Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2012, 60(4), 363-378 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260040363

Comparative advantages of the Czech agrarian foreign trade in relation to the EU and third countries

Miroslav Svatoš, Luboš Smutka
Katedra ekonomiky, Provozně ekonomická fakulta, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Kamýcká 129, Praha 6-Suchdol, 165 21, Česká republika

The Czech agrarian trade represents a variable which has been developing in a very dynamic manner over time. In the time period of 2000-2010 alone, the value of its turnover grew up from about USD 2.7 billion to about USD 11.4 billion. In the course of time, the Czech agrarian foreign trade has gradually adjusted its territorial as well as commodity structure. As regards the importance of trading partners, Member States of the European Union have unequivocally come to the fore. Accession of CR to the EU has also left its marks on the existing form of the commodity structure of realized exports and imports alike, while especially the export structure has still been shaping in a significant manner. The paper deals with issues related to development of the Czech agrarian foreign trade with the aim to identify its comparative advantages in the area of the commodity and territorial structure both in relation to the global market (the market of third countries outside the EU) and in relation to the EU27 countries. Following are the outcomes of the paper conclusions. Although the Czech agrarian trade as the whole does not have any comparative advantages both with respect to the market of the EU27 countries and with respect to third countries (the global market), its individual aggregations are able to win through and gain comparative advantages, especially with respect to individual Member States of the EU. In this respect, it is worth mentioning that in 2010, 190 (i.e. nearly one half) out of 390 studied export flows realized to 26 Member States of the EU were competitive. The comparative advantages are more or less evenly distributed among the new and old Member States of the EU. As regards third countries, it may be stated that the Czech agrarian export has comparative advantages only to a significantly limited scope.

Keywords: agrarian trade, export, import, Czech Republic, EU, third countries, comparative advantages, LFI, RCA, index, territorial and commodity structure
Grants and funding:

This paper is part of a research project carried out within the framework of the grant No. 6046070906, funded by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.

Received: May 22, 2012; Published: August 7, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Svatoš, M., & Smutka, L. (2012). Comparative advantages of the Czech agrarian foreign trade in relation to the EU and third countries. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis60(4), 363-378. doi: 10.11118/actaun201260040363
Download citation

References

  1. BALASSA, B., 1965: Trade liberalization and 'revealed' comparative advantages. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies. Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 99/123. ISSN 10490078. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x Go to original source...
  2. BAŠEK, V., KRAUS, J., 2009: Czech foreign agricultural trade after joining the European Union. Agric. Econ. - Czech. Vol. 55, No. 3. pp. 583-595. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  3. BOJNEC, Š., FERTO, I. 2009: Agro-food trade competitiveness of Central European and Balkan countries. Food Policy. Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 417-425. ISSN 0306-9192. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.01.003 Go to original source...
  4. BURIANOVÁ, J., 2011: Effect of the 2008-2009 economic crisis on the results of agricultural foreign trade of the Czech Republic. Agric. Econ. - Czech. Vol. 57, No. 5, pp. 226-231. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  5. CAETANO, J., GALEGO, A., 2000: Trade flows among CEEC and UE countries: what are the future perspectives? Revista de Economía Mundial. Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 65-87. ISSN 1576-0162.
  6. DRABÍK, D., BÁRTOVÁ, L., 2008: An Assessment of the Impact of the EU Enlargement on Agri-food Trade of New EU Member States. SPU, Nitra. ISBN 978-80-552-0139-9.
  7. FIDRMUC, J, GROZEA-HELMENSTEIN, D., WÖRGÖTTER, A., 1999: East-West Intra Industry Trade Dynamics. Weltwirtschaftliches Archive. Vol. 135, No. 2, pp. 332-346. DOI: 10.1007/BF02707259 Go to original source...
  8. HINLOOPEN, J., and MARREWIJK, C., 2001: On the empirical distribution of the Balassa index. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv / Review of World Economics. Vol. 137, No. 1, pp. 1-35. ISSN 1610-2886. DOI: 10.1007/BF02707598 Go to original source...
  9. HORSKÁ, E., 2010: European studies on intercultural dimension of international business: marketing and managerial consequences. SPU Nitra. ISBN 978-80-5520530-4.
  10. LAFAY, G., 1992: The Measurement of Revealed Comparative Advantages in M.G. Dagenais and P.A. Muet eds., International Trade Modeling, Chapman & Hill, London. ISBN 10: 0412450003 / 0-412-45000-3.
  11. POHLOVÁ, K., 2010: Ročenka agrárního zahraničního obchodu ČR za rok 2008. Praha: ÚZEI. ISBN 978-80-86671-73-4.
  12. POKRIVČÁK, J., DRABÍK, D. et al., 2008: Agricultural Trade in Central and Eastern Europe. SPU Nitra. ISBN 978-80-552-0139-9.
  13. PROUDMAN, J., REDDING, S. 2000: Evolving Patterns of International Trade. Review of International Economics. Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 373-396. ISSN 1467-9396. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9396.00229 Go to original source...
  14. QINETI A., RAJCANIOVA M., MATEJKOVA E., 2009: The competitiveness and comparative advantage of the Slovak and the EU agri-food trade with Russia and Ukraine. Agric. Econ. - Czech. Vol. 55, No. 8, pp. 375-383. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  15. TVRDOŇ, J., 2000: Ekonometrics (in Czech). CZU, Prague. ISBN80-213-04282-0.
  16. UN COMTRADE, 2012: Trade database, [on-line]. cit. 03/05/2012. Available: http://comtrade.un.org/db/default.aspx.
  17. UTKULU, U., SEYMEN, D., 2004: Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: Evidence for Turkey vis-ą-vis the EU/15. Paper was presented at the European Study Group 6th Conference, ETSG 2004.
  18. VOLOŠIN, J. et. al., 2011: Analysis of external and internal influences on CR agrarian foreign trade. Agric. Econ. - Czech. Vol. 57, No. 9, pp. 422-435. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  19. ZAGHINI, A., 2005: Evolution of trade patterns in the new EU member states. Economics of Transition. Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 629-658. ISSN 1468-0351. DOI: 10.1111/j.0967-0750.2005.00235.x Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.