Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67(4), 1039-1048 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967041039

Curbing Corruption in the Public Sector by Utilizing Electronic Public Administration

Veronika Linhartová
Department of Economic Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Administration, University of Pardubice, Studentská 84, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic

Corruption is a highly debated issue that harms both the governments of individual countries as well as citizens themselves. Corruption in the public sector can lead to an increase in public spending and a reduction in the amount of taxes levied, thus increasing fiscal deficits and creating macroeconomic instability. Utilizing electronic administration within the public sector has recently been given much attention a key tool for fighting corruption in public administration. E-administration not only makes it possible to provide more information to the population more simply, efficiently, and quickly, but it also helps to eliminate discretion on the part of officials, i.e., the officials' power to make decisions based on their personal assessment of a situation. This paper focuses on the relationship between a country's corruption level and the degree of e-government being used in the country. Using graphical interpretation of statistical data and regression analysis, it was found that utilizing e-government within public administration has a positive effect on a country's corruption level. However, economic performance demonstrated the greatest influence on the corruption level for the given period and group of countries.

Keywords: corruption, corruption perception index, e-government, e-government development index, public administration

Received: January 29, 2019; Accepted: July 29, 2019; Published: August 26, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Linhartová, V. (2019). Curbