Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2023, 71(3), 141-153 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun.2023.010

Erosion and the Economic Evaluation of the Conservation Grassland as an Existing Effective Tool to Reduce Erosion

Ivo Horák1, Petr Marada2
1 Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělska 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Problem with soil erosion has not yet been satisfactorily solved with a holistic approach through a precisely targeted and duly explained strategic plan in the Czech Republic. Even though there are effective means to undertake needed measures, conservation grassland being one of them. The research aims to contribute to the debate that concerns battling soil erosion in Czech conditions. The idea of conservation grassland as an effective tool to battle soil erosion is well-known by the experts and farmers alike. Although there has been a discussion on what should be the extent of conservation grassland on a country-level in Czech conditions, there still has not been enough vigour to push the idea forth. We set two research questions. Firstly, what should be the total volume of agricultural land that should undergo the conservation grassland. Secondly, how to adjust subsidy scheme for making the conservation grassland as erosion protection economically viable for the farmers. We provide answers with holistic analysis of all Land Parcel Blocks (LPB) in 2016-2021 period where the erosion events were analysed, and the Erosion Hazard Classes (TEO) were considered too. We concluded that if we take into the account a five-year project according to 2023-2027 Common Agricultural Policy scheme, more than CZK 3.4 billion worth of soil could be saved if 103,428.4 hectares were grassed. For a conventional farmer, additional subsidy scheme would have to be presented to compensate farmer's expenses for implementing the conservation grassland that secures an anti-erosion ecosystem service and other ecosystem services as well.

Keywords: erosion, economic evaluation, conservation grassland, ecosystem services

