Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2011, 59(7), 379-386 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070379

Efficiency of the current municipal waste expenditure - methodology approach and its application

Michal Struk, Jana Soukopová
Katedra veřejné ekonomie, Ekonomicko-správní fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Lipová 41a, 602 00 Brno, Česká republika

The paper introduces methodology designed in order to evaluate and compare efficiency of chosen municipal waste expenditure via calculating efficiency ratings. First part of the paper briefly describes current situation around environmental protection expenditure in Czech Republic and explains reason why the area of current municipal waste expenditure has been chosen for the efficiency evaluation. Second part is dedicated to the idea of the efficiency evaluation methodology which is based on Cost-effectiveness Analysis (CEA). CEA is working with two aspects of efficiency. First aspect is efficiency of expenditure per capita and second is efficiency of expenditure per municipal waste ton. Data necessary for the analysis together with the sources where these data can be acquired are also introduced. The description of exact process of calculating efficiency ratings for each municipality then follows. Whole methodology is demonstrated on selected sample of municipalities together with the results of efficiency evaluation and their graphical depiction. Last part of the paper discusses problems that might arise while performing this efficiency evaluation together with possible expansions of the evaluation.

Keywords: efficiency, current municipal waste expenditure, Cost-effectiveness analysis

Received: August 31, 2011; Published: January 26, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Struk, M., & Soukopová, J. (2011). Efficiency of the current municipal waste expenditure - methodology approach and its application. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis59(7), 379-386. doi: 10.11118/actaun201159070379
Download citation

References

  1. ARIS, 2011: ARISweb [online], quoted 22.8.2011.
  2. BOARDMAN, A. E., 2006: Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall. 560 p. ISBN 0-13-143583-3.
  3. EUROSTAT, 2007: Environmental expenditure statistics, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. 212 p. ISBN 978-92-79-04732-9, available at.
  4. ISOH [online], quoted 22.8.2011.
  5. ISPOP [online], quoted 22.8.2011.
  6. LEVIN, H. M, McEWAN, P. J., 2000: Cost-effectiveness analysis: methods and applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. 308 p. ISBN 0761919341.
  7. MF ČR, 2002: Attachment to Ordinance No. 323/2002 Coll. (Budget Structure) [online], quoted 22.8.2011.
  8. OCHRANA, F., 2006: Programové financování a hodnocení veřejných výdajů: teorie a metodika hodnocení veřejných výdajů a veřejných služeb v systému programové alokace zdrojů. Vyd. 1. Praha: Ekopress. 189 p. ISBN 8086929132.
  9. RIS - Regional Information Service [online], quoted 22.8.2011.
  10. SOUKOPOVÁ, J., BAKOŠ, E., 2010: Asessing the Efficiency of Municipal Expenditures Regarding Environmental Protection. In: Environmental Economics and Investment Assessment III. Cyprus: WIT Press. pp. 107-111, ISBN 9781845644369. Go to original source...
  11. SOUKOPOVÁ, J., STRUK, M., 2011: Methodology for the Efficiency Evaluation of the Municipal Environmental Protection Expenditure. In: Hřebíček, J., Schimak, G., Denzer, R: Environmental Software Systems - Frameworks of eEnvironment. Chennai, India: Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York, pp. 327-340, ISBN 978-3-642-22284-9. Go to original source...
  12. ÚFIS [online], quoted 22.8.2011.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.