Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67(6), 1525-1533 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967061525

Factors of Employee Engagement at the Workplace. Do Years of Service Count?

Roxana Hinzmann1, Martina Rašticová2, Jakub Šácha3
1 Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Law and Social Sciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
3 Department of Statistics and Operation Analysis, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

This article deals with employee engagement in SMEs when the employee's years of service are taken into consideration. The aim of the paper is to show if seniority influences engagement and if there are further factors that have major impact on employee engagement. To fulfill the aim quantitative methodology was applied. It is based on the analysis of data that derives from an engagement survey that was conducted in 2017 with 70 SMEs globally that belong to the mechanical engineering industry. The sample consists of 5,078 employees that participated in the engagement survey. The survey was standardized based on the engagement model from Aon Hewitt and consisted of 74 questions. The organizational structure of the different legal entities is similar due to the common industry and types of employees who are mainly Service and Sales representatives. This also leads to a similar HR strategy and allows to compare the results. The data from the engagement survey was analyzed with IBM SPSS software that provided the regression analysis. The results indicate that the construct of employee engagement is complex and there is not only one influencing variable. However, seniority does have an impact. The engagement of recently hired employees is around 27% higher than for employees with higher seniority. Additionally, employees with a high seniority show less interest when it comes to rewards and recognition.

Keywords: employee engagement, generations at the workplace, human resources

Received: June 3, 2019; Accepted: November 5, 2019; Published: December 22, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hinzmann, R., Rašticová, M., & Šácha, J. (2019). Factors of Employee Engagement at the Workplace. Do Years of Service Count? Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(6), 1525-1533. doi: 10.11118/actaun201967061525
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ALBRECHT, S. L., BAKKER, A. B., GRUMAN, J. A., MACEY, W. H. and SAKS, A. M. 2015. Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: an integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1): 7-35. DOI: 10.1108/JOEPP-08-2014-0042 Go to original source...
    2. AON HEWITT. 2015. Aon Hewitt's Model of Employee Engagement. Available at: http://www.aon.com/human-capital-consulting/thought-leadership/talent/aon-hewitt-model-of-employee-engagement.jsp [Accessed: 07.03.2019].
    3. BARNES-FARELL, J. L. and MATTHEWS, R. A. 2007. Age and Work Attitudes. In: SCHULTZ, K. S. and ADAMS, G. A. (Eds.). Aging and Work in the 21st Century. Mahwah, pp. 139-162.
    4. BIELING, G. 2011. Age Inclusion: Success effects of dealing with employees of different age groups in companies [in German: Age Inclusion: Erfolgsauswirkungen des Umgangs mit Mitarbeitern unterschiedlicher Altersgruppen in Unternehmen]. In: STOCK-HOMBURG, R. and WIESEKE, J. (Eds.). New perspectives of market-oriented corporate governance [in German: Neue Perspektiven der marktorientierten Unternehmensführung]. Wiesbaden.
    5. DAHLMANNS, A. 2014. Generation Y und Personalmanagemen [in German: Generation Y und Personalmanagement]. In: BRÖCKERMANN, R. (Ed.). Practice-oriented personnel and organizational research [in German: Praxisorientierte Personal- und Organisationsforschung], München: Band 18, pp. 12-16.
    6. DELOITTE. 2009. Generation Y: powerhouse of the global economy Restless generation is a challenge-and a huge opportunity-for employers. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/human-capital/us-consulting-hc-generationy-snapshot-041509.pdf [Accessed: 2019, February 2].
