Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2020, 68(1), 211-218 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun202068010211

The Relationship Between Board of Directors and Sustainability Reporting: An Empirical Study in German Large Listed Firms

Thi Thuc Doan Nguyen
Faculty of Management and Economics, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, nám. T. G. Masaryka 5555, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic

To improve quality of sustainability reporting, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines have been issued and widely applied. Board of directors' characteristics can be seen as essential factors to facilitate the implementation of these practices. This paper aims to investigate the relationship between board of directors and GRI adherence in sustainability disclosures. The research uses Tobit regression for 388 observations from 97 German listed firms in the period from 2013 to 2016. The findings indicate significant negative relation between board size and GRI adherent level of sustainability reporting. Further analysis is implemented for environmentally friendly and sensitive industries. The results maintain the same for board size, and reveal positive impact of board committees on GRI adherence of sustainability reporting in sensitive industry.

Keywords: GRI adherent level, board of directors, sustainability reporting

Received: March 7, 2019; Accepted: November 20, 2019; Published: February 27, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nguyen, T.T.D. (2020). The Relationship Between Board of Directors and Sustainability Reporting: An Empirical Study in German Large Listed Firms. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 68(1), 211-218. doi: 10.11118/actaun202068010211
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ABDULLAH, S. N. 2004. Board Composition, CEO Duality and Performance among Malaysian Listed Companies. Corporate Governance, 4(4): 47-61. DOI: 10.1108/14720700410558871 Go to original source...
    2. ADAMS, R. B. and FERREIRA, D. 2009. Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance. Journal of Finance and Economics, 94: 291-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007 Go to original source...
    3. AKTAS, R., KAYALIDERE, K. and KARGIN, M. 2013. Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Analysis of Sustainability Reports in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(3): 113. DOI: 10.5539/ijef.v5n3p113 Go to original source...
    4. AL-NAJJAR, B. 2014. Corporate Governance, Tourism Growth and Firm Performance: Evidence from Publicly Listed Tourism Firms in Five Middle Eastern Countries. Tourism Management, 42: 342-351. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.09.008 Go to original source...
    5. CAMPBELL, D. 2003. Intra- and Inter-Sectoral Effects in Environmental Disclosures: Evidence for Legitimacy Theory? Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(6): 357-371. DOI: 10.1002/bse.375 Go to original source...
    6. CHEN, M. H. 2007. Hotel Stock Performance and Monetary Conditions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 26(3): 588-602. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2006.05.003 Go to original source...
    7. COAD, A., SEGARRA, A. and TERUEL, M. 2013 Like Milk or Wine: Does Firm Performance Improve with Age?. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24: 173-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2012.07.002 Go to original source...
    8. CORMIER, D. and GORDON, I. M. 2001. An Examination of Social and Environmental Reporting Strategies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(5): 587-617. DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000006264 Go to original source...
    9. DALTON, D. R., DAILY, C. M., JOHNSON, J. L. and ELLSTRAND, A. E. 1999. Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(6): 674-686. Go to original source...
    10. FRIAS-ACEITUNO, J., RODRIGUEZ-ARIZA, L. and GARCIA-SANCHEZ, I. M. 2012. The Role of the Board in the Dissemination of Integrated Corporate Social Reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 20(4): 219-233. DOI: 10.1002/csr.1294 Go to original source...
    11. FUENTE, J. A., GACIA-SANCHEZ, I. M. and LOZANO, M. B. 2017. The Role of The Board of Directors in the Adoption of GRI Guidelines for The Disclosure of CSR Information. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141: 737-750. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.155 Go to original source...
    12. GERMAN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CODE. 2015. Deutscher Corporate Governance Kodex. [Online]. Available at: https://www.dcgk.de/en/code/archive.html [Accessed: 2017, June 17].
    13. GUEST, P. M. 2008. The Determinants of Board Size and Composition: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(1): 51-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.01.002 Go to original source...
    14. GURCHARAN, S. 2010. A Review of Optimal Capital Structure Determinant of Selected Asean Countries. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 47: 32-43.
    15. HACKSTON, D. and MILNE, M. J. 1996. Some Determinants of Social and Environmental Disclosures in New Zealand Companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(1): 77-108. DOI: 10.1108/09513579610109987 Go to original source...
    16. HANIFFA, R. M. and COOKE, T. E. 2005. The Impact of Culture and Governance on Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5): 391-430. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001 Go to original source...
