Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2013, 61(1), 147-155 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361010147

Impact of pre-sowing treatment and sowing season on Douglas fir emergence rate in a specific seed lot

Antonín Martiník, Eva Palátová, Kateřina Houšková
Department of Silviculture, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Not only in the Czech Republic there is a problem with low yield of Douglas fir seedlings in forest tree nurseries. It can be caused mainly by two factors: the type of pre-sowing treatment and the temperature at the time of sowing. The aim of this study is to find out their influence on the emergence rate of Douglas fir. We have tested one specific seed lot originated from the Czech Republic subject to the following variants of pre-sowing treatment: soaking for 48 hours, stratification without a medium for 21 days and for 30 days after 48 hours of soaking and stratification for 30 days with a medium. The treated seeds were sown in a phytotron at temperatures of 13/8 °C - 10/14 hours (day/night) (simulation of early sowing season in February or March) and at temperatures of 17/13 °C - 14/10 hours (simulation of late sowing season in May). In case of the early sowing season, approximately half of the germinable seeds emerged in all treatment variants including the control variant (seeds without stratification). The late sowing season resulted in different emergence rate of the seeds that were subject to different variants of pre-sowing treatment (24-51 %). Then, 21day and 30day stratification were not sufficient for the tested conditions of the early and late sowing season. None of the combinations of pre-sowing treatment and sowing time resulted in full use of the seed potential of the tested seed lot.

Keywords: Douglas fir, germination capacity, yield of seedlings
Grants and funding:

This work was funded from the NAZV Grant No. QI112A172 - financial support by the Czech Republic Ministry of Agriculture.

Received: October 22, 2012; Published: April 8, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Martiník, A., Palátová, E., & Houšková, K. (2013). Impact of pre-sowing treatment and sowing season on Douglas fir emergence rate in a specific seed lot. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(1), 147-155. doi: 10.11118/actaun201361010147
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ANONYMOUS, 2000: Differences in Seed and Seedling Attributes Between Select (orchard produced) and Standard (wild stand) Seedlots. Proceedings for the 2000 Forest Nursery Association of BC Meeting. Prince George: Cone and Seed Improvement Program BCMoF Tree Seed Centre, 13.
    2. BUŠINA, F., 2006: Natural regeneration of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) in forest stands of Hůrky training Forest District, Higher Forestry School and Secondary Forestry School in Písek. Journal of Forest Science, 53, 1: 20-34. Go to original source...
    3. CARMICHAEL, R. L., 1957: Relation of seeding date to germination of Douglas-fir seed. Northwest Science, 31, 4: 177-182.
    4. COLOTEO, D., STEENIS, E. V., PETERSON, M., BENNETT, R., TROTTER, D., DENNIS, J., 2001: Seed handling guidebook. Ministry of Forests, British Columbia, 106.
    5. Czech National Standard (ČSN 48 1211), 2006: Forest seed management - Collection, quality and test of seed stock quality of forest trees. ČNI, 60.
    6. EDWARDS, D. G. W., EL-KASSABY, Y. A., 1995: Douglas-fir genotypic response to seed stratification. Seed Science & Technologies, 23, 771-778.
    7. FERGUSON SPEARS, J., 1995: An introduction to seed vigour testing. In: VENTER, A. A. V. (ed.) Seed vigour testing seminar. ISTA, Zürich: 1-9.
    8. GOSLING, P. G., 1988: The effect of moist chilling on the subsequent germination of some conifer trees over a range of temperatures. Journal of Seed technology, 12, 90-98.
    9. GOSLING, P. G., ALDHOUS, J. R., 1994: Seed. Chapter 5. In: ALDHOUS, J. R., MASON, W. L. (eds.) Forest nursery practice. Forestry commission bulletin 111, London HMSO: 66-83.
    10. GOSLING, P. G., PEACE, A. J., 1990: The analysis and interpretation of ISTA "double" germination tests. Seed Science & Technologies, 18, 791-803.
    11. GOSLING, P., SAMUEL, Y., PEACE, A., 2003: The effect of moisture content and prechill duration on dormancy breakage of Douglas fir seeds (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii [Mirb.] Franco). Seed Science Research, 13, 239-246. DOI: 10.1079/SSR2003141 Go to original source...
    12. HEIT, C. E., 1968: Propagation from seed. Part 17: Testing and growing Douglas fir seeds from different sources. America Nurseryman, 10, 12-60.
    13. HOFMAN, J., 1964: Silviculture of Douglas fir. Státní zemědělské nakladatelství Praha, 253. ISBN 07-002-64.
    14. HOFMAN, J., HEGER, B., 1959: Results of sowing operation of Pseudotsuga menziesii in 1956. Work of VÚLHM, 16, 85-100.
    15. International Rules for Seed Testing (ISTA), 1993: International Seed Testing Association, Zürich: 288.
    16. JONES, S. K., GOSLING, P., 1994: Target moisture content prechill overcomes the dormancy of temperate conifer seeds. New Forests, 8: 309-321. Go to original source...
    17. KANTOR, P., BUŠINA, F., KNOTT, R., 2010: The position of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) and its natural regeneration at training forest district Hůrky of the secondary forestry schools Písek. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 55, 4: 251-262. Go to original source...
    18. KINSKÝ, V., ŠIKA, A., 1987: Possibilities of natural regeneration of Douglas fir. Lesnická práce, 66, 9: 393-399.
    19. MÜLLER, C., FALLERI, E., LAROPPE, E., BONNET-MASIMBERT, M., 1999: Drying and storage of prechilled Douglas fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii, seeds. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 2: 172-177. DOI: 10.1139/x98-193 Go to original source...
    20. OWSTEN, P. W., STEIN, W. I., 1974: Pseudotsuga Carr. Douglas-fir. In: SCHOPMEYER, C.S. (ed.) Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.: 374-683.
    21. SEIFERT, S., 2005: Treatment of seeds of conifer tree species. Thesis. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück, 154.
    22. SORENSEN, F. C., 1978: Date of sowing and nursery growth of provenance of Pseudotsuga menziesii given two fertilizer regimes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 15, 1: 273-279. DOI: 10.2307/2402936 Go to original source...
    23. SORENSEN, F. C., 1991: Stratification period and germination of Douglas-Fir seed from Oregon seed orchard: Two case studies. Research Note. Pacific Northwest Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, PNW-RN-499, 23. Go to original source...
    24. SULLIVAN, T. O., SULLIVAN, D. S., 1984: Operational direct seeding of Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine with alternative foods in British Columbia. Research note, Province of British Columbia, Ministry of Forest, 97, 16. ISSN 0226-9368.
    25. ŠIKA, A., 1985: Reproduction possibilities of Douglas fir in ČSR from indigenous stands. Work of VÚLHM, 67, 41-62.
    26. ŠINDELÁŘ, J., BERAN, F., 2004: To some current problems of Douglas fir cultivation (benchmarking study). Lesnický průvodce, VÚLHM Jíloviště-Strnady, 3, 34. ISBN 80-86461-38-6.
    27. The Climate Atlas of the Czech Republic, 2007: Palacký University Olomouc, 255.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content