Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2020, 68(1), 263-274 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun202068010263

Traditional and Alternative Business Cycle Dating Procedures: Evidence for the Euro Area and the Czech Economy

Ľubica Štiblárová
Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovak Republic

This paper examines to which extent the results of multivariate principal component analysis based on a set of macroeconomic indicators used by one of the leading economic research organizations - the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), mimics traditional, univariate Bry and Boschan (1971) business cycle procedure. Using almost 20 years of observations, we estimate the euro area aggregate and the Czech business cycles by classical, as well as alternative multivariate method. Comparison of the euro area aggregate classical business cycle with that of the CEPR reveals minor discrepancies. The estimation of the Czech business cycle using principal component analysis suffers from volatile time series, potentially resulting from a smaller character of the economy. On the contrary, the estimate of the euro area aggregate business cycle reflects quite well Bry and Boschan (1971) procedure, showing rather lagging behavior.

Keywords: business cycle, Bry and Boschan procedure, Centre for Economic Policy Research, principal component analysis, euro area aggregate, Czechia

Received: July 14, 2019; Accepted: December 3, 2019; Published: February 27, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Štiblárová, Ľ. (2020). Traditional and Alternative Business Cycle Dating Procedures: Evidence for the Euro Area and the Czech Economy. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis68(1), 263-274. doi: 10.11118/actaun202068010263
Download citation

