Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2022, 70(2), 83-95 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun.2022.008

Suitability of Using Mechanization Means for the Maintenance of Grass Stands by the Method of Mulching

Luboš Staněk1, Tomáš Krajíček2, Tomáš Dvořák1
1 Department of Engineering, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

This study aims to provide comprehensive and practical information on particular mechanization means used in the maintenance of permanent grass stands, namely grass cutting technologies without the collection of cut grass biomass - mulching. A sample consisting of six machines classified into three categories (uniaxial tool carriers, single-axle small tractors, cutting machines with a zero turning radius) was tested in practice and functional and operational aspects of the machines were studied on different localities of permanent grass stands. Data measured in the individual machines were used to calculate consumption [l/ha], consumption [l/mth], consumption [l/l of cut biomass] or performance [ha/hour]. The measurements took place on two sites: a site with the permanent grass stand unkempt for a long time and a site regularly maintained by mulching. The study was conducted in the cadastral area of Ostrava City situated in the NE part of the Czech Republic.

Results of the study show that the total fuel consumption [l/ha] in the individual mowing machines always at all times higher on plots that were unkempt for a long time. The overall comparison of fuel consumption [l/mth] of the individual types of cutting machines between the localities showed that nearly all tested cutting machines had a higher consumption on sites with permanent grass stands unkempt for a long time. The performance [ha/h] of all cutting machines was higher on the sites that were regularly maintained by mulching in the past.

Keywords: grass cutting, mulching, maintenance of grass stands, permanent grass stand, grass stand, grass mower

Received: January 19, 2022; Revised: April 4, 2022; Accepted: April 13, 2022; Published: May 1, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Staněk, L., Krajíček, T., & Dvořák, T. (2022). Suitability of Using Mechanization Means for the Maintenance of Grass Stands by the Method of Mulching. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 70(2), 83-95. doi: 10.11118/actaun.2022.008
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AGRIA MOTOROVÉ STROJE. 2002. Operating instructions Agria - hydrostatic tool carrier Type 5900 Taifun [in Czech: Návod k obsluze Agria - hydrostatický nosič nářadí Typ 5900 Taifun]. Operating Instructions No. 998 321 03.02 CZ. Agria.
    2. AGROCAR S.R.O. 2021. Hammer mulchers Humus [in Czech: Kladívkové mulčovače Humus]. Agrocar. [Online]. Available at: http://www.agrocar.cz/technika-v-detailech/mulcovace-humus/kladivkovemulcovace [Accessed: 2021, June 6].
    3. AGROCAR S.R.O. 2021. Humus safety mulchers [in Czech: Bezpečnostní mulčovače Humus]. Agrocar. Available at: http://www.agrocar.cz/technika-v-detailech/mulcovacehumus/bezpecnostni-mulcovace [Accessed: 2021, June 6].
    4. AGROCAR S.R.O. 2021. Uniaxial tool carriers Rapid [in Czech: Jednoosé nosiče nářadí Rapid]. Agrocar. Available at: http://www.agrocar.cz/technika-v-detailech/jednoose-nosice-naradi-rapid [Accessed: 2021, June 6].
    5. BEARD, J. B. and EATON, J. 1973. Reel versus rotary mower comparisons. In: Michigan State Univ. Turfgrass Res. Summary. Michigan State University, p. 5-6.
    6. BREDE, D. 2000. Turfgrass maintenance reduction handbook: Sports, lawns, and golf. Chelsea, MI: Sleeping Bear Press.
    7. BRIGGS & STRATTON AG. 2012. European engines 2014. Altendorf: BRIGGS & STRATTON AG.
    8. BUSSIERE, F. and CELLIER, P. 1994. Modification of the soil temperature and water content regimes by a crop residue mulch: experiment and modelling. Agric. For. Meteorol., 68(1-2): 1-28. Go to original source...
    9. CZELUŚCIŃSKI, W., JANKOWSKI, K., SOSNOWSKI, J. et al. 2017. Effects of trinexapac-ethyl on turfgrass growth and frequency of mowing. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 15(3): 739-746. Go to original source...
    10. ČEDÍK, J. and PEXA, K. J. 2015. Mulcher energy intensity measurement in dependence on performance. Agronomy Research, 13(1): 46-52.
    11. DENGLER, J., JANISOVÁ, M., TÖRÖK, P. et al. 2014. Biodiversity of Palaearctic grasslands: a synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 182: 1-14. Go to original source...
