Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2013, 61(6), 1613-1619 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361061613

The effect of urea with urease inhibitors and urea on yield and nitrate content in potato tubers

Karel Drápal, Miroslav Jůzl, Petr Elzner, Vít Mareček
Department of Crop Science, Breeding and Plant Medicine, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The three-year field trial was established on two localities - Žabčice and Valečov in 2010-2012. Seven variants of nitrogen fertilization in four replications have been involved in this experiment - 100% of urea (U), 80% of urea, 60% of urea, 100% of UreaStabil (US), 80% of UreaStabil and 60% of UreaStabil, whilst 100% corresponded to 90 kg N.ha-1 after subtracting the content of Nmin in the soil, and the control variant without fertilization by mineral nitrogen. The two varieties with different lengths of vegetation periods have been chosen for the experiment - the early variety Karin and the mid-early variety Red Anna. In all cases, samples for the yield and qualitative analyses have been taken according to the phenological phase - the beginning of physiological maturity. The obtained results show that the highest average yield has been achieved in the variant of 100% of urea - 40.95 t.ha-1, the yield of this variant was statistically significantly higher than the yield of the other variants of fertilization (P < 0.05). Variants treated by urea without the urease inhibitor reached an average yield of 37.62 t.ha-1. However, this yield was not statistically significantly higher when comparing to the urea with the urease inhibitor (P > 0.05). In regard to localities, a relatively high average yield (44.58 t.ha-1) has been achieved on a characteristically potato-growing locality Valečov. This yield was statistically significantly higher than the one attained on the Žabčice locality (P < 0.05). In respect to varieties, the mid-early variety Red Anna attained a higher average yield (39.65 t. ha-1). Likewise, this yield was statistically significantly higher than the one of the early variety Karin (P < 0.05). The best year was 2012, in which the average yield of 38.73 t.ha-1 was achieved. This yield was statistically significantly higher than the yield of the year 2010 (P < 0.05). As far as nitrates are concerned, the lowest average nitrate content has been found in the control variant - 184.1 mg.kg-1 of moisture content. Nevertheless, the differences of the nitrate content among all the varieties were statistically inconclusive (P > 0.05). When using the fertilizer consisting of urea without the urease inhibitor, a lower average content of nitrates was found - 207.8 mg.kg-1 of moisture content, but there was no statistically significant difference in comparison to the urea with the urease inhibitor variants (P > 0.05). In respect to localities, lower average nitrate content was established on the Žabčice locality - 177 mg.kg-1 of moisture content. A statistical significance in comparison to the Valečov locality was found (P < 0.05). The mid-early variety Red Anna had a lower average nitrate content - 167.7 mg.kg-1 of moisture content. When compared to the early variety Karin, a statistical significance was found P 0.05) was found between 2010 and 2011, but in contrast to the year 2012, a statistical significance in regard to the nitrate content was established (P < 0.05).

Keywords: potatoes, urea, UreaStabil, yield, nitrate content
Grants and funding:

This study was supported by THE Research project NAZV No. QI101A184: THE NAME OF THE PROJECT: Potato Growing Technology - New Friendly Approaches to the Environment.

Received: August 5, 2013; Published: November 24, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Drápal, K., Jůzl, M., Elzner, P., & Mareček, V. (2013). The effect of urea with urease inhibitors and urea on yield and nitrate content in potato tubers. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis61(6), 1613-1619. doi: 10.11118/actaun201361061613
Download citation

