÍŽKOVÁ, I., KUNC, P., KOUBKOVÁ, M., FLUSSER, J. 1999. Thermal comfort of dairy cows in barn with open-sided construction. In: TAE '99. Trends in Agricultural Engineering. 1. vyd. Praha: Ústav teorie informace a automatizace AV ČR, 394-395.
  14. KNÍŽKOVÁ, I., KNÍŽEK, J. 1995. Termoregulace a adaptační schopnosti skotu. In: Náš chov, 55(6): 28.
  15. LENDELOVÁ, J., BOTTO, L'., POGRAN, Š., REICHSTÄDTEROVÁ, T. 2012. Evaluation of cow comfort index and stall usage index in different cooling systems for dairy cows. In: Book of Abstracts of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science. Bratislava, 27.-31. 8. 2012. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 304.
  16. NEHASILOVÁ, D. 2006. Komfortní ležení dojnic. In: Neue Landwirtschaft, 17 (9): 56-59.
  17. NELSON, A. J. 1996. On-farm nutrition diagnostics. In: Proc. 29th Annu. Conf. Am. Bovine Pract. San Diego, CA. Rome, GA: Am. Assoc. Bovine Pract., 76-85.
  18. MICHAL, P. 2006. Vliv klimatu stáje na chování dojnic při ležení. In: Land technik, 61 (2): 94.
  19. DE ONDARZA, M. B. 2000. Cow comfort. In: Milkproduction.com [online]. Available at: http://www.milkproduction.com/Library/Articles/Cow_Comfort.htm.[21. 10. 2013].
  20. STONE, B. 2006. Score seven areas of cow comfort on your dairy. In: Northeast DairyBusiness, (2): 15-17.
  21. TOUFAR, O., DOLEJŠ, J. 1996. Odraz vlivu extrémních stájových teplot na užitkovosti dojnic chovaných v uzavřené stáji. In: Aktuální otázky bioklimatologie zvířat. Brno: NOEL 2000, 60-62.
  22. VOIGT, Y., GEORG, H., JAHN-FALK, D. 2007. Evaluation of the preference for different free-stall bedding systems by dairy cows under field conditions. In: Tieraerztliche umschau, 62 (10): 531-536.
  23. ZAHRÁDKOVÁ, R. et al. 2009. Masný skot: od A do Z. 1. vyd. Praha: Český svaz chovatelů masného skotu.
  24. ZEJDOVÁ, P., CHLÁDEK G. 2012. Vliv extrémních hodnot stájového prostředí na chování a mléčnou užitkovost dojnic holštýnského plemene skotu. Doktorská disertační práce. Brno: Mendelova Universita v Brně.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.