    12. DOMAŃSKI, P. J. and ANDRZEJEWSKA, J., IWICKI, R. 2011. Effect of utilization intensity on growth of lawn cultivars of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.). Acta. Sci. Pol. Agricultura, 10(3): 15-26.
    13. GÄRDENFORS, U. et al. 2010. Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2010 - The 2010 redlist of Swedish species. Uppsala: ArtDatabanken, SLU.
    14. GONZALEZ, A. and LOREAU, M. 2009. The causes and consequences of compensatory dynamics in ecological communities. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 40: 393-414. Go to original source...
    15. GROSSI, N., FONTANELLI, M., GARRAMONE, E. et al. 2016. Autonomous mower saves energy and improves quality of tall fescue lawn. HortTechnology, 26(6): 825-830. Go to original source...
    16. HANSSON, M. and FOGELFORS, H. 2000. Management of a semi-natural grassland; results from a 15-year-old experiment in southern Sweden. J Veg Sci., 11: 31-38. Go to original source...
    17. HECKMAN, J. R., LIU, H., HILL, W. et al. 1999. Kentucky bluegrass responses to mowing practice and nitrogen fertility management. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 15(4): 25-33. Go to original source...
    18. HICKS, R. W. and HALL, E. L. 2000. Survey of robot lawn mowers. In: Intelligent Robots and Computer Vision XIX: Algorithms, Techniques, and Active Vision. Proceedings Vol. 4197. Intelligent Systems and Smart Manufacturing, 2000, Boston, MA, United States, pp. 262-269. Go to original source...
    19. HUHTA, A-P., RAUTIO, P., TUOMI, J. et al. 2001. Restorative mowing on an abandoned semi-natural meadow: short-term and predicted long-term effects. J Veg Sci., 12: 677-686. Go to original source...
    20. HUMBERT, J-Y., GHAZOUL, J. and WALTER, T. 2009. Meadow harvesting techniques and their impacts on field fauna. Agric Ecosystems & Environt, 130(1-2): 1-8. Go to original source...
    21. CHISTENSEN, A., WESTERHOLM, R. and ALMÉN, J. 2001. Measurement of regulated and unregulated exhaust emissions from a lawn mower with and without an oxidizing catalyst: a comparison of two different fuels. Environmental Science and Technology, 35: 2166-2170. Go to original source...
    22. CHUNG, S. O. and HORTON, R. 1987. Soil heat and water flow with a partial surface mulch. Water Resour. Res., 23(12): 2175-2186. Go to original source...
    23. JANKOWSKI, K., CZELUŚCIŃSKI, W., JANKOWSKA, J. et al. 2012b. Effect of various doses of mushoom's refuse on the regrowth degree of turf lawns [in Polish: Wpływ zróżnicowanej dawki odpadu popieczarkowego na stopień odrostu muraw trawnikowych]. Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin. Agric., Aliment., Pisc., Zootech., 296(23): 35-42.
    24. JANKOWSKI, K., JANKOWSKA, J. and SOSNOWSKI, J. 2012a. Estimation of turf lawns regrowth with tufted haigrass share [in Polish: Ocena odrastania muraw trawnikowych z udziałem śmiałka darniowego]. Folia Pomer. Univ. Technol. Stetin. Agric., Aliment., Pisc., Zootech., 295(22): 21-28.
    25. JANKOWSKI, K., SOSNOWSKI, J., TRUBA, M. et al. 2017. Impact of soil conditioners and weather on lawn compactness. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 15(4): 1917-1928. Go to original source...
    26. JOHANSSON, L. J., HALL, K., PRENTICE, H. C. et al. 2008. Semi-natural grassland continuity, long-term land-use change and plant species richness in an agricultural landscape on Öland, Sweden. Landsc Urb Plan, 84: 200-211. Go to original source...
    27. JOHANSSON, O. and HEDIN, P. 1991. Restaurering av Ängs- och hagmarker. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket.
    28. JUNKER, M., KASPER, M., RÖÖSLI, M. et al. 2000. Airborne particle number profiles, particle mass distributions and particle-bound PAH concentrations within the city environment of Basel: an assessment as part of the BRISKA project. Atmospheric Environment, 34(19): 3171-3181. Go to original source...
    29. KARA, E., SÜRMEN, M. and ERDOĞAN, H. 2020. Effects of mowing height and biogas digestate as a soil amendment on green quality of strong creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra var. rubra). Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 1(2): 72-76.