References

  1. ANDRLE, M., BRŮHA, J. and SOLMAZ, S. 2016. Output and Inflation Co-Movement: An Update on Business-Cycle Stylized Facts. IMF Working Paper WP/16/241. IMF. Go to original source...
  2. ANDRLE, M., BRŮHA, J. and SOLMAZ, S. 2017. On the Sources of Business Cycles: Implications for DSGE Models. ECB Working Paper Series No. 2058. EBC.
  3. ARTIS, M. J., KONTOLEMIS, Z. and OSBORN, D. 1997. Business Cycles for G7 and European Countries. The Journal of Business, 70(2): 249-279. DOI: 10.1086/209717 Go to original source...
  4. ARTIS, M. J., MARCELLINO, M. and PROIETTI, T. 2004. Characterising the Business Cycle for Accession Countries. CEPR, Technical Report. CEPR. Go to original source...
  5. AYSUN, U. and YAGIHASHI, T. 2019. The Common Sources of Business Cycles in Trans-Pacific Countries and the US? A Comparison with NAFTA. The World Economy, 42(4): 1077-1109. DOI: 10.1111/twec.12742 Go to original source...
  6. BARTLETT, M. S. 1951. The Effect of Standardization on a Chi Square Approximation in Factor Analysis. Biometrika, 38: 337-344. Go to original source...
  7. BOVI, M. 2005. Economic Clubs and European Commitments. Evidence from the International Business Cycles. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 2(2): 101-122.
  8. BRY, G. and BOSCHAN, C. 1971. Cyclical Analysis of Time Series: Selected Procedures and Computer Programs. Columbia University Press.
  9. BURNS, A. F. and MITCHELL, W. C. 1946. Measuring Business Cycles. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  10. CANOVA, F. 1998. Detrending and Business Cycles Facts. Journal of Monetary Economics, 41(3): 475-512. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3932(98)00006-3 Go to original source...
  11. CEPR. 2012. Methodological Note. CEPR Euro Area Business Cycle Dating Committee.
  12. CEPR. 2015. Euro Area Out of Recession, in Unusually Weak Expansion. CEPR Euro Area Business Cycle Dating Committee.
  13. CEPR. 2017. Data Sources. CEPR. [Online]. Available at: https://cepr.org/content/data-sources-1 [Accessed: 2018, January 14].
  14. DARVAS, Z. and SZAPÁRY, G. 2008. Business Cycle Synchronization in the Enlarged EU. Open Economies Review, 19(1): 1-19. DOI: 10.1007/s11079-007-9027-7 Go to original source...
  15. EUROSTAT. 2019. Database. Eurostat. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database [Accessed: 2019, July 12].
  16. FRANKEL, J. A. and ROSE, A. K. 1998. The Endogenity of the Optimum Currency Area Criteria. The Economic Journal, 108(449): 1009-1025. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0297.00327 Go to original source...
  17. FRIEDMAN, M. 1968. The Role of Monetary Policy. The American Economic Review, 58(1): 1-17.
  18. FRIEDMAN, M. and SCHWARTZ, A. J. 1963. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960. Princeton University Press.
  19. GRIGORAŞ, V. and STANCIU, I. E. 2016. New Evidence on the (De)Synchronisation of Business Cycles: Reshaping the European Business Cycle. International Economics, 147: 27-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.inteco.2016.03.002 Go to original source...
  20. HARDING, D. and PAGAN, A. 2002. Dissecting the Cycle: A Methodological Investigation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(2): 365-381. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3932(01)00108-8 Go to original source...
  21. KAISER, H. F. 1958. The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 23: 187-200. DOI: 10.1007/BF02289233 Go to original source...
  22. KEYNES, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
  23. KLOUDOVÁ, D. 2013. Output Gap as Indicator of Inflation - Case for Czech Economy [in Czech: Produkční Mezera jako Indikátor Inflace - Případ pro Českou Ekonomiku]. Politická Ekonomie, 61(5): 639-652. DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.921 Go to original source...
  24. KYDLAND, F. E. and PRESCOTT, E. C. 1982. Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations. Econometrica, 50(6): 1345-1370. DOI: 10.2307/1913386 Go to original source...
  25. KYDLAND, F. E. and PRESCOTT, E. C. 1990. Business Cycles: Real Facts and Monetary Myth. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 14(2): 3-18. Go to original source...
  26. MUNDELL, R. 1961. The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. American Economic Review, 51(4): 657-665.
  27. NBER. 2010. Business Cycle Dating Committee, National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER. [Online]. Available at: http://www.nber.org/cycles/sept2010.html [Accessed: 2018, January 20].
  28. NBER. 2012. US Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions. NBER. [Online]. Available at: http://www.nber.org/cycles/US_Business_Cycle_Expansions_and_Contractions_20120423.pdf [Accessed: 2018, January 20].
  29. OECD. 2018. OECD Quarterly National Accounts Database. OCED.Stat. [Online]. Available at: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=QNA [Accessed: 2018, January 04].
  30. OECD. 2019. OECD Production and Sales Database. OCED.Stat. [Online]. Available at: http://stats.oecd.org/viewhtml.aspx?datasetcode=MEI_REAL〈=en [Accessed: 2019, July 12].
  31. ÓDOR, Ľ. and JURAŠEKOVÁ KUCSEROVÁ, J. 2014. Finding Yeti. More Robust Estimates of Output Gap in Slovakia. Working Paper No. 2/2014. Council for Budget Responsibility.
  32. PYBUS, T. 2011. Estimating the UK's Historical Output Gap. Working Paper No. 1. Office for Budget Responsibility.
  33. R CORE TEAM. 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/ [Accessed: 2019, July 12].
  34. RENCHER, A. C. 1995. Methods of Multivariate Analysis. New York: Wiley.
  35. RENCHER, A. C. 1998. Multivariate Statistical Inference and Applications. New York: Wiley.
  36. SCHUMPETER, J. 1939. Business Cycles. A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York Toronto London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  37. STOCK, J. H. and WATSON, M. W. 1999. Business Cycle Fluctuations in US Macroeconomic Time Series. In: TAYLOR, J. B. and WOODFORD, M. (Eds.). Handbook of Macroeconomics. Elsevier, pp. 3-64. Go to original source...
  38. WORLD BANK. 2018. World Development Indicators Database. World Bank. [Online]. Available at: http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators [Accessed: 2018, January 07].

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.