Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2012, 60(6), 343-350 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260060343

The effect of low and high barn temperatures on behaviour and performance of Holstein dairy cows

Milan Večeřa1, D. Falta, G. Chládek, L. Máchal
1 Ústav chovu a šlechtění zvířat, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika

The experiment was carried out at the University Training Farm in Žabčice (the Czech Republic; location 49°0'51.081"N, 16°36'14.848"E, 179 m.a.s.l) over the period of one year (1st July to 30th June). The assessment of temperature impact was based on data from 16 hottest days (H) and 16 coldest days (L). The experimental group consisted of 70 cows in various stage of lactation (30d-210d) and parity (1-8). The cows were housed in a section (one quarter) of a free-stall barn with 77 stalls in three rows. Row A was located peripherally, close to the side wall, row B was in the middle and row C was situated centrally, close to the feed table. The cows were observed weekly on the same day at 9.00 a.m. The microclimate characteristics were recorded daily: temperature in hot (H) resp. cold (L) period was in average 27.1°C resp. - 1.47 °C, and relative humidity 54.4 % resp. 77.3 %, and THI 75 resp. 33.
Behaviour was described by a number of cows standing or lying down, number of cows lying down on their left or right side and row preference (A, B, C) in the resting area. Cow Comfort Index (CCI - a number of cows lying down at given time) was calculated. A total of 1587 observations were analysed. A number of cows lying down (922) was significantly higher than that of standing cows (665). Milk production was significantly higher in hot (H) period (by 1.0-1.7 kg). There was an interaction in milk production between period and standing. In H period the standing cows produced more milk, in L period vice versa. The cows with non-significant tendency towards left-side laterality produced more milk (by 1.2 kg). No interaction was found between period and laterality for milk production. All the observed parameters significantly differed between rows A, B and C. Row A was the most preferred, the cows preferring it were young (low number of lactation) with greatest milk production. The cows in row C had the lowest milk production and were in late lactation. The interaction was found between period and row affected number of lactation (P < 0.01) and number of cows (P < 0.05). In H period the row A was preferred by older cows (high number of lactation), while in L period it was preferred by younger cows. The cows in H period used row C less while in L period they preferred it.

Keywords: temperature, behaviour, Holstein, cows
Grants and funding:

This study was supported by the Research plan No. MSM6215648905 "Biological and technological aspects of sustainability of controlled ecosystems and their adaptability to climate change", which was financed by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic and by Internal Grant Agency of FA, MENDELU TP 1/2012.

