Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2011, 59(5), 65-82 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159050065

Chosen biotic factors influencing raw cow milk freezing point

Oto Hanuš1, Yunhai Zhang2, Marek Bjelka3, Josef Kučera4, Petr Roubal5, Radoslava Jedelská4
1 AgriResearch Rapotín, Výzkumníků 267, 788 13 Vikýřovice, The Czech Republic
2 Anhui Agricultural University, Department of Animal Sciences, College of Animal Science and Technology, Changjiang West Road 130, 230036 Hefei, P. R. China
3 Breeders Cooperative Impuls, Bohdalec 122, 595 22 Bobrová, The Czech Republic
4 Research Institute for Cattle Breeding Rapotín, Výzkumníků 267, 788 13 Vikýřovice, The Czech Republic
5 Dairy Research Institute Ltd., Prague, Ke dvoru 12a, 160 00 Praha 6, The Czech Republic

The milk freezing point depression (FPD) is important physical property. FPD is influenced by milk composition especially by components with osmotic pressure activity and by other physiological factors. There is possible to indicate a foreign (extraneous) water addition into milk by FPD. This is necessary to have a good estimated legislative FPD discrimination limit (FPD-L) for purpose of milk quality control. This paper was aimed at obtaining information to improve such estimation. Impacts factors as season variations, estimated state of dairy cow nutrition and some milk components and properties on milk FPD and their relations to FPD were quantified (n 11 540 - 72 607 bulk raw cow milk samples). The highest FPD was in Spring (-0.52097 ± 0.004877 °C), the lowest in Autumn (-0.52516 ± 0.005725 °C; P < 0.001). Correlation between FPD and lactose was 0.35 (P < 0.001). 12% and 5.4% of FPD variability is explainable by lactose and casein variability. Relationship between FPD and urea (U) was 0.26 (P < 0.001) in March. The worst FPD was in group with presupposed (according to milk urea and protein combination) nitrogen matter (NM) and energy (E) insufficiency (-0.51855 ± 0.007288 °C). The best FPD was in group with presupposed NM and E surplus in feeding ration (-0.52536 ± 0.004785 °C; P < 0.001). The FPD was worse in suspicion on E deficiency (on the basis of fat/crude protein ratio) as compared to presumption for balanced E nourishment of dairy herds (-0.52105 ± 0.006436 °C > -0.52244 ± 0.005367 °C; P < 0.001). Results can improve the estimation of objective FPD-L.

Keywords: dairy cow, bulk milk sample, freezing point depression, fat, protein, casein, energy metabolism estimation, lactose, solids non fat, somatic cell count, urea, free fatty acids
Grants and funding:

This paper was supported by projects KONTAKT ME 09081, MSM 2678846201 and MSM 2672286101 and by NRL-RM activities and education project MSMT-CZ.1.07/2.3.00/09.0081.

Received: March 4, 2011; Published: March 23, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hanuš, O., Zhang, Y., Bjelka, M., Kučera, J., Roubal, P., & Jedelská, R. (2011). Chosen biotic factors influencing raw cow milk freezing point. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis59(5), 65-82. doi: 10.11118/actaun201159050065
Download citation