    30. KARL, T., FALL, R., JORDAN, A. et al. 2001. W. On-line analysis of reactive VOCs from urban lawn mowing. Environmental Science and Technology, 35(14): 2926-2931. Go to original source...
    31. KAŹMIERCZAKOWA, R. 1992. Skład florystyczny i biomasa runi nie użytkowanych łąk pienińskich oraz zmiany wywołane jednorazowym skoszeniem. Pieniny. Przyroda i Człowiek, 2: 13-24.
    32. KELEMEN, A., TÖRÖK, P., VALKÓ, O. et al. 2014. Sustaining recovered grasslands is not likely without proper management: vegetation changes after cessation of mowing. Biodiversity Conservation, 23(3): 741-751. Go to original source...
    33. KIRSTINE, W., GALBALLY, I., YE, Y. et al. 1998. Emissions of volatile organic compounds (primarily oxygenated species) from pasture. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(D9): 10605-10619. Go to original source...
    34. KNOT, P. 2013. Clipping management and its effect on the composition and height of low-input turf. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun., 6(6): 1741-1747. Go to original source...
    35. KNOT, P. et al. 2017. Effect of mulching and mowing on species diversity of low-input lawns. In: Grassland resources for extensive farming systems in marginal lands: major drivers and future scenarios. Proceedings of the 19th Symposium of the European Grassland Federation. Alghero, Italy, 7-10 May 2017, pp. 576-578, ref. 4.
    36. LEE, H., BREMER, D. J., SU, K. et al. 2011. Relationships between Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and Visual Quality in Turfgrasses: Effects of Mowing Height. Crop Science, 51(1): 323-332. Go to original source...
    37. LIIRA, J., ISSAK, M., JÕGAR, Ü. et al. 2009. Restoration management of a floodplain meadow and its cost-effectiveness: the results of a 6-year experiment. Ann. Bot. Fenn., 46(5): 397-408. Go to original source...
    38. LOYDI, A., ECKSTEIN, R. L., OTTE, A. et al. 2013. Effects of litter seedling establishment in natural and semi-natural grasslands: a meta-analysis. J Ecol, 101(2): 454-464. Go to original source...
    39. MARRS, R. H., SNOW, C. S. R., OWEN, K. M. and EVANS, C. E. 1998. Heathland and acid grassland creation on arable soils at Minsmere: identification of potential problems and a test of cropping to impoverish soils. Biol Conserv, 85(1-2): 69-82. Go to original source...
    40. MILBERG, P., AKOTO, B. and BERGMAN, K-O. et al. 2014. Is spring burning a viable management tool for species-rich grasslands? Appl. Veg. Sci., 17(3): 429-441. Go to original source...
    41. MOHAMOUD, Y. M. and EWING, L. K. 1990. Rainfall interception by corn and soybean residue. Trans. ASAE, 33(2): 507-511. Go to original source...
    42. MOVAHEDI NAENI, S. A. R. and COOK, H. F. 2000. Influence of municipal compost on temperature, water, nutrient status and the yield of maize in a temperate soil. Soil Use Manage., 16(3), 215-221. Go to original source...
    43. MUNSHAW, G. 2013. Mowing your kentucky lawn. AGR-209. Univ. of Kentucky, College of Agr., Food and Environ.
    44. PIRCHIO, M. et al. 2018. Autonomous Rotary Mower versus Ordinary Reel Mower-Effects of Cutting Height and Nitrogen Rate on Manila Grass Turf Quality. HortTechnology, 28(4): 509-515. Go to original source...
    45. PREVÉY, J. S., KNOCHEL, D. G. and SEASTEDT, T. R. 2014. Mowing reduces exotic annual grasses but increases exotic forbs in a semiarid grassland. Restoration Ecology, 22(6): 774-781. Go to original source...
    46. PRIEST, M. W., WILLIAMS, D. J. and BRIDGEMAN, H. A. 2000. Emissions from in-use lawn-mowers in Australia. Atmospheric Environment, 34(4): 657-664. Go to original source...
    47. PROŃCZUK, M. and PROŃCZUK, S. 2008. Search of Kentucky bluegrass [Poa pratensis] cultivars and ecotypes for low maintenance turf. Biul. IHAR, 248: 147-159. Go to original source...
