Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2012, 60(2), 383-390 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260020383

Public spending and Wagner's law in Central and Eastern European countries

Irena Szarowská
Katedra financí, Obchodnì podnikatelská fakulta, Slezská univerzita Opava, Univerzitní nám. 1934/3, 733 40 Karviná, Èeská republika

This paper provides direct empirical evidence on cyclicality and the long-term and short-term relationship between government spending and output in eight Central and Eastern European countries in a period 1995-2009. We analyzed annual data on government spending in compliance with the COFOG international standard. Although the theory implies that government spending is countercyclical, our research does not prove that. The results confirm cyclical development of government spending on GDP, Wagner's law and voracity effect in the CEE countries during 1995-2009.
We used Johansen cointegration test and the error correction model. Output and government spending are cointegrated for at least 4 from 10 spending functions in every country and it implies a long-term relationship between government spending and output. The government spending functions are procyclical in most CEE countries (93% cases in the sample). Average value of long-run elasticity coefficient is 1.74 for all spending functions, 1.02 for total government spending. We also analyzed the short-run relationship between spending and output. The coefficient values (average is 2.89) confirm the voracity hypothesis, as they suggest that in response to a given shock to real GDP, government spending rises by even more in percentage points.

Keywords: government spending, cyclicality, voracity effect, long-run elasticity, short-run elasticity, cointegration, error correction term
Grants and funding:

This article ensued thanks to the support of the grant GA ÈR 403/11/2073 Procyclicality of financial markets, asset price bubbles and macroprudential regulation.

Received: November 30, 2011; Published: October 3, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Szarowská, I. (2012). Public spending and Wagner's law in Central and Eastern European countries. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis60(2), 383-390. doi: 10.11118/actaun201260020383
Download citation

References

  1. ABBOTT, A. and JONES, P., 2011: Procyclical government spending: Patterns of pressure and prudence in the OECD. Economics Letters, 111: 230-232. ISSN 0165-1765. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.02.009 Go to original source...
  2. AKITOBY, B. et al., 2008: Public spending, voracity, and Wagner's law in developing countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 4: 908-924. ISSN 0176-2680. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.12.001 Go to original source...
  3. ALESINA, A. et al., 2008: Why is ĝscal policy often procyclical? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6, 5: 1006-1030. ISSN 1542-4774. DOI: 10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.5.1006 Go to original source...
  4. ERICSSON, N. and McKINNON, J., 2002: Finite sample properties of error correction tests for cointegration. Econometrics Journal, 5: 285-318. ISSN 1368-4221. DOI: 10.1111/1368-423X.00085 Go to original source...
  5. FIORITO, R. and KOLLINTZAS, T., 1994: Stylized facts of business cycles in the G7 from a real business cycles perspective. European Economic Review, 38: 235-269. ISSN 0014-2921. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2921(94)90057-4 Go to original source...
  6. GALÍ, J., 1994: Government size and macroeconomic stability. European Economic Review, 38: 17-132. ISSN 0014-2921. Go to original source...
  7. GANELLI, G., 2010: The International Effects of Government Spending Composition. Economic Modelling, 27, 3: 631-640. ISSN 0264-9993. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2010.01.002 Go to original source...
  8. GAVIN, M. et al., 1996: Managing Fiscal Policy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Volatility, Procyclicality, and Limited Creditworthiness. IADB Office of the Chief Economist, Working Paper No. 326. Inter-American Development Bank, March 1996. Go to original source...
  9. GAVIN, M. and PEROTTI, R., 1997: Fiscal policy in Latin America. Macroeconomics Annual, 12: 11-70. ISSN 1537-2642. DOI: 10.2307/3585216 Go to original source...
  10. HAMERNÍKOVÁ, B. et al., 2009: Komparace vŭvoje veĝejnŭch vŭdajù ve vybranŭch zemích EU [online]. [cit 2010-11-10] Url: http://kvf.vse.cz/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/1239726368_sb_hamernikovamaaytovaullikova.pdf.
  11. HERCOWITZ, Z. and STRAWCZYNSKI, M., 2004: Cyclical Ratcheting in Government Spending: Evidence from the OECD. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 1: 353-361. ISSN 1530-9142. DOI: 10.1162/003465304323023868 Go to original source...
  12. JOHANSEN, S., 1991: Cointegration and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models. Econometrica, 59, 6: 1551-1580. ISSN 1468-0262. DOI: 10.2307/2938278 Go to original source...
  13. KAMINSKY et al., 2004: When it Rains, it Pours: Procyclical Capital Flows and Macroeconomic Policies. In: Nber Macoeconomics Annual, 11-53. Go to original source...
  14. LANE, P. R., 1998: International Perspectives on the Irish Economy. Economic and Social Review, 29, 2: 217-222. ISSN 0012-9984.
  15. LANE, P. R., 2003: The Cyclical Behaviour of Fiscal Policy: Evidence from the OECD. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 12: 2661-2675. ISSN 0047-2727. DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00075-0 Go to original source...
  16. PEACOCK, A. and SCOTT, A., 2000: The curious attraction of Wagner's law. Public Choice, 102: 1-17. ISSN 0048-5829. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005032817804 Go to original source...
  17. RAJKUMAR, A. S. and SWAROOP, V., 2008: Public Spending and Outcomes: Does Governance Matter? Journal of Development Economics, 86, 1: 96-111. ISSN 0304-3878. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.08.003 Go to original source...
  18. SZAROWSKÁ, I., 2011: Relationship between government spending and economic growth in the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendeleianae Brunensis, 59, 7: 415-421. ISSN 1211-8516. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070415 Go to original source...
  19. TALVI, E. and VEGH, C. A., 2005: Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78: 156-190. ISSN 0304-3878. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.07.002 Go to original source...
  20. WAGNER, A., 1911: Staat in nationalökonomischer Hinsicht. Handwörterbuch der Staatswissenschaften. 3rd ed. Jena: Fischer. 743-745.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.