Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2011, 59(3), 81-90 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159030081
The effect of some cultivation conditions on properties of leaves of the container-produced species Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn
- 1 Ústav zelinářství a květinářství, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice, Česká republika
- 2 Ústav šlechtění a množení zahradnických plodin, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice, Česká republika
Plants differ in their reactions to unfavourable environmental conditions and the effect of the acting factors directly and indirectly results in changes in a number of plants organs. The leaves are vegetative organs and as such they are completely exposed to external conditions. Most markedly these conditions affect the assimilative organs. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of four substrates and two sites differing in light intensity on the leaf morphology of the model plant species Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. The used substrates were the commercial peat-bark substrate (RKS II), sand and bark substrate. With these substrates the soil conditioner TerraCottem was applied at a rate of 5 g per one litre of the substrate. The experimental plants were grown in 2-litre containers. The focus of evaluations of the individual treatments was on some leaf properties. TerraCottem showed that it had a positive effect also on the leaf area ratio and on leaf efficiency. The number of leaves varied. The effect of the substrate and of the light intensity was identical; the latter parameter was strongly correlated with leaf weight. The shape of the leaves (leaf length/width ratio) and the SLA index responded to the different light intensities. Other parameters were calculated from the results of the measured values which specified in greater detail the effect of the year, media, hydro absorbent and light. Treatments A3 (1 697.60 mm2) and a conrol (1 708.10 mm2) had the smallest leave area. These two treatmens significantly statistically differed frome those in the shade location. In the 2005 year the highest values were measured at the treatment B1 (41.22 m2.kg-1). Next year the values of the SLA were similar.
Keywords: Alnus glutinosa, leaves, light intensity, hydro absorbent, RKS II, sand, bark substrate
Received: February 18, 2011; Published: June 14, 2014 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- ABEDI-KOUPAI, J., SOHRAB, F. and SWARBRICK, G., 2008: Evaluation of hydrogel application on soil water retention characteristics. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 31, 2: 317-331. ISSN 0190-4167. DOI: 10.1080/01904160701853928
Go to original source...
- BUNT, A. C., 1988: Media and mixes for container-grown plants. 2nd edition. Unwin Hyman, London, 309 s. ISBN 0-04-635016-0.
- EVANS, J. R. and POORTER, H., 2001: Photosynthetic acclimation of plants to growth irradiance: the relative importance of specific leaf area and nitrogen partitioning in maximizing carbon gain. Plant, Cell and Environment. 24, 755-767. ISSN 0140-7791. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00724.x
Go to original source...
- JURIK, T. W., CHABOT, J. F. and CHABOT, B. F., 1982: Effects of Light and Nutrients on Leaf Size, CO2 Exchange, and Anatomy in Wild Strawberry (Fragaria virginiana). Plant Physiology. 70, 1044-1048. DOI: 10.1104/pp.70.4.1044
Go to original source...
- NIINEMETS, Ü. and KULL, K., 1994: Leaf weight per area and leaf size of 85 Estonian woody species in relation to shade tolerance and light availability. Forest Ecology and Management. 70, 1-3: 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(94)90070-1
Go to original source...
- PALLARDY, S. G., 2008: Physiology of woody plants. 3rd edition. Elsevier, Burlington, 454 s. ISBN 978-0-12-088765-1.
- RAVIV, M., WALLACH, R., SILBER, A. and BAR-TAL, A., 2002: Substrates and their analysis. In: Savvas, D. and Passam, H. (ed.) Hydroponic Production of Vegetables and Ornamentals. Embryo Publications, Athens, p. 25-102. ISBN 960-8002-12-5.
- REIS, M. and COELHO, L., 2007: Compost mixes as substrates for seedling production. Acta Horticulturae 747: VIII International Symposium on Protected Cultivation in Mild Winter Climates: Advances in Soil and Soilless Cultivation under Protected Environment. Agadir, Morocco, p. 283-291. ISBN 978-90-66055-00-1, ISSN 0567-7572.
- ŠANTRŮČEK J., 1998: Vodní režim rostlin. In: Procházka, S., Macháčková, I., Krekule, J., Šebánek, J. et al. Fyziologie rostlin. Academia, Praha. 1998, s. 71. ISBN 80-200-0586-2.
- SINGH, D. and VAN COTTHEM, W., 2002: Soil conditioner helps to sustain yields. Appropriate Technology. 29, 3: 52-53. ISSN 0305 0920.
- VARES, A., 2000: Vertical variation of leaf size and weight per area in 21-year-old black alder plantations. Journal Metsanduslikud Uurimused. 32: 73-77.
- VEEN, van der, R. and MEIJER, G., 1962: Light and plant growth. Centrex Publishing Company, Eindhoven, 162 s. U.D.C. 581.035.
- VIEIRA, M. A., CORVELHO, W. B. V. and FERREIRA, A. A. F., 2005: Use of conditioning polymer in ornamental pepper seedlings production. Acta Horticulturae 683: V International Symposium on New Floricultural Crops. Paranŕ, Brazil, p. 411-415. ISBN 978-90-66056-58-9, ISSN 0567-7572.
Go to original source...
- XING HUA, H., JIEWEI, LI, QIAOSHENG, J. and ZRUIFENG, Z., 2010: Responses of leaf characters of Camellia nitidissima to different light environments. Guangxi Zhiwu/Guihaia. 30, 3: 355-361.
- XU, F. GUO, W., XU, W., WEI, Y. and WANG, R., 2009: Leaf morphology correlates with water and light availability: What consequences for simple and compound leaves? Progress in Natural Science, 19: 1789-1798. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2009.10.001
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.