Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2012, 60(3), 93-100 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260030093

Yield and quality of head lettuce after 24-epibrassinolide application under optimal and reduced irrigation

Martin Koudela, František Hnilička, Jaroslava Martinková, Lenka Svozilová, Jitka Doležalová
Katedra zahradnictví, Katedra botaniky a fyziologie rostlin, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Praha 6 - Suchdol, Česká republika

The aim of this work was evaluation of 24-epibrassinolide influence on yield and quality of head lettuce in optimal and reduced moisture conditions and work out recommendation of 24-brassinosteroids use for lettuce in growers praxis. Field trials were carried out on land belonging to the Demonstration and Research Station of CULS in Prague - Troja in 2009 and 2011. Planting on 27. 8. 2009 and 20. 8. 2011 was done at planting space 0.25 × 0.30 m, each variant in four repetition (single plot 4,5 m2). Seedlings of head lettuce (cultivar Santoro - Rijk Zwaan) were used. Irrigation was carried out by microspraying, and was based on current values of efficient water capacity (EWC); the critical value of the EWC was 80% for optimally irrigated fields (irrigation O), and 50% for variants with reduced levels of irrigation (irrigation S). The total amount of irrigation water during vegetation were as follows: the variant with optimal levels of irrigation (O) had 131 mm in 2009 and 123 mm in 2011; the variant with reduced levels of irrigation (S): 58 mm in 2009 and 63 mm in 2011 Three variants were in both (O and S) conditions: A - no application of 24-epibrassinolide, B - 1 × 24-epibrassinolide application immediately after planting, and C - application of 24-epibrassinolide 2 x (immediately after planting and then after 14 days after 1st application). Concentration of 24-epibrassinolide was 10-6. Following parameters of head lettuce were set after harvesting (10.-12. 10. 2009 and 14.-15. 10. 2011): weight of single heads, marketable heads, marketable yield (in pcs/ha and t/ha) and ascorbic acid and nitrate contents. Influence of 24-epibrassinolide on single lettuce head weight was not significant, decrease of head weight was evident after 24-epibrassinolide application in some variants. Significant increase of marketable heads number and their percentages were noted after 24-epibrassinolide application in optimal moisture conditions - in variant B of 12 261 heads/ha (11.1 %) and in variant C of 16 279 heads/ha (14.7 %) compared with non treated variant A. This trend was not visible in reduced moisture conditions. Increase (nonsignificant) of total marketable yield (in t/ha) was noted after 24-epibrassinolide application. No significant differences were founded among the ascorbic acid contents in each irrigation variant. A higher ascorbic acid content (by approximately 11.9 % in variant C compared with control A) is evident after application of 24-epibrassinolide in the variant with lower levels of irrigation - S. Contrarily, decrease ascorbic acid content is indicated in the optimal levels of irrigation - O (by approximately 16.8 % in variant C compared with control A). The influence of 24-epibrassinolide application on the nitrate content was not significant, but the trend of nitrates decrease in optimal irrigation conditions is evident.

Keywords: 24-epibrassinolide, lettuce, yield, quality, ascorbic acid, nitrates
Grants and funding:

This work was supported by project NAZV QH 81110 and the project MSM 604607901.

Received: January 10, 2012; Published: August 28, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Koudela, M., Hnilička, F., Martinková, J., Svozilová, L., & Doležalová, J. (2012). Yield and quality of head lettuce after 24-epibrassinolide application under optimal and reduced irrigation. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis60(3), 93-100. doi: 10.11118/actaun201260030093
Download citation

