Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2021, 69(2), 211-220 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun.2021.018

Marketing Dialogue With Pressure Groups

Jiří Boháček1, Zdeněk Linhart1, Peter Matisko1, Miroslav ©paček2
1 Department of Marketing, University of Economics and Management, Nároľní 2600/9A, 158 00 Praha 5, Czech Republic
2 Department of Management, University of Economics and Management, Nároľní 2600/9A, 158 00 Praha 5, Czech Republic

CSR actions are often controversial due to either the excessive voluntary or narrow standardized approach. The objective of this article is to find indices, which homogenize CSR campaigns of corporations according to specific attitudes and behaviour of individuals. Cluster analysis has significantly differentiated CSR volunteering contributors from non-volunteering critics. A small cluster of non-volunteering respondents calls for support of kids, criminals and addicts. Volunteering clusters are composed of employed respondents who are predominantly calling for equality and environment according to their work and leisure interest. The technology volunteering from the previous year disappeared from the list of CSR of respondents as it was aggregated either to other priority or finished and forgotten due to interests in a new project. Results demonstrate that responsibility is not related only to people in need but calls for simplification of complex public, corporate and human relationships to focus on its development.

Keywords: volunteering and non-volunteering contributors, CSR campaigns homogenization indices, social equality

Received: April 15, 2020; Revised: February 3, 2021; Accepted: February 26, 2021; Published: May 1, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Boháček, J., Linhart, Z., Matisko, P., & ©paček, M. (2021). Marketing Dialogue With Pressure Groups. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis69(2), 211-220. doi: 10.11118/actaun.2021.018
Download citation

References

  1. ADAMS, R., JEANRENAUD, S., BESSANT, J., DENYER, D. and OVERY, P. 2016. Sustainability-oriented innovation: a systematic review. Int. J. Manag. Rev., 18(2): 180-205. Go to original source...
  2. ANDIOLA, L. M. and BEDARD, J. C. 2018. Delivering the "tough message": Moderators of subordinate auditors' reactions to feedback. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 70: 52-68. Go to original source...
  3. BASS, F. 1969. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 15(5): 215-227. Go to original source...
  4. BLOOM, T. 2015. The Business of Migration Control: Delegating Migration Control Functions to Private Actors. Global policy, 6(2): 151-157. Go to original source...
  5. BRAMMER, S. J. and PAVELIN, S. 2006. Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3): 435-455. Go to original source...
  6. BRUNNER, C. B. and BAUM, M. 2020. The impact of brand portfolios on organizational attractiveness. Journal of Business Research, 106: 182-195. Go to original source...
  7. HERSHER, R. 2017. Starbucks says it will hire 10,000 refugees worldwide in the next 5 years. National Public Radio. [Online]. Available at: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/01/30/512427887/starbucks-says-it-will-hire-10-000-refugees-worldwide-in-next-5-years [Accessed: 2017, September 1].
  8. IGARI, R. and HOSHINO, T. A. 2018. Bayesian data combination approach for repeated durations under unobserved missing indicators: Application to interpurchase-timing in marketing. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 126: 150-166. Go to original source...
  9. IKRAM, A., LI, Z. F. and MINOR, D. 2019. CSR-contingent executive compensation contracts. Journal of Banking & Finance, in press. Go to original source...
  10. JAHN, J. and BRÜHL, R. 2019. Can bad news be good? On the positive and negative effects of including moderately negative information in CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Research, 97: 117-128. Go to original source...
  11. JAY, J. and GERAND, M. 2015. Accelerating the Theory and Practice of Sustainability-oriented Innovation. MIT Sloan School Working paper. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Go to original source...
  12. JOHNSON, J. S., MATTHES, J. M. and FRIEND, S. B. 2019. Interfacing and customer-facing: Sales and marketing selling centers. Industrial Marketing Management, 77: 41-56. Go to original source...
  13. KROESEN, M. and CHOROUS, C. 2018. The role of general and specific attitudes in predicting travel behavior - A fatal dilemma? Travel Behaviour and Society, 10: 33-41. Go to original source...
  14. KRUGER, J. and DUNNING, D. 1999. Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6): 1121-1134. Go to original source...
  15. LIU, M., LAM, J., ZHU, B. and KWOK, K-W. 2019. On positive realness, negative imaginariness, and H∞ control of state-space symmetric systems. Automatica, 101: 190-196. Go to original source...
  16. LUTZ, R. J., MACKENZIE, S. B. and BELCH, G. E. 1983. Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: Determinants and consequences. Advances in Consumer Research, 10: 532-539.
  17. MACKENZIE, S. B., LUTZ. R. J. and BELCH, G. E. 1986. The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2): 130-143. Go to original source...
  18. MITCHELL, A. A. and OLSON, J. C. 1981. Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitudes? Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 318-322. Go to original source...
  19. MÖLK, A. 2018. Structures, strategizing, and contested territories: A structuration perspective on strategy development in employer branding. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(4): 326-334. Go to original source...
  20. OEIJ, P. R. A., van der TORRE, W., VAAS, F. and DHONDT, S. 2019. Understanding social innovation as an innovation process: Applying the innovation journey model. Journal of Business Research, 101(8): 243-254. Go to original source...
  21. PETERSON, D. K. 2004. The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business and Society, 43(3): 296-319. Go to original source...
  22. RAWSON, A., DUNCAN, E. and JONES, C. 2013. The Truth about Customer Experience. Harvard Business Review, 91: 1-10.
  23. ROGERS, E. M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. London: The Free Press.
  24. ROSLING, H., Rosling, O. and Rosling Rönnlund, A. 2018. Factfulness: Ten Reasons We're Wrong About the World - and Why Things Are Better Than You Think. Sceptre.
  25. SARIDAKIS, C., ANGELIDOU, S. and WOODSIDE, A. G. 2020. What type of CSR engagement suits my firm best? Evidence from an abductively-derived typology. Journal of Business Research, 108: 174-187. Go to original source...
  26. SHIMP, T. A. 1981. Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice. Journal of Advertising, 10(2): 9-15. Go to original source...
  27. TUNER, M. R., MCINTOSH, T., REID, S. W. and BUCKLEY, M. R. 2019. Corporate implementation of socially controversial CSR initiatives: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 29(1): 125-136. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.