Received: June 25, 2012; Prepublished online: July 19, 2013; Published: July 20, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Večeřa, M., Falta, D., Chládek, G., & Máchal, L. (2012). The effect of low and high barn temperatures on behaviour and performance of Holstein dairy cows. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 60(6), 343-350. doi: 10.11118/actaun201260060343
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BÍLEK, M., 2002: Welfare ve stájích pro skot, (Welfare in barns for cattle, in Czech), Praha: Ústav zemědělských a potravinářských informací, 32 s. ISBN 80-7271-112-1.
    2. CHLÁDEK, G., 2004: Složení mléka jako levný a účinný prostředek pro hodnocení chovného prostředí dojnic. (Milk composition as a cheap and efficient tool for evaluation of housing facilities for dairy cows, in Czech). In: HANUŠ, O. a kol. Aktuální problémy řízení v chovu skotu. (Ccurrent problems of cattle farming, in Czech). Rapotín. Agrární komora Olomouckého kraje, Okresní agrární komora Šumperk, s. 56-60.
    3. COLAM-AINSWORTH, P., LUNN, G. A., THOMAS, R. C., EDDY, R. G., 1989: Behaviour of cows in cubicles and its possible relationship with laminitis in replacement dairy heifers. The Veterinary Record, Vol. 125, Issue 23, s. 573-575. ISSN 0042-4900.
    4. DOLEŽAL, O., 2003: Vyhodnocení čtyřřadové dispozice boxových loží metodou preferenční testace. (Evaluation of a four-row disposition of lying boxes using the method of preference tests, in Czech). [on-line], Dostupné z: www.mze-vyzkum-infobanka.cz/DownloadFile/41757.aspx. (cit. 1. 3. 2012).
    5. DOLEŽAL, O., DOLEJŠ, J., KNÍŽKOVÁ, I., KUNC, P., BÍLEK, M., ČERNÁ, D., 2003: Komfortní ustájení vysokoprodukčních dojnic. (Comfort housing for high performance dairy cows, in Czech). Výzkumný ústav živočišné výroby, Uhřiněves. ISBN 80-86454-28-2.
    6. DRISSLER, M., GAWORSKI, M., TUCKER, C. B., WEARY, D. M., 2005: Freestall maintenance: Effects on lying behavior of dairy cattle. Journal of dairy science, 88 (7): 2381-2387, JUL 2005. ISSN 0022-0302. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72916-7 Go to original source...
    7. FREGONESI, J. A., TUCKER, C. B., WEARY, D. M., 2007: Overstocking reduces lying time in dairy cows. Journal of dairy science, 90 (7): s. 3349-3354. ISSN 0022-0302. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2006-794 Go to original source...
    8. GAWORSKI, M. A., TUCKER, C. B. and WEARY, D. M., 2003: Effects of two free-stall designs on dairy cattle behavior. Proceedings of the Fifth International Dairy Housing Conference, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, pp. 139-146.
    9. GIBBONS, J., MEDRANO-GALARZA, C., PASSILLE, A. M., RUSHEN, J., 2012: Lying laterality and the effect of IceTag data loggers on lying behaviour of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 136 (2): s. 104-107. ISSN 0168-1591. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.12.005 Go to original source...
    10. GRANT, R., 2009: A quick check for cow comfort. Dairy basics. Excerpts from William H. Miner Agricultural Research Institute Farm Report, September 2009.
    11. HAHN, G. L., 1999: Dynamic response sof cattle to thermal heat loads. Journal of Animal Science. ISSN 0021-8812.
    12. HOUPT, K. A., 1998: Domestic behaviour for veterinarians and animal scientists, 3rd ed. Iowa state University Press, s. 98-103. ISBN 0-8138-1061-2.
    13. HROUZ, J., MÁCHA, J., KLECKER, D., VESELÝ, P., 2007: Etologie hospodářských zvířat. (Ethology of farm animals, in Czech). Mendelova zemědělská a lesnická univerzita v Brně, 185 s. ISBN 978-80-7157-463-7.
    14. IGONO, M. O., BJOTVEDT, G., SANFORD-CRANE, H. T., 1992: Environmental profile and critical temperature effects on milk production of Holstein cows in desert climate. International journal of biometeorology, 36 (2): s. 77-87, DOI: 10.1007/BF01208917. DOI: 10.1007/BF01208917 Go to original source...
    15. ITO, K. et. al., 2009: Lying behaviour: Assessing within - and between - herd variation in free-stall-housed dairy cows. Journal of dairy science, 92 (9): s. 4412-4420, ISSN 0022-0302. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2009-2235 Go to original source...
    16. KOUKAL, P., 2001: Výživa dojnic v teplém počasí podle zkušenosti z léta 2000, (Nutrition of dairy cows during periods of hot weather, experiences from the summer of 2000, in Czech). Farmář, 9: 75-76. ISSN 1210-9789.
    17. NATZKE, R. P., BRAY, D. R. and EVERETT, R. W., 1982: Cow Preference for Free Stall Surface Material. Journal of Dairy Science 65, 146-153. ISSN 0022-0302. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82163-2 Go to original source...
    18. MATĚJKA, J., 1995: Teplotní a vlhkostní poměry stájí pro skot v zimě, (Ethology of farm animals, in Czech). Náš chov, 12, s. 22-23. ISSN 0027-8068.
    19. RAE, B., 2012: Dairy Diagnostic Tool Box. Worksheet 9: Calculating Cud Chewing Index & Cow Comfort Quotient. University of Minnesota [on line]. Dostupné z: http://www.ansci.umn.edu/dairy/toolbox/toolbox.htm.
    20. THORNE, M., 2008: Busy cows need comfort when they take a rest. Farmes weekly (10/2008). ISSN 0014-8474.
    21. TUCKER, C. B., WEARY, D. M., RUSHEN, J., PASSILLÉ, A. M., 2004: Designing Better Environments for Dairy Cattle to Rest. Advances in Dairy Technology (2004) Volume 16, p. 39.
    22. TUCKER, C. B., COX, N. R., WEARY, D. M., SPINKA, M., 2009: Laterality of lying behaviour in dairy cattle. Applied animal behaviour science, 120 (3-4): p. 125-131, SEP 2009. ISSN 0164-1591. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.05.010 Go to original source...
    23. VEČEŘA, M., STUDENÝ, S., POLÁK, O., ZEJDOVÁ, P., FALTA, D., CHLÁDEK, G., 2012: Vliv pořadí laktace na celodenní preferenci boxové řady dojnic českého strakatého plemene. (Effect of rank of lactation on the all-day preference of box row in dairy cows of the Czech Red Pied breed, in Czech). [CD-ROM]. In: Animal Breeding. s. 62-66. ISBN 978-80-7157-224-4.
    24. VEČEŘA, M., FALTA, D., ZEJDOVÁ, P., POLÁK, O., STUDENÝ, S., CHLÁDEK, G., 2011: Výběr řady boxů dojnicemi po návratu z ranního dojení. (Selection of box row by dairy cows after the return from the morning milking, in Czech). [CD-ROM]. In: MendelNet 2011 - Proceedings of International Ph.D. Students Conference. s. 56. ISBN 978-80-7375-563-8.
    25. WAGNER-STORCH, A. M., PALMER, R. W. and KAMMEL, D. W., 2003: Factors Affecting Stall Use for Different Freestall Bases. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2253-2266. ISSN 0022-0302. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73816-8 Go to original source...
    26. WALTEROVÁ, L., ŠAROVSKÁ, L., FALTA, D., CHLÁDEK, G., 2009: Vztah mezi vybranými klimatickými prvky uvnitř a vně stáje dojnic v průběhu roku. (Relationship between some selected climatic parameters measured inside and outside barns for dairy cows during the year, in Czech). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis (4) 2009, s. 125-132. ISSN 1211-8516. Go to original source...
    27. WEST, J., W., 2003: Effects of Heat-Stress on Production in Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2131-2144. ISSN 0022-0302. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73803-X Go to original source...
    28. ZEJDOVÁ, P., WALTEROVÁ, L., FALTA, D., CHLÁDEK, G., 2010: Letní teploty stájového ovzduší a jejich vliv na mléčnou užitkovost dojnic. (Summer temperatures of barn air and their effect on milk performance of dairy cows, in Czech). [CD-ROM]. In: MendelNet 2010 Proceedings of International Ph.D. Students Conference. s. 68. ISBN 978-80-7375-453-2.
    29. ZEJDOVÁ, P., FALTA, D., CHLÁDEK, G., MÁCHAL, L., 2011: Effect of lactation stage, its number, current milk performance and barn air temperature on laterality of Holstein dairy cows laying behaviour. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis (5) 2011, s. 315-321. ISSN 1211-8516. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content