Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2011, 59(7), 167-176 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070167

Framework of performance measurement system for Czech small breweries

Gabriela Chmelíková
Ústav regionální a podnikové ekonomiky, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Česká republika

In spite of increasing interest on performance measurement systems during last 30 years, there is not visible any significant deviation from widely used financial measures in Czech business environment. These are generally criticized on account of several reasons: lag information content, bad fitting with information age competition and difficult communication to employees. Shift from the financial perspective to the non-financial one within the performance management invoked genesis of different performance measurement systems. The aim of this paper was therefore to establish the status of current knowledge in the area of performance measurement systems for small and medium enterprise. This theoretical phase of the research was based on the study of up-to-date reviews and it focused on the description of the most recent performance measurement systems. Further after considering Czech business specifics suitable base for performance measurement system was chosen and the framework of whole performance measurement system not dissimilar to Balanced Scorecard was designed. After considering the circumstances of the micro-brewing segment in the Czech Republic this article resulted in designing an example system suitable for usage among Czech micro-breweries.

Keywords: performance measurement system, financial measures, non-financial measures, performance management
Grants and funding:

This paper has arisen in the framework of the project: GA ČR (Czech Science Foundation) No. 402/09/1365 Methodological approach to the economic analysis of business.

Received: September 2, 2011; Published: January 26, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Chmelíková, G. (2011). Framework of performance measurement system for Czech small breweries. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis59(7), 167-176. doi: 10.11118/actaun201159070167
Download citation

References

  1. BACIDORE, J. M., BOQUIST, J. A., MILBOURN, T. T., THAKOR, A. V., 1997: The search for the best financial performance measure. Financial Analysis Journal 53(3): 11-20. DOI: 10.2469/faj.v53.n3.2081 Go to original source...
  2. BERENSTEIN, R.,1998: An analysis of EVA. Merrill Lynch Quantitative Viewpoint. 3.
  3. BIDDLE, G., BOWEN, R. M., WALLACE, J. W., 1997: Does EVA beat earnings: Evidence on associations with stock returns and firm values. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Vol. 24: 301-336. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00010-X Go to original source...
  4. BITITCI, U. S., CARRIE, A. S. and MCDEVITT, L., 1997: Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. Vol. 17: 522-534. DOI: 10.1108/01443579710167230 Go to original source...
  5. ECCLES, R. G., PYBURN, P. J., 1992: Creating a Comprehensive System to Measure Performance, Management Accounting: 41-44.
  6. FELTHAM, G. D.,ISAAC, G. E., MBAGWU, C. and VAIDYANATHAN, G., 2004: Perhaps EVA Does Beat Earnings - Revisiting Previous Evidence. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 16(1): 83-88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2004.tb00598.x Go to original source...
  7. FITZGERALD, L., JOHNSON, R., BRIGNALL, S., SILVESTRO, R. and VOSS, C., 1991: Performance measurement in Service Business. London: CIMA.
  8. FLAPPER, S., FORTUIN, L. and STOOP, P., 1996: Towards consistent performance management systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. Vol. 16, No. 7: 27-37. DOI: 10.1108/01443579610119144 Go to original source...
  9. GARENGO, P., BIAZZO, S., BITITCI, U. S., 2005: Performance Measurement Systems in SMEs: A Review for a Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. Volume 7, Issue 1: 25-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00105.x Go to original source...
  10. GHALAYINI, A., NOBLE, J. and CROWE, T., 1997: An integrated dynamic performance measurement system for improving manufacturing competitiveness. International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 48: 207-225. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5273(96)00093-X Go to original source...
  11. HUDSON, M., SMART, P. A. and BOURNE, M., 2001: Theory and practice in SME performance systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. Vol. 21: 1096-1116. DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000005587 Go to original source...
  12. CHENNELL, A., DRANSFIELD, S., FIELD, J., FISHER, N., SAUNDERS, I. and SHAW, D., 2000: Operational Performance Management: a system for organisational performance measurement. Proceeding of the Performance Measurement Conference, Cambridge, July 2000.
  13. CHMELÍKOVÁ, G., 2008: Economic Value Added versus traditional performance measures by food-processing firms in the Czech Republic. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. Vol. 11, No. 4.
  14. CHMELÍKOVÁ, G., 2010: Báze ekonomické analýzy českých podniků. Acta Universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2010. sv. LVIII, č. 3, s. 79-84. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201058030079 Go to original source...
  15. KAPLAN, R. S., NORTON, D. P., 1992: The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, January-February: p. 71.
  16. KAPLAN, R. S., NORTON, D. P., 1996: Translating Strategy into Action, HBS Press, USA.
  17. KAPLAN, R. S., NORTON, D. P., 2000: The Strategy Focussed Organisation, HBS Press, USA. Go to original source...
  18. KEEGAN, D. P., EILER, R. G. and JONES, C. R., 1989: Are your performance measure obsolete? Management Accounting. Vol. 70: 45-50.
  19. KRAMER, J. K., PUSHNER, G., 1997: An empirical analysis of economic value added as a proxy for market value added. Financial Practice and Education, Spring/Summer: 41-49.
  20. LAITINEN, E. K., 2002: A dynamic performance measurement system: Evidence from small Finnish technology companies. Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 18: 65-99. DOI: 10.1016/S0956-5221(00)00021-X Go to original source...
  21. LYNCH, R. and CROSS, K., 1991: Measure Up! Yard-sticks for Continuous Improvement. Cambridge: Blackwell.
  22. MAŘÍKOVÁ, P., MAŘÍK, M., 2001: Moderní metody hodnocení výkonnosti a oceňování podniku. Ekopress Praha.
  23. MAIER, T., 2009: Change in brand positioning in the Czech beer market in the period of 1998 - 2007. Conference on the Economics of Beer and Brewing Leuven, May 2009.
  24. MEDORI, D. and STEEPLE, D., 2000: A framework for auditing and enhancing performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. Vol. 15, No. 4: 520-533. DOI: 10.1108/01443570010318896 Go to original source...
  25. NIVEN, P., 2006: Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results. Wiley, USA.
  26. NEELY, A., MILLS, J., RICHARDS, H., GREGORY, M., BOURNE, J. and KENNERLEY, M., 2000: Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. Go to original source...
  27. OLIVER, L. and PALMER, E., 1998: An integrated model for infrastructural implementation of performance measurement. Performance Measurement-Theory and Practice (Conference proceedings) Cambridge University, Vol. 2: 695-702.
  28. STEWART, S., 1994: EVA Roundtabel. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance Vol. 7: 46-70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.1994.tb00406.x Go to original source...
  29. STEWART, S., 1995: Advertisment in Harvard Business Review, November-December: 20.
  30. WALBERT, L., 1994: The Stern Steward performance 1000: Using EVA to build market value. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance. Vol. 6: 109-120. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.1994.tb00256.x Go to original source...
  31. TONCHIA, S., TONI, A., 2001: Performance Measuremnet Systems: Models, Characteristics and Measures. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. Vol. 21, No. 1-2: 1-37. Go to original source...
  32. TURVEY, C. G., LAKE, L., DUREN, E., SPARLING, D., 2000: The Relationship between Economic Value Added and the Stock Market Performance of Agribusiness Firms. Agribusiness, Vol. 16, No. 4: 399-416. DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(200023)16:43.0.CO;2-9 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.