References

  1. AGABRIEL, C., COULON, J. B., MARTHY, G., 1991: Facteurs de variations du rapport des teneurs en matiéres grasses et protéiques du lait de vache. INRA Product. Anim., 4, 2, 141-149. Go to original source...
  2. BAUCH, W., HUBER, B., BUCHBERGER, J., 1993: Zum Einfluss einiger Parameter auf die Bestimmung des Gefrierpunktes von Milk mit den Cryostar II - LC. DMZ, Lebensmittel und Milchwirtschaft, 114, 5, 112-114.
  3. BÍRO, D., LABUDA, J., CABADAJOVÁ, M., 1992: Factors influencing cow milk production and fat to protein content ratio. (In Slovak) Živoč. Výr., 37, 6-7, 521-528.
  4. BOSSUYT, R., 2003: Milk quality payment in Belgium: why and how. AFEMA Tagung, Mosonmagyaróvár, May.
  5. BROUWER, T., 1981: Calculations concerning the determination of the freezing-point depression of milk. Neth. Milk Dairy J., 35.
  6. BUCHBERGER, J., KLOSTERMEYER, H., 1995: Determination of freezing point in milk with the "System 4000 Milko-Scan" from Foss Electric A/S. DMZ, 23/24, 1-14.
  7. BUCHBERGER, J., 1990a: Einfluss von Rasse, Laktationsstadium und Untersuchungsfehler auf den Gefrierpunkt der Milch. Schule und Beratung, 11/90, IV-9-11.
  8. BUCHBERGER, J., 1997: Erfahrungen mit der Gefrierpunktuntersuchung der Milch. Sborník VÚCHS Rapotín "Management chovu dojnic", duben.
  9. BUCHBERGER, J., 1991: Probleme auch ohne Fremdwasser? Top Agrar, 2, R24-R26.
  10. BUCHBERGER, J., 1990b: Ursachen von Überschreitungen des Grenzwertes von -0,515 °C beim Gefrierpunkt der Milch. Schule und Beratung, 9-10, 1990 b, IV-8-10.
  11. BUCHBERGER, J., 1994: Zum Gefrierpunkt der Milch: Bewertung und Interpretation. DMZ, 115, 8, 376-383.
  12. CROMBRUGGE VAN, J. M., 2003: Freezing Point. Bulletin of IDF, 383, 15-22.
  13. ČSN EN ISO 13366-3, 1998: Milk - Enumeration of somatic cells - Part 3: Fluoro-opto-electronic method. (In Czech) Český normalizační institut, Praha.
  14. ČSN 57 0536, 1999: Determination of milk composition by mid-infrared analyzer. (In Czech) Český normalizační institut, Praha.
  15. ČSN 57 0530, 1973: Methods for testing of milk and milk products. Vydavatelství úřadu pro normalizaci a měření, Praha.
  16. ČSN 57 0529, 1993: Raw cow milk for dairy factory treatment and processing. Praha, ČNI.
  17. ČSN 57 0538, 1998: Determination of freezing point in milk - cryoscope method. Czech Office for normalization and measurement, Prague.
  18. DEMOTT, B. J., 1969: Relationship of freezing point of milk to its specific gravity and concentration of lactose and choride. J. Dairy Sci., 52, 6, 882. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(69)86812-8 Go to original source...
  19. EEC 92/46, 1992: Council Directive: Milk and milk product quality. Official Journal, L 268, 14/9/1992, 1-32.
  20. EISSES, J., ZEE, B., 1980: The freezing point of autentic cow's milk and farm tank milk in the Netherlands. Neth. Milk Dairy J., 34, 162-180.
  21. FREEMAN, T. R., BUCY, J. L., 1967: Distribution of milk freezing points in authentic herd samples. J. Dairy Sci., 50, 6, 951.
  22. GASTEINER, J., 2000: Ketose, die bedeutendste Stoffwechselerkrankung der Milchkuh. In: BAL Gumpenstein Bericht, 27. Viehwirtschaftliche Fachtagung, Juni, 11-18.
  23. GASTEINER, J., 2003: Der Einsatz glukoplastischer Verbindungen in der Milchviehfütterung. In: BAL Gumpenstein Bericht, 30. Viehwirtschaftliche Fachtagung, April, 61-63.
  24. GEISHAUSER, T., ZIEBELL, K. L., 1995: Fett/Eiweiss-Quotient in der Milch von Rinderherden mit Vorkommen von Labmagenverlagerungen. Dtsch. Tierärztl. Wschr., 102, 469-494.
  25. GENČUROVÁ, V., HANUŠ, O., VYLETĚLOVÁ, M., LANDOVÁ, H., JEDELSKÁ, R., 2008: The relationships between goat and cow milk freezing point, milk composition and properties. Sci. Agric. Boh., 39, 4, 324-328.