    48. PROŃCZUK, S. and PROŃCZUK, M. 2006. Search of grass species and cultivars for ecological lawns. Zesz. Nauk. UP we Wrocławiu, Rolnictwo LXXXVIII, 545: 241-248.
    49. RAGONESE, A. and MARX, J. 2015. The applications of sensor technology in the design of the autonomous robotic lawn mower. Paper No. 5094. In: 15th Annu. Freshman Eng. Conf. 11 Apr. 2015, Pittsburgh, PA.
    50. RAPID TECHNIC AG. 2014. Rapid Euro: Operating instructions - TYPE 330, 430 [in Czech: Rapid Euro: Návod k obsluze - TYP 330, 430]. Killwangen: Rapid Technic AG.
    51. RUPRECHT, E., ENYEDI, M. Z., ECKSTEIN, R. L. et al. 2010. Restorative removal of plant litter and vegetation 40 years after abandonment enhances re-emergence of steppe grassland vegetation. Biol Conserv, 143(2): 449-456. Go to original source...
    52. SCAG POWER EQUIPMENT. 2021. About the brand SCAG. AGROCAR S.R.O. [in Czech: O značce SCAG. AGROCAR S.R.O.]. SCAG Power Equipment. [Online]. Available at: http://www.scag.cz/scag/scag-znacka.asp [Accessed: 2021, June 6].
    53. SCAG POWER EQUIPMENT. 2021. Large area mower Turf Tiger. AGROCAR S.R.O. [in Czech: Velkoplošná sekačka Turf Tiger. AGROCAR S.R.O.]. SCAG Power Equipment. [Online]. Available at: http://www.scag.cz/scag/stroj.asp?idstroj=50 [Accessed: 2021, June 6].
    54. SCAG POWER EQUIPMENT. 2010. Operators manual SCAG Wildcat STWC52V-26KA-LC. SCAG.
    55. SCAG POWER EQUIPMENT. 2008b Operators manual Turf Tiger Diesel Powered:Models: STT-28CAT, STT61V-25KBD [03249]. SCAG.
    56. SCAG POWER EQUIPMENT. 2008a. Operators manual Turf Tiger: Models: STT52V-27CH, STT61V-27CH, STT61V-27KA, STT61V-29DFI-SS, STT61V-35BVAC-SS, STT-29DFI-SS, STT-35BVAC-SS. [03248 Rev.2]. SCAG.
    57. SHIMODA, S. 2017. Plant-derived carbon and nitrogen addition due to mowing in the early stages of post-agricultural succession. Ecol Eng, 98: 24-31. Go to original source...
    58. SRIVASTAVA, A. K., GOERING, C. E. and ROHRBACH, R. P. et al. 2006. Engineering principles of agricultural machines. St. Joseph: American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
    59. SVENSSON, R., PHILGREN, A. and WISSMAN, J. 2009. The grass trimmer: better than its reputation [in Swedish: Gräsröjaren: bättre än sitt rykte!]. Sven Bot Tidskr, 103: 187-195.
    60. TÄLLE, M., BERGMAN, K-O., PALTTO, H. et al. 2014. Mowing for biodiversity: grass trimmer and knife mower perform equally well. Biodiver. Conserv., 23: 3073-3089. Go to original source...
    61. TIP SPOL. S.R.O. 2012. ROBOT: Uniaxial universal small tractor - Instructions for use and operation [in Czech: ROBOT: Jednoosý univerzální malotraktor - Návod k použití a obsluze]. Prostějov: TIP spol. s.r.o.
    62. TIP SPOL. S.R.O. 2021. Uniaxial Garden Tractors ROBOT [in Czech: Jednoosé Malotraktory ROBOT]. TIP. [Online]. Available at: http://tip-pv.cz/jednoose-malotraktory-robot.php [Accessed: 2021, June 6].
    63. TURGEON, A. 1991. Turfgrass management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    64. VALLIERE, J. M. et al. 2019. Repeated mowing to restore remnant native grasslands invaded by nonnative annual grasses: Upsides and downsides above and below ground. Restoration Ecology, 27(2): 261-268. Go to original source...
    65. WAHLMAN, H. and MILBERG, P. 2002. Management of semi-natural grassland vegetation: evaluation of a long-term experiment in southern Sweden. Ann. Bot. Fennici, 39: 159-166.
    66. WILSON, C. R. and KOSKI, T. 1998. Eliminate grass clipping collection. PhD Thesis. Colorado State University.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content