    7. FERGUSON, A. 2005. Employee engagement: does it exist, and if so how does it relate to performance, other constructs and individual differences? In: Annual Industrial/ Organisational Psychology Conference. Australian Psychological Society, 1-3 July 2005, at Australia. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301753514_'Employee_engagement'_does_it_exist_and_if_so_how_does_it_relate_to_performance_other_constructs_and_individual_differences [Accessed: 2019, April 19].
    8. HESS, T. M. 2006. Attitudes toward Aging and Their Effects on Behavior. In: BIRREN, J. E. and SCHAIE, K. W. (Eds.). Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. San Diego, pp. 379-406. Go to original source...
    9. HITKA, M. and BALÁŽOVÁ, Ž. 2015. The impact of age, education and seniority on motivation of employees. Business: Theory and Practice, 16(1): 113-120. Go to original source...
    10. EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING. 2016. How firms can attract top talent: The growing influence of non-financial rewards. Human Resource Management International Digest, 24(1): 24-26. Go to original source...
    11. KAHN, W. 1990. Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 692-724. Go to original source...
    12. KIENBAUM. 2012. Faster, higher, further: HRM in volatile markets: HR Trend Study 2012 [in German: Schneller, höher, weiter: HRM in volatilen Märkten: HR Trendstudie 2012]. Available at: http://www.reif.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Ergebnisbericht_HR-Trendstudie2012_final.pdf [Accessed: 2019, May 5].
    13. KIENBAUM. 2015. Graduates under the microscope in 2015: Goals, Values and Career Orientation of Generation Y [in German: Absolventen 2015 unter die Lupe genommen: Ziele, Wertvorstellungen und Karriereorientierung der Generation Y]. Keinbaum Institut. Available at: http://www.kienbauminstitut-ism.de/fileadmin/user_data/veroeffentlichungen/kienbaum_institut_ism_studie_absolventen_08_2015.pdf [Accessed: 21.03.2019].
    14. KLAFFKE, M. 2014. Success factor Generation Management - approaches for personnel management [in German: Erfolgsfaktor Generationen-Management - Handlungsansätze für das Personalmanagement]. In: KLAFFKE, M. (Ed.). Generationen-Management, Konzepte, Instrumente, Good-Practice-Ansätze. Wiesbaden, p. 3-25. Go to original source...
    15. MANGELSDORF, M. 2014. 30 Minuten Generation Y. Gabal.
    16. MANNHEIM, K. 1952(1927). The problem of generations. In: KECSKEMETI, P. (Ed.). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. Oxford, pp. 276-320.
    17. PARMENT, A. 2009. Generation Y - Employees of the future. Challenge and success factor for personnel management [in German: Die Generation Y - Mitarbeiter der Zukunft. Herausforderung und Erfolgsfaktor für das Personalmanagement]. Wiesbaden.
    18. PWC. 2011. Millenials at work: Reshaping the workforce. PWC. Available at: https://www.pwc.de/de/prozessoptimierung/assets/millennials-at-work-2011.pdf [Accessed: 2019, February 17].
    19. RUTHUS, J. 2014. Employer attractiveness from the point of view of Generation Y - Recommendations for action for Human Resources Management [in German: Arbeitgeberattraktivität aus Sicht der Generation Y - Handlungsempfehlungen für das Human Resources Management]. Wiesbaden.
    20. SCHAUFELI, W. B., SALANOVA, M., GONZALEZ-ROMA, V. and BAKKER, A. B. 2002. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1): 71-92. DOI: 10.1023/A:1015630930326 Go to original source...
    21. SCHWUCHOW, K. and GUTMANN, J. 2015. Personnel development: topics, trends, best practices [in German: Personalentwicklung: Themen, Trends, Best Practices]. Freiburg: Haufe
    22. SHARMA, S. K. and KAUR, S. 2014. An Introspection of Employee Engagement: A Quantitative Content Analysis Approach. The IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(2): 38-57.
    23. SONNENTAG, S. and FRESE, M. 2002. Performance Concepts and Performance Theory. In: SONNENTAG, S. (Ed.). Psychological Management of Individual Performance. Chichester, pp. 4-19. Go to original source...
    24. ZEMKE, R., RAINES, C. and FILIPCZAK, B. 2013. Generations at Work: Managing the Clash of Boomers, Gen Xers, and Gen Yers in the Workplace. 2nd Edition. New York.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content