Received: March 7, 2023; Revised: June 5, 2023; Accepted: June 6, 2023; Published: July 1, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Horák, I., & Marada, P. (2023). Erosion and the Economic Evaluation of the Conservation Grassland as an Existing Effective Tool to Reduce Erosion. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 71(3), 141-153. doi: 10.11118/actaun.2023.010
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BENGTSSON, J. et al. 2019. Grasslands-more important for ecosystem services than you might think. Ecosphere, 10: e02582. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1002/ecs2.2582 Go to original source...
    2. BORRELLI, P., ROBINSON, D. A., PANAGOS P., LUGATO E., YANG, J. E., ALEWELL, C., WUEPPER, D., MONTANARELLA, L. and BALLABIO, C. 2020. Land use and climate change impacts on global soil erosion by water (2015-2070). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A, 117(36): 21994-22001. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2001403117 Go to original source...
    3. BRAAT, L. C. and DE GROOT, R. 2012. The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosystem Services, 1(1): 4-15. Go to original source...
    4. BRÁZDA, J., KAPIČKA, J. and NOVOTNÝ, I. 2021. Update of the erosion risk layer of agricultural soils: description of the calculation methodology. Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation (VUMOP).
    5. DE GROOT, R., BRANDER, L. and SOLOMONIDES, S. 2020. Ecosystem Services Valuation Database (ESVD). Version December 2020.
    6. DENG, X., LI, Z. and GIBSON, J. 2016. A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management. J. Geog. Sci., 26: 953-968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1309-9 Go to original source...
    7. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2008. Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Structural Funds, Cohesion Fund and Instrument for Pre-Accession. Final Report. Directorate General Regional Policy, European Commission. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/cost/guide2008_en.pdf
    8. FAOSTAT. 2019. Crops and livestock products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [online]. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
    9. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, THE STATE AGRICULTURAL INTERVENTION FUND. 2018. Nejčastěji kladené dotazy LPIS. Available at: https://www.szif.cz/cs/CmDocument?rid=%2Fapa_anon%2Fcs%2Fdokumenty_ke_stazeni%2Fnejcastejsi_dotazy%2Flpis%2F1527160825249.pdf
    10. FOLEY, J. A. et al. 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478: 337-342. Go to original source...
    11. GEBHART, M., DUMBROVSKÝ, M., ©ARAPATKA, B. et al. 2023. Evaluation of Monitored Erosion Events in the Context of Characteristics of Source Areas in Czech Conditions. Agronomy, 13: 256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010256 Go to original source...
    12. GRANATSTEIN, D. 1992. Dryland Farming in the Northwestern United States: A Nontechnical Overview. Washington State University Cooperative Extension, Pullman.
    13. HERWEG, K. et al. 2010. Transdisciplinarity - an option for applied landscape ecology in complex and uncertain contexts. Die Erde; Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Erdkunde zu Berlin, 141(4): 321-339.
    14. HORÁK, I. and MARADA, P. 2022. Economic Evaluation of the Selected Ecologically Significant Element in Agriculture. Acta Universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 70(4-5): 295-306. Go to original source...
    15. HUBER, R., LE'CLEC'H, S., BUCHMANN, N. et al. 2022. Economic value of three grassland ecosystem services when managed at the regional and farm scale. Sci. Rep., 12: 4194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08198-w Go to original source...
    16. KANITO, D. and FEYISSA, S. 2021. Comparison and Applicability of Selected Soil Erosion Estimation Models. Hydrology, 9(4): 79-87. DOI: 10.11648/j.hyd.20210904.12 Go to original source...
    17. KONEČNÁ, J., PRA®AN, J. et al. 2014. Assessment of the economic aspects of anti-erosion protection of agricultural soil. Certified Methodology. Brno: VÚMOP, v.v.i.
    18. KUHWALD, M., FRITJOF, B., SAGGAU, P., DUTTMANN, R. 2022. Is soil loss due to crop harvesting the most disregarded soil erosion process? A review of harvest erosion, Soil and Tillage Research, 215: 105213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105213 Go to original source...
    19. MANNING, P. et al. 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat. Ecol. Evolut., 2: 427-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017- 0461-7 Go to original source...
    20. MUELLER, N. D. et al. 2012. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature, 490: 254-257. Go to original source...
    21. MAAZ, T. et al. 2018. Economic, policy, and social trends and challenges of introducing oilseed and pulse crops into dryland wheat cropping systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 253: 177-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.018 Go to original source...
    22. OLDEMAN, L. R. 1998. Soil degradation: A threat to food security? Report 98/01; International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
    23. PIMENTEL, D. and BURGESS, M. 2013. Soil Erosion Threatens Food Production. Agriculture, 3(3): 443-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture3030443 Go to original source...
    24. PRASUHN, V. 2020. Twenty years of soil erosion on-farm measurement: Annual variation, spatial distribution and the impact of conservation programmes for soil loss rates in Switzerland. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 45: 1539-1554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4829 Go to original source...
    25. JANEČEK, M., DOSTÁL, T., KOZLOVSKY DUFKOVÁ, J. et al. 2012. Protection of agricultural land from erosion. Praha: Powerprint. ISBN 978-80-87415-42-9
    26. RENARD, K. G., LAFLEN, J. M., FOSTER, G. R., and McCOOL, D. K. 1994. The Revised Soil Loss Equation. pp. 105-126. In: LAL, R. (ed.). Soil Erosion Research Methods. Conservation Society, Ankeny. Go to original source...
    27. RENARD, K. G., FOSTER, G. R., WEESIES, G. A. and PORTER, J. P. 1997. RUSLE: revised universal soil loss equation. J. Soil Water Conserv, 46: 30-33.
    28. RUYSSCHAERT, G., J., POESEN, G., VERSTRAETEN, G. and GOVERS, G. 2007. Soil loss due to harvesting of various crop types in contrasting agro-ecological environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 120(2-4): 153-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.08.012 Go to original source...
    29. CAP Strategic Plan for the period 2023-2027. CCI: 2023CZ06AFSP00. Decision made by the EC: 24/11/2022
    30. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE. 2021. Soil [in Czech: Půda]. eAgri [online]. Available at: https://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/puda/ ochrana-pudy-a-krajiny/degradace-pud/vodni-eroze-pudy/
    31. VOPRAVIL, J. 2014. Evaluation of the influence of organic matter balance on the soil erodibility factor K for individual HPJ. Subreport for the Anti-Erosion Calculator solution.
    32. VOPRAVIL, J. 2006. New determination of soil erodibility factor K for individual HPJ and soils of the Czech Republic. In: Erosion. Prague: CTU in Prague.
    33. TROEH, F. R., HOBBS, J. A. and DONAHUE, R. L. 199. Soil and Water Conservation. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
    34. TROEH, F. R., HOBBS, A. H. and DONAHUE, R. L. 2004. Soil and Water Conservation: For Productivity and Environmental Protection. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
    35. WAINAINA, P., GITUKU, E. and MINANG, P. 2020. An exploratory study of cost-benefit analysis of landscape restoration. Working Paper number 306. Nairobi, Kenya: World Agroforestry. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5716/WP20014.PDF Go to original source...
    36. WISCHMEIER, W. H. and SMITH D. D. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: guide to conservation planning. USDA, Agriculture Handbook 537. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
    37. WUEPPER, D., BORRELLI, P. and FINGER, R. 2020 Countries and the global rate of soil erosion. Nat. Sustain., 3: 51-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0438-4 Go to original source...
    38. YUN X., HONGHONG L., YU Y. and XIAOYU R. 2019. Changes in soil erosion in cropland in northeastern China over the past 300 years. CATENA, 176: 410-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.01.026 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content