Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2023, 71(5), 283-296
Effectiveness of the Use of Automatic Driving Systems in Technological Processes of Crop Cultivation in the Northern Region of Kazakhstan
- 1 Kostanay branch of Scientific production center of agricultural engineering, LLP, Abay Ave., 34, 110000 Kostanay, Republic of Kazakhstan
- 2 A. Baitursynov Kostanay State University, Baitursynov, 47, 110000 Kostanay, Republic of Kazakhstan
This study aims to identify the influencing factors and assess the efficiency of implementing automatic driving systems in the key processes of cultivating agricultural crops in the zonal conditions of the region. The research methods included field testing of machine-tractor units equipped with automatic driving systems during the main technological processes of crop cultivation, considering factors such as the specified precision of the automatic driving system, the constructive working width of the machine, the speed of the unit, the operator's qualification, and the soil conditions.
It was found that the use of automatic driving systems leads to a reduction in overlap values between adjacent passes of the unit by 3 to 20 times compared to driving without the systems. Moreover, technological and technical indicators showed enhancements ranging from 2.0% to 3.8% during sowing, 4.7% to 6.1% during main tillage, 4.6% to 22.1% during chemical treatment of crops, and 3.4% to 9.9% during crop harvesting. Additionally, it was observed that driving accuracy decreases with increasing speed and low qualification of the operator. The influence of the constructive working width requires further investigation. The impact of soil and climatic conditions on the effectiveness of using automatic driving systems was not established in our current research.
Keywords: precision agriculture, comparative tests, automatic driving system, technological processes, sowing, chemical weeding, grain harvesting, deep soil tillage
Received: April 19, 2023; Revised: September 22, 2023; Accepted: October 2, 2023; Published: November 1, 2023 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- ANTAMONOVA, L. 2017. Fearless and Flawless: How to Start Working with Precision Farming System [in Russian: Без страха и огреха. Как правильно начать работать по системе точного земледелия]. Zerno, 4: 164-165.
- BAROCCO, R. 2017. Yield Mapping Hardware Components for Grains and Cotton Using On-the-Go Monitoring Systems. The Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, UF/IFAS Extension, 2017(3): 12.
Go to original source...
- DOSPEHOV, B. A. 1985. Methods of field experience [in Russian: Методика полевого опыта]. Moscow: Agropromizdat.
- FEDORENKO, V. F. and VORONKOV, V. F. 2015. Experimental studies of elements of precision farming systems in Krasnodar Krai. Machinery and Equipment for Rural Area, 12: 12-16.
- MATRITCA. 2019. From Precision Agriculture to Smart Farms [in Russian: От точного земледелия до ]. Matritca, 17 May 2019 [online]. Available at: https://matritca.kz/old/news/62674-ot-tochnogo-zemledeliya-do-umnyh-ferm.html [Accessed: 2023, March 30].
- FULTON, J. P., BROOKE, A., WINSTEAD, A. et al. 2010. Yield monitoring and mapping. Precision Agriculture Series - Timely Information. Agriculture, Natural Resources & Forestry, Alabama Cooperative Extension System, pp. 2.
- GARCIA, L. C., VAN DER MEER, R. W., DE SOUZA, N. M. et al. 2016. Seeding maneuvers using navigation system. Engenharia Agricola, 36(2): 361-366.
Go to original source...
- KELC, D., STAJNKO, D., BERK, P. et al. 2019. Reduction of environmental pollution by using RTK-navigation in soil cultivation. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 12(5): 173-178.
Go to original source...
- KESKIN, M., HAN, Y. J. and DODD, R. B. 1999. A review of yield monitoring instrumentation applied to the combine harvesters for precision agriculture purposes. In: 7th International Congress on Agricultural Mechanization and Energy. Adana, Turkey, 26-27 May, pp. 426-431.
- LICHMAN, G. A. 2011. Reasons Inhibiting the Adoption of Precision Farming Technology in Russia [in Russian: Причины, сдерживающие применение технологии точного земледелия в России]. In: Innovative Technologies and New-Generation Equipment - the Basis for Agricultural Modernization: Collection of Scientific Reports from the International Scientific and Technical Conference. 05-06 October, Moscow, pp. 230-239.
- MEES, M. and HEDTRICH, J. 2019. Sheepskin and Manufacture [in Russian: Овчинка и выделка]. New Agriculture, 6: 38-40.
- POLISHCHUK, Y. V., ASTAFYEV, V. L., DEREPASKIN, A. I. et al. 2021. Impacts of automatic and parallel driving systems on the productivity of machine-tractor units in the northern region of the Republic of Kazachstan. Acta Technologica Agriculturae, 24(3): 143-149.
Go to original source...
- SEMIZOROV, S. A. 2015. Effectiveness of using satellite navigation systems for sowing crops. Agro-food policy in Russia, 10: 31-34.
- SHPAAR, D., ZAKHARCHENKO, A. V., YAKUSHEV, V. P. 2009. Precision agriculture. St. Petersburg: Pushkin.
- SOLOVYEV, S. A., LYUBCHICH, V. A., POPOV, S. V. et al. 2016. Efficiency of Technological operations in precision farming equipment usage [in Russian: Эффективность технологических операций использования техники в точном земледелии]. Proceedings of the All-Russian Research Technological Institute for Maintenance and Operation of Machinery and Tractor Fleet, 122: 8-12.
- STATE STANDARD. 2009. Machinery for crop protection. Spraying equipment. Test methods. GOST R 53053-2008. Moscow: FGUP Standardinform.
- STATE STANDARD. 2010. Agricultural machinery. Economic appraisal method. ST RK GOST R 53056-2010. Astana: Committee for Technical Regulation and Metrology of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
- STATE STANDARD. 2013. Testing of agricultural tractors and machines. Procedure for determination of test conditions. GOST 20915-2011. Moscow: FGUP Standardinform.
- STATE STANDARD. 2014. Navigational and dataware system of coordinate agriculture. Terms and definitions. GOST R 56084-2014. Moscow: FGUP Standardinform.
- STATE STANDARD. 2016. Grain harvesters. Test methods. GOST 28301-2015. Minsk: Eurasian Council for standardization, Metrology and certification.
- STATE STANDARD. 2017a. Agricultural machinery. Machines for deep tillage. Test methods. GOST 33736-2016. Moscow: FGUP Standardinform.
- STATE STANDARD. 2017b. Agricultural machinery. Methods of operational-technological evaluation. GOST 24055-2016. Moscow: FGUP Standardinform.
- STATE STANDARD. 2018. Seeders tractor. Test methods. GOST 31345-2017. Moscow: FGUP Standardinform.
- TSIRULEV, A. P., BOROVKOVA, A. S., IKSANOV, M. R. et al. 2008. Implementation of the project on the development of a methodology for the use of precision land tools for monitoring agricultural land in the Samara region [in Russian: Реализация проекта по разработке методики использования средств точного земледелия для мониторинга сельскохозяйственных угодий Cамарской области]: report on the implementation of scientific and technical work (interim). Kinel: Foundation for Agricultural Education, 68 p.
- YAKUSHEV, V. P. and YAKUSHEV, V. V. 2007. Information support of precision farming: monograph [in Russian: Информационное обеспечение точного земледелия: монография]. St. Petersburg: PIYaF RAN.
- YAKUSHEV, V. V. 2016. Precision Agriculture: Theory and Practice [in Russian: Точное земледелие: теория и практика]. St. Petersburg: FGBNU AFI.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.