Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2011, 59(7), 403-414 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070403

Lease revenue reporting on the side of lessor in connection with transfer of right to use assets (RTU) to lessee

Patrik Svoboda
Ústav účetnictví a daní, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika

The paper analyzed some of the approaches whose application is eligible for the recording of lease contracts on the side of lessor so that this recording display as closely as possible the essence of the lease relationship and at the same time it would be symmetrical to the way of recording on the side of lessee resulting not from value of transferred physical assets but from the evaluated right to use this asset. Impacts of individual variants of approaches into the income statement and statement of financial position are analyzed. It turns out that apparently it is not possible to apply only one approach (as it is in the case of lessee), without gross distortion of the financial position of the lessor. Some of the options of derecognition approach truly shows the situation, especially in long-term leases and leases where the risks and rewards associated with the lease are transferred to the lessee, for the other leases it is recommended sometimes to use underecognition property from the assets of the lessor during the lease period, but rather report a liability to leave to lessee to use (performance obligations approach). Compared with the current method of recording an operating lease, this approach without taking into account the cost of maintenance leads to another course of reporting profits (rise in the early stages against the growth in the final stages), but also brings a more fundamental problem, and it is overvaluation of lessor's assets. In addition, it is possible to doubt about the correctness to report such liability as an unconditional liability. The approach is also not consistent with the IASB and the FASB project that is devoted to the recognition of revenues. The possible way, according to author's opinion, might be regulation of existing model of reporting operating lease or derecognition approach.

Keywords: right to use, lessor, derecognition, performance obligation, revenue

Received: August 30, 2011; Published: January 26, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Svoboda, P. (2011). Lease revenue reporting on the side of lessor in connection with transfer of right to use assets (RTU) to lessee. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis59(7), 403-414. doi: 10.11118/actaun201159070403
Download citation

References

  1. IFRS, 2008: A guide through International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) 2008: including the full text of the Standards and Interpretations and accompanying documents issued by the International Accounting Standards Board as approved at 1 July 2008: with extensive cross-references and other annotations. London: International Accounting Standards Committee Foundation, 2008. 2827 s. ISBN 978-1-905590-68-1.
  2. Lease - Preliminary view, 2010:[online] Available on http://www.iasb.org/NR/rdonlyres/FF3A33DB-E40D-4125-9ABD-9AF51EB92627/0/DPLeasesPreliminaryViews.pdf. Cit. 20110810.
  3. ED - Leases, 2010: Available on http://www.ifrs.org/NR/rdonlyres/C03C9E95-822E-4716-81ED-04B9CC4943BE/0/EDLeasesStandard0810.pdf Cit. 20110807.
  4. ALTMAN, E. I., HALDEMAN, R. G., NARAYANAN, P., 1977: ZetaTM analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance 1. p. 29-54. ISSN 0378-4266. DOI: 10.1016/0378-4266(77)90017-6 Go to original source...
  5. BOSCO, B., 2011: IASB/FASB Lease Accounting project Exposure draft: Issues and implications. [online]. Available on http://www.leasing-101.com/articles/Article%20world%20leasing.pdf. Cit. 20110812.
  6. BRETON, G., TAFFLER, R. J., 1995: Creative accounting and investment analyst response. Accounting and Business Research 25. P. 81-92. ISSN 2159-4260. DOI: 10.1080/00014788.1995.9729931 Go to original source...
  7. ELAM, R., 1975: The effect of lease data on the predictive ability of financial ratios. Accounting Review 50. p. 25-42. ISSN 1558-7967.
  8. ELY, K. M., 1995: Operating lease accounting and the market's assessment of equity risk. Journal of Accounting Research 33, p. 397-415. ISSN 0021-8456. DOI: 10.2307/2491495 Go to original source...
  9. FINNERTY, J. E., FITZSIMMONS, R. N., OLIVER, T. W., 1980: Lease capitalization and systematic risk. Accounting Review 55 p. 631-639. ISSN 1558-7967.
  10. GOODACRE, A., 2003: Operating lease finance in the UK retail sector. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 13. p. 99-125. ISSN 1466-4402. DOI: 10.1080/0959396032000065373 Go to original source...
  11. IMHOFF, E. A., LIPE, R. C., WRIGHT, D. W., 1993: The effects of recognition versus disclosure on shareholder risk and executive compensation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 8. p. 51-63. ISSN 0148-558X. DOI: 10.1177/0148558X9300800402 Go to original source...
  12. MUNTER, P., RATCLIFFE, T. A., 1983: An assessment of user reactions to lease accounting disclosure. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 6, p. 108-114. ISSN 0148-558X.
  13. WILKINS, T. A., ZIMMER, I., 1983: The effect of leasing and different methods of accounting for leases on credit evaluations. Accounting Review 58, p. 749-764. ISSN 1558-7967.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.