Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2014, 62(3), 543-552 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462030543

Spatial Orientation in the Urban Space in Relation to Landscape Architecture

Markéta Krejčí, Iva Hradilová
Department of Garden and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The need of individuals to identify with the environment and the ability to create a schematic isometric image of their surroundings are essential factors affecting participation in social relations. Spatial orientation in itself reflects the ability of people to read complex urban space and identify with the place.
The presented work studies spatial orientation in the urban space in the context of landscape design. It analyses and searches for opportunities to apply instruments of a landscape architect as a means of improving spatial orientation and readability of the city. The study makes a synthesis of all the data obtained from the environment model. The methodology of work includes sections of a professional urban view combined with mental mapping of current users of the urban space.
The total synthesis was preceded by an intermediate stage of classification which was a comparison of the mental map with the reality in order to obtain "memorable" elements in the urban space, in which it was fundamental to see which entity the communication partner drew first and what entity it is in terms of spatial urban structure. Another parameter was the frequency of occurrence method.
The presented study responds to this strong spatial anchoring of the memorable orientation entity by defining the landscape element and this is supplemented by the aspect of spatial orientation. The landscape element is defined on the basis of the evolution parkway-greenway → greenfindingway. Its substantiation is multiplied not only from the aspect of spatial economy but also in correlation to the dynamic recreational pattern, psychological well-being or the preference of sustainable mobility. The final document of the study in the form of the so-called wayfinding map has the potential of a foundation material which can be applied to strategic and urban designing as a sum of unbiased data in correlation to involvement of the public into the process of creating the urban space.

Keywords: mental maps, wayfinding, urban space, landscape architecture, spatial orientation
Grants and funding:

The work originated with the support of the Internal Grant Agency ZF MENDELU for the year 2013.

Published: August 6, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krejčí, M., & Hradilová, I. (2014). Spatial Orientation in the Urban Space in Relation to Landscape Architecture. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis62(3), 543-552. doi: 10.11118/actaun201462030543
Download citation

References

  1. AHERN, J. 1995. Greenways as a planning strategy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 33(1-3): 131-155. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(95)02039-V Go to original source...
  2. ARTHUR, P., PASSINI, R. 2002. Wayfinding: People, Signs and Architecture. Limited commemorative ed. Ontario: Focus Strategic Communications.
  3. BLÁHA, J. D., HUDEČEK, T. 2010. Hodnocení kartografických děl mentálními mapami. Kartografické listy, 18: 21-28.
  4. DAY, C. 2004. Duch a místo. Brno: ERA.
  5. DE CERTEAU, M. 1984. Walking in the City. In: The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  6. DRBOHLAV, D. 1991. Mentální mapa ČSFR: definice, aplikace, podmíněnost. In: Sborník České Goegrafické Společnosti, 96(3): 163-176. Go to original source...
  7. GIDDENS, A. 1998. Důsledky modernity. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství.
  8. GOLLEDGE, R., STIMSON, R. 1997. Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective. New York: Gildford Press.
  9. GOULD, P., WHITE, R. 1974. Mental Maps. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  10. JACOBSOVÁ, J. 1975. Smrt a život amerických velkoměst. 1. vyd. Praha: Odeon.
  11. KYNČLOVÁ, M., HUDEČEK, T. and BLÁHA, J. D. 2009. Hodnocení kartografických děl: analýza mentálních map orientačních běžců. Geografie. 114(2): 105-116. Go to original source...
  12. LYNCH, K. 1960. The Image of the City. Cambridge: M. I. T. Press.
  13. MULÍČEK, O., OSMAN, R. and SEIDENGLANZ, D. 2013. Imaginace a reprezentace prostoru v každodenní zkušenosti. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 49(5): 781-809. Go to original source...
  14. NORBERG-SCHULZ, N. 2010. Genius loci: Krajina, místo, architektura. Praha: Dokořán.
  15. O'KEEFE, J., NADEL, L. 1978. The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  16. STUCHLÍK, A. 2003. Prostor a prostorová navigace. Československá fyziologie, 52(1): 22-33.
  17. TOLMAN, E. C. 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men. The Psychological Review, 55(4): 189-208. DOI: 10.1037/h0061626 Go to original source...
  18. TRIEB, M. 1974. Stadtgestaltung: Theorie und Praxi. 1st Edition. Düsseldorf: Bertelsmann GmbH. Go to original source...
  19. VÁGNER, S. 1982. Sídelní struktury. 1st Edition. Praha: SNTL.
  20. ZELENKA, J. 2008. Výzkum kognitivních a mentálních map. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus.
  21. ZIBRIN, P. 1988. Vnímanie urbanistického priestoru. Bratislava: Alfa.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.