References

  1. BABU, R. N., DEVARAJ, V. R., 2008: High temperature and salt stress response in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2: 40-48.
  2. EL-FATTAH, R. I. A., 2007: Osmolytes-antioxidant behaviour in Phaseolus vulgaris and Hordeum vulgare with brassinosteroid under salt stress. American Eurasian J. Agric. Environm. Sci., 2: 639-647.
  3. HERNANDEZ, I., ALEGRE, L., VAN BREUSEGEM, F., MUNNE-BOSCH, S., 2009: How relevant are flavonoids as antioxidants in plants? Trends in Plant Sciences, 14: 125-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.12.003 Go to original source...
  4. JAGER, C. E., SYMONS, G. M., ROSS, J. J., REID, J. B., 2008: Do brassinosteroids mediate the water stress response? Physiol. Plantarum, 133, 2008: 417-425. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01057.x Go to original source...
  5. KOUDELA, M., HNILIČKA, F., SVOZILOVÁ, L., MARTINKOVÁ, J., 2011: Cauliflower qualities in two irrigation levels with the using of hydrophilic agen. Horticultural Science 38 (2): 81-85. Go to original source...
  6. MALÝ, I., BARTOŠ, J., HLUŠEK, J., KOPEC, K., PETŘÍKOVÁ, K., 1998: Polní zelinářství. Agrospoj, Praha.
  7. MASUDA, D., ISHIDA, M., YAMAGUCHI, K., YAMAGUCHI, I., KIMURA, M., NISHIUCHI, T., 2007: Phytotoxic effects of trichothecenes on the growth and morphology of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot., 58, 2007: 1617-1626. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl298 Go to original source...
  8. MÜSSIG, C., 2005: Brassinosteroid promoted growth. Plant Biol., 7: 110-117. DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-837493 Go to original source...
  9. NAKASHITA, H., YASUDA, M., NITTA, T., ASAMI, T., FUJIOKA, S., ARAI, Y., SEKIMATA, K., TAKATSUTO, S., YAMAGUCHI, I., YOSHUDA, S., 2003: Brassinosteroid functions in a broad range of dinase resistence in Tobago and rice. Plant Journal, 33 (5): 887-898. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01675.x Go to original source...
  10. NOGUES, S., 2008: Brassinosteroids alleviate heat-induced inhibition of photosynthesis by increasing carboxylation efficiency and enhancing antioxidant systems in Lycopersicon esculentum. J. Plant Growth Regul., 27, 2008: 49-57. Go to original source...
  11. OGWENO, J. O., SONG, X. S., SHI, K., HU, W. H., MAO, W. H., ZHOU, Y. H., Yu, J. Q., NAIR, A. S., ABRAHAM, T. K., JAYA, D. S., 2008: Studies on the changes in lipid peroxidationn and antioxidant in drought stress induced cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. varieties) Journal of Environmental Biology, 29: 689-691.
  12. PETŘÍKOVÁ, K., JÁNSKÝ, J., MALÝ, I., PEZA, Z., POLÁČKOVÁ, J., ROD, J., 2006: Zelenina: pěstování, ekonomika, prodej (Vegetable: Growing, Economy, Sale). Prague, Profi Press: 237.
  13. ŠEBÁNEK, J., GRÉC, L., JAVOR, A., ŠVIHRA, J., KUPKA, J., PROCHÁZKA, S., 1983: Fyziologie rostlin. SZN, Praha.
  14. TAKEMATSU, T., TAKEUCHI, Y., 1999: Effects of brassinosteroids on growth and yields of crops. In: SAKURAI, A., YOKOTA, T., CLOUSE, S. D. (eds.): Brassinosteroids, pp. 1-253. Tokyo, Springer - Verlag.
  15. VOGEL, G., 1996: Handbuch des speziellen Gemüsebaues. Ulmer, Stuttgart, 1127 p.
  16. XIA, X. H., HUANG, Y. Y., WANG, L., HUANG, L. F., YU, Y. L., ZHOU, Y. H., YU, J. Q., 2006: Pesticides-induced depression of photosynthesis was alleviated by 24-epibrassinolide pretreatment in Cucumis sativus L. Pest. Biochem. Physiol., 86, 2006: 42-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2006.01.005 Go to original source...
  17. YADAV, R. S. and PANDEY, A. K., 1997: Effect of antitranspirants on wheat genotypes under moisture stress. Indian J. Plant Physiol., 2: 229-231.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.