References

  1. BERÁNEK, K., KLEMENT, V., 2001: Dusičnany v bramborách v období 1991-2000. Agro (ochrana, výživa, odrůdy), 6, 6: 28-29. ISSN 1211-362X.
  2. DIVIŠ, J., ŠVAJNER, J., BÁRTA, J., 2005: Vliv dusíku na výnos průmyslových brambor v roce 2004. Sborník vědeckých a odborných prací z konference "Hospodaření v méně příznivých oblastech", Lukavec u Pacova: VURV Praha., s. 40. ISBN 80-86555-83-6.
  3. DIVIŠ, J., 1993: Změny obsahu dusičnanů v hlízách brambor v průběhu skladování. Sborník Zemědělské fakulty JU, Fyto, 17, 2: 71-79. ISSN 1212-5598.
  4. GISLASON, J., DAHLE, H. K., BAERUG, R., ROER, L., RONSEN, K., 1984: Nitrate in potatoes. 1. The effect of fertilization and storage on the nitrate content in 5 genotypes grown in widely separated localities. Potato Research, 27, 3: 331-337. ISSN 0014-3065. DOI: 10.1007/BF02357645 Go to original source...
  5. HAMOUZ, K., VOKÁL, B., ČEPL, J., 2000: Výnos a kvalita brambor vypěstovaných v bramborářské a řepařské výrobní oblasti. Bramborářství, 8, 5: 5-6. ISSN 1211-2429.
  6. HOFFERBERT, U., GROCHOLL, J., 2000: Speisekartoffeln - muss die N-Düngung sortenspezifisch erfolgen? Kartoffelbau, 51, 1-2: 43-49. ISSN 0022-9156.
  7. KALAČ, P., MÍKA, V., 1997: Přirozené škodlivé látky v rostlinných krmivech. Praha: ÚZPI, s. 318. ISBN 80-85120-96-8.
  8. MARTIN, R. J., WEERDEN, T. J. VAN DER, RIDDLE, M. U., BUTLER, R. C., 2008: Comparison of Agrotain-treated and standard urea on an irrigated dairy pasture, Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 70, 1: 91-94. ISSN 0369-3902. Go to original source...
  9. MÍČA, B., 1990: Dusičnany, dusitany a nitrosaminy u brambor. Výživa lidu, 45, 6: 83-84. ISSN 0042-9414.
  10. MRÁZ, J., 2007: Urea Stabil - Efektivní zdroj dusíku pro polní plodiny. Sborník z konference "Prosperující olejniny", 12.- 14. 12. 2007. Praha: ČZU v Praze, s. 121-122. ISBN 978-80-213-2128-1.
  11. PRUGAR, J., 1992: Agroekologické faktory ve vztahu k hromadění dusičnanů v zelenině a bramborách. Rostlinná výroba, 38, 9-10: 875-882. ISSN 1214-1178.
  12. PUTZ, B., BERGTHALLER, W., 1989: Nitrat in Kartoffeln, Der Kartoffelbau, 40, 8: 287-293. ISSN 0022-9156.
  13. ROINILA, P., VAISANEN, J., GRANSTEDT, A., KUNTTU, S., 2003: Effect of different organic fertilization practises and mineral fertilization on otato quality. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture, 21, 2: 165-194. ISSN 0144-8765. DOI: 10.1080/01448765.2003.9755260 Go to original source...
  14. RŮŽEK, P., PIŠANOVÁ, J., KUSÁ, H., 2006: Nové dusíkaté hnojivo Urea stabil a jeho uplatnění ve výživě rostlin. Sborník příspěvků z konference "Nové trendy v používání dusíkatých hnojiv", 25.-26. 10. Brno: MZLU Brno, VÚRV Praha-Ruzyně, s. 40-42. ISBN 80-86555-96-8.
  15. ŠENKÝŘ, J., PETR, J., 1979: Dusičnanová iontově selektivní elektroda. Chemické listy, 73, 12: 1097. ISSN 1213-7103.
  16. SHAHBAZI, K., TOBEH, A., EBADI, A., DEHDAR, B., MAHROOZ, A., JAMAATI-E-SOMARIN, S., SHIRI-E-JANAGRAD, M., 2009: Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Nitrate Accumulation in Tubers as Affected by Four Fertilization Levels in Three Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivars. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences, 2, 4: 95-104. ISSN 1996-3351. Go to original source...
  17. VANĚK, V. et al., 2002: Výživa a hnojení polních a zahradních plodin, 3. vyd., Praha: Ing. Martin Sedláček, s. 91-93. ISBN 80-902413-7-9.
  18. VELÍŠEK, J., 1999: Chemie potravin III, 1. vyd., Tábor: OSSIS, s. 328. ISBN 80-902391-5-3.
  19. VELÍŠEK, J., HAJŠLOVÁ, J., 2009: Chemie potravin II, 3. vyd., Tábor: OSSIS, s. 623. ISBN 978-80-86659-16-9.
  20. WESTERMANN, D. T., JAMES, D. W., TINDALL, T. A., HURST, R. L., 1994: Nitrogen and potassium fertilization on potatoes - sugars and starch. American Potato Journal, 71, 7: 433-453. ISSN 1874-9380. DOI: 10.1007/BF02849098 Go to original source...
  21. ZAMAN, M., NGUYEN, M. L., BLENNERHASSETT, J. D., 2010: The effect of different rates of urea with or without urease inhibitor (NBPT) on wheat yield and quality, Agricultural Journal, 5, 5: 309-312. ISSN 1816-9155. Go to original source...
  22. ŽIŽKA, J., 2011: Brambory, Situační a výhledová zpráva. Praha: MZe, s. 9. ISBN 978-80-7084-981-1.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.