  26. HANUŠ, O., BJELKA, M., HERING, P., KLIMEŠ, M., KOZÁKOVÁ, A., PODMOLÍKOVÁ, M., GENČUROVÁ, V., 2003a: Breeding and technological aspects of milk freezing point and prevention of incidental problems. (In Czech) Proceedings of seminar contributions of VÚCHS Rapotín: Breeding and technological aspects of milked cow rearing and milk quality, 81-97.
  27. HANUŠ, O., FRELICH, J., TOMÁŠKA, M., VYLETĚLOVÁ, M., GENČUROVÁ, V., KUČERA, J., TŘINÁCTÝ, J., 2010: The analysis of relationships between chemical composition, physical, technological and health indicators and freezing point in raw cow milk. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 55, 1, ISSN 1212-1819, 11-29. Go to original source...
  28. HANUŠ, O., GENČUROVÁ, V., KUČERA, J., VYLETĚLOVÁ, M., TŘINÁCTÝ, J., 2009: Analyse of relationships between freezing point and selected indicators of udder health state among cow, goat and sheep milk. Acta univ. agric. et silvic. Mendel. Brun., ISSN 1211-8516, LVII, 5, 103-110. DOI: 10.11118/actaun200957050103 Go to original source...
  29. HANUŠ, O., HANUŠOVÁ, K., VYLETĚLOVÁ, M., KOPEC, T., JANŮ, L., KOPECKÝ, J., 2011 a: Selected abiotic factors influencing raw cow milk freezing point depression. Acta Vet. Brno, in opponent procedure. Go to original source...
  30. HANUŠ, O., KLIMEŠ, M., MIHULA, P., KOZÁKOVÁ, A., JEDELSKÁ, R., 2003 b: Impacts of the sampling of milk and the basic milk treatment on its freezing point and other compositional parameters. (In Czech) Výzkum v chovu skotu, XLV, 164, 4, 10-17.
  31. HANUŠ, O., VYLETĚLOVÁ, M., TOMÁŠKA, M., SAMKOVÁ, E., GENČUROVÁ, V., JEDELSKÁ, R., KOPECKÝ, J., 2011 b: The effects of sample fat value manipulation on raw cow milk composition and indicators. Acta univ. agric. et silvic. Mendel. Brun., ISSN 1211-8516, LIX, 1, 2011, 101-112. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159010101 Go to original source...
  32. CHLÁDEK, G., ČEJNA, V., 2005: The relationships between freezing point of milk and milk components and their changes during lactation in Czech Pied and Holstein cows. (In Czech) Acta univ. agric. et silvic. Mendel. Brun., LIII, 5, 63-70. DOI: 10.11118/actaun200553050063 Go to original source...
  33. ILLEK, J., PECHOVÁ, A., 1997: The dairy cow metabolism disorders and milk quality. (In Czech) Farmář, 6, 29-30.
  34. ISO 5764:2002(E), IDF 108:2002(E) 2002: International standard. Milk - Determination of freezing point - Thermistor cryoscope method (Reference method) 15.
  35. JANŠTOVÁ, B., DRAČKOVÁ, M., NAVRÁTILOVÁ, P., HADRA, L., VORLOVÁ, L., 2007: Freezing point of raw and heat-treated goat milk. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 52, 11, 394-398. DOI: 10.17221/2324-CJAS Go to original source...
  36. JÍLEK, F., ŘEHÁK, D., VOLEK, J., ŠTÍPKOVÁ, M., NĚMCOVÁ, E., FIEDLEROVÁ, M., RAJMON, R., ŠVESTKOVÁ, D., 2006: Effect of herd, parity, stage of lactation and milk yield on urea concentration in milk. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 51, 12, 510-517. DOI: 10.17221/3971-CJAS Go to original source...
  37. KIRCHGESSNER, M., KREUZER, M., ROTH, MAIER, DORA, A., 1986: Milk urea and protein content to diagnose energy and protein malnutrition of dairy cows. Arch. Anim. Nutr., 36, 192-197. Go to original source...
  38. KIRCHGESSNER, M., ROTH, MAIER, DORA, A., RÖHRMOSER, G., 1985: Harnstoffgehalt in Milch von Kühen mit Energie- bzw. Proteinmangel und anschliessender Realimentation. Z. Tierphysiol. Tiernähr. Futterm. Kde., 53, 264-270. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.1985.tb00031.x Go to original source...
  39. KIRCHNEROVÁ, K., FOLTYS, V., 2005: The biochemical parameters of milk quality in relationship to freezing point. (In Slovak) Sborník: XXXII. Seminář o jakosti potravin a potravinových surovin. Brno MZLU, 17.