    17. HASAN, A. and BUTT, S.A. 2009. Impact of Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance on Capital Structure of Pakistani Listed Companies. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(2): 50-58. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v4n2p50 Go to original source...
    18. HUSE, M. and SOLBERG, A. G. 2006. Gender-related Boardroom Dynamics. How Scandinavian Women Make and Can Make Contributions on Corporate Boards. Women in Management Review, 21(2): 113-130. DOI: 10.1108/09649420610650693 Go to original source...
    19. JENKINS, H. 2006. Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3): 241-256. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9182-6 Go to original source...
    20. JENSEN, M. C. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and The Failure of Internal Control Systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3): 831-880. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x Go to original source...
    21. JUNIOR, R. M., BEST, P. J. and COTTER, J. 2014. Sustainability Reporting and Assurance: a Historical Analysis on a World-Wide Phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1637-y Go to original source...
    22. KANAGARETNAM, K., LOBO, G. J. and WHALEN, D. J. 2007. Does Good Corporate Governance Reduce Information Asymmetry Around Quarterly Earnings Announcements? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(4): 497-522. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2007.05.003 Go to original source...
    23. KARAMANOU, I. and VAFEAS, N. 2005. The association between corporate boards, audit committees, and management earnings forecasts: an empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(3): 453-486. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2005.00177.x Go to original source...
    24. KASSINIS, G. and VAFEAS, N. 2002. Corporate Boards and Outside Stakeholders as Determinants of Environmental Litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5): 399-415. DOI: 10.1002/smj.230 Go to original source...
    25. KOLK, A. 2008. Sustainability, Accountability and Corporate Governance: Exploring Multinationals' Reporting Practices. Business strategy and the environment, 17(1): 1-15. DOI: 10.1002/bse.511 Go to original source...
    26. KPMG. 2017. Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2017. [Online] Available at: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2017/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf [Accessed: 2018, May 12].
    27. LAKSMANA, I. 2008. Corporate Board Governance and Voluntary Disclosure of Executive Compensation Practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4): 1147-1182. DOI: 10.1506/car.25.4.8 Go to original source...
    28. LIAO, L., LUO, L. and TANG, Q. 2015. Gender Diversity, Board Independence, Environmental Committee and Greenhouse Gas Disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4): 409-424. DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002 Go to original source...
    29. MAJEED, S., AZIZ, T. and SALEEM, S. 2015. The Effect of Corporate Governance Elements on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: An Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies at KSE Pakistan. International Journal of Financial Studies, 3(4): 530-556. DOI: 10.3390/ijfs3040530 Go to original source...
    30. PRADO-LORENZO, J. M. and GARCIA-SANCHEZ, I. M. 2010. The Role of the Board of Directors in Disseminating Relevant Information on Greenhouse Gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3): 391-424. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0515-0 Go to original source...
    31. ROBERTS, R. W. 1992. Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6): 595-612. DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K Go to original source...
    32. SIMNETT, R., VANSTRAELEN, A. and CHUA, W. F. 2009. Assurance on Sustainability Reports: An International Comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3): 937-967. DOI: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937 Go to original source...
    33. SMITH, N., SMITH, V. and VERNER, M. 2006. Do Women in Top Management Affect Firm Performance? A Panel Study of 2500 Danish Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7): 569-593. DOI: 10.1108/17410400610702160 Go to original source...
    34. SVENSSON, G., WOOD, G., SINGH, J. and CALLAGHAN, M. 2009. Implementation, Communication and Benefits of Corporate Codes of Ethics: an International and Longitudinal Approach for Australia, Canada and Sweden. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(4): 389-407. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2009.01571.x Go to original source...
    35. TAGESSON, T., BLANK, V., BROBERG, P. and COLLIN, S. O. 2009. What Explains the Extent and Content of Social and Environmental Disclosures on Corporate Websites: A Study of Social and Environmental Reporting in Swedish Listed Corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(6): 352-364. DOI: 10.1002/csr.194 Go to original source...
    36. TEOH, H. Y. and THONG, G. 1984. Another Look at Corporate Social Responsibility and Reporting: An Empirical Study in a Developing Country. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9(2): 189-206. DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(84)90007-2 Go to original source...
    37. WEBB, E. 2004. An Examination of Socially Responsible Firms' Board Structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(3): 255-277. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-004-1107-0 Go to original source...
    38. WELFORD, R. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia: 2004 Survey Results. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17: 33-52. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content