Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2013, 61(7), 2555-2560 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361072555

Corporate social responsibility of the 100 largest Indian companies - an analysis of website communication

Avinash Mulky
Marketing Area, Indian Institute of Management Bangalore, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore 560076, India

Corporate social responsibility has become an important concept in the business world in recent decades. CSR is important in all countries but is particularly relevant in emerging markets where the levels of human development are not high. The United Nations Development Programme has created the Human Development Index (HDI) to measure the human development in countries. The present study analyzes the CSR communication on the websites of the 100 largest Indian companies. The objective was to examine the reported CSR activities and determine whether the activities address the dimensions and indicators of the HDI. The study uses content analysis to classify the CSR activities into categories corresponding to HDI parameters. The findings indicate that about two thirds of the companies are using their websites to communicate CSR. Of the companies which reported CSR, about eighty percent report support for primary education and about seventy percent undertake livelihood support activities. The level of corporate involvement in the health dimension of human development is quite low. Reduction of infant and maternal mortality does not get much corporate attention. This study will add to the literature on CSR in emerging markets and will be useful for firms in India and other emerging markets that are planning CSR activities aimed at human development parameters.

Keywords: corporate social responsibility, human development index, India

Received: April 11, 2013; Published: December 24, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mulky, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility of the 100 largest Indian companies - an analysis of website communication. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(7), 2555-2560. doi: 10.11118/actaun201361072555
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BERELSON, B., 1952: Content analysis in communication research. Free Press, 220 p.
    2. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, 2001: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibilities. COM(2001) 366 final [online]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0366:FIN:EN:PDF.
    3. DAHLSRUD, A., 2008: How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1: 1-13. ISSN 1535-3966. DOI: 10.1002/csr.132 Go to original source...
    4. DU, S. B., BHATTACHARYA, C. B., SEN, S., 2007: Reaping Relational Rewards from Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Competitive Positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 3: 224-241. ISSN 0167-8116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.01.001 Go to original source...
    5. ESROCK, S.L., LEICHTY, G.B., 1998: Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Self-Presentation or Agenda-Setting? Public Relations Review, 24, 3: 305-319. ISSN 0363-8111. DOI: 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80142-8 Go to original source...
    6. FOX, T., 2004: Corporate social responsibility and development: In search of an agenda. Development, 47, 3: 32-46. ISSN 1011-6370. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.development.1100064 Go to original source...
    7. HANSA RESEARCH: Indian Readership Survey: IRS 2010 Q2 AIR Numbers-Toplines [online]. Available from: http://www.hansaresearch.com/dload/Output.pdf.
    8. JOYNER, B. E., PAYNE, D., 2002: Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 4: 297-311. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021237420663 Go to original source...
    9. KIM, H. R., LEE, M., LEE, H. T., KIM, N. M., 2010: Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee-Company Identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 4: 557-569. ISSN 0167-4544. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0440-2 Go to original source...
    10. MAIGNAN, I., RALSTON, D. A., 2002: Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and Us: Insights from Businesses' Self-Presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 3: 497-514. ISSN 0047-2506. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491028 Go to original source...
    11. MAIGNAN, I., 2001: Consumers' Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Cross Cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 1: 57-72. ISSN 0167-4554. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006433928640 Go to original source...
    12. MCWILLIAMS, A., SIEGEL, D. S., WRIGHT, P. M., 2006: Corporate Social Responsibility: International Perspectives. Journal of Business Strategies, 23, 1: 1-12. ISSN 0887-2058. Go to original source...
    13. SECCHI, D., 2007: Utilitarian, Managerial and Relational Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 3: 347-373. ISSN 1468-2370. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00215.x Go to original source...
    14. SMITH, M., 2003: Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether and How. California Management Review, 45, 4: 52-76. ISSN 0008-1256. DOI: 10.2307/41166188 Go to original source...
    15. SWEENEY, L., COUGHLAN, J., 2008: Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14, 2: 113-124. ISSN 1352-7266. DOI: 10.1080/13527260701856657 Go to original source...
    16. TANG, L., LI, H., 2009: Corporate social responsibility communication of Chinese and global corporations in China. Public Relations Review, 35, 3: 199-212. ISSN 0363-8111. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.016 Go to original source...
    17. UNDP, 1990: Human Development Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 189 p. ISBN 0-19-506481.
    18. VITALIANO, D. F., 2010: Corporate Social Responsibility and Labor Turnover. Corporate Governance, 10, 5: 563-573. ISSN 1476-8683. DOI: 10.1108/14720701011085544 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content