  40. KIRCHNEROVÁ, K., PEŠKOVIČOVÁ, D., FOLTYS, V., 2009: Statistical analysis of unsatisfactory milk freezing point using method of main components. (In Slovak) Sborník: XXXV. Seminář o jakosti potravin a potravinových surovin. ISBN 978-80-7375-281-1, Brno MZLU, 112-119.
  41. KLÍČNÍK, V., 1978: The technology of the animal products (Dairying). (In Czech) SPN, VŠZ Brno, 270.
  42. KOLOŠTA, M., 2003: Effect of pasture dairy cow nourishment level on the milk freezing point. (In Slovak) Mliekarstvo, 34, 3, 25-27.
  43. KOOPS, J., KERKHOF MOGOT, M. F., VAN HEMERT, H., 1989: Routine testing of farm tank milk by infra-red analysis. IV Prediction of the freezing-point depression from infra-red measurements and conductivity. Neth. Milk Dairy J., 43, 3-16.
  44. KOPUNECZ, P., 2010: Quality survey of purchased milk in 2009. (In Czech) ČMSCH a. s., January, Praha.
  45. KOVÁŘOVÁ, K., LEDVINKA, Z., SAMEK, M., VOJÁČEK, P., 2005: The trend functions and correlation regressional relationships of milk quality parameters. (In Czech) Sborník: XXXII. seminář o jakosti potravin a potravinových surovin. Brno MZLU, 20.
  46. KUPKA, K., 1997: Statistical control of quality. (In Czech) TriloByte. ISBN 80-238-1818-X, 119.
  47. MACEK, A., HANUŠ, O., GENČUROVÁ, V., VYLETĚLOVÁ, M., KOPECKÝ, J., 2008: The relations of sheep's and cow's freezing point of milk to its composition and properties. Sci. Agric. Boh., 39, 4, 329-334.
  48. MELOUN, M., MILITKÝ, J., 1992: Statistical processing of experimental data by personal computer. (In Czech) Díl IIA, Pardubice, 102.
  49. MELOUN, M., MILITKÝ, J., 1994: Statistical processing of experimental data. (In Czech) Plus spol. s r.o..
  50. MILCHPRÜFRING BAYERN: Tätigkeitsbericht, 1993, 1994 and 1995.
  51. ORDER 638/2004 about veterinary demands on milk and milk products (In Czech).
  52. ORDER 1234/2007 (In Czech).
  53. PECHOVÁ, A., ILLEK, J., PAVLATA, L., 2000: Factor affecting the fat concentration in cow milk. (In Czech) Veterinářství, 6, 238-241.
  54. RASMUSSEN, M. D., BJERRING, M., 2005: Development of bulk milk quality from herds with automatic milking system. 26th-28th April, ICAR Technical Series - No 10, Physiological and Technical Aspects of Machine Milking, Nitra, Slovak Republic, ISSN 1563-2504, ISBN 92-95014-07-3, 71-86.
  55. REGULATION 203/2003 Coll. about veterinary demands on milk and milk products.
  56. REGULATION (EC) No. 853/2004.
  57. ROHM, H., PLESCHBERGER, C., FOISSY, F., 1991: Der Gefrierpunkt pasteurisierter Milch in Österreich. Ernährung/Nutrition, 15, 11/12, 667-671.
  58. ROUBAL, P., KOPUNECZ, P., PEŠINOVÁ, H., et al., 2004, 2005: The evaluation of the raw milk quality in the central laboratories in the Czech Republic in 2003 and 2004. (In Czech) SCL pro hodnocení jakosti mléka, Praha, April and June, 19.
  59. ROUBAL, P., SNÁŠELOVÁ, J., BUCHVALDKOVÁ, T., 2004: The freezing point of the raw and heat treated cow milk. (In Czech) Proceeding of seminar contributions of VÚCHS Rapotín: The actual problems of management in the cattle keeping, 71-76.
  60. ŘEHÁK, D., RAJMON, R., KUBEŠOVÁ, M., ŠTÍPKOVÁ, M., VOLEK, J., JÍLEK, F., 2009: Relationships between milk urea and production and fertility traits in Holstein dairy herds in the Czech Republic. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 54, 5, 193-200. Go to original source...
  61. SCHULZ, T., 1997: Ohne formeln und Tabellen die Leistung gesteigert. Top Agrar, 5, 20-22.
  62. TOMÁŠKA, M., HOFERICOVÁ, M., KOLOŠTA, M., 2005: The measurement of equivalent of milk freezing point. (In Slovak) Mliekarstvo, 36, 4, 7-9.
  63. WALSTRA, P., JENNESS, R., 1984: Dairy Chemistry and Physics, New York - Chichester - Brisbane - Toronto - Singapore.
  64. WIEDEMANN, M., BUCHBERGER, J., KLOSTERMEYER, H., 1993: Ursachen für anomale Gefrierpunkte der Rohmilch. 1 und 2. Mitteilung, 114, 22, 634-644, 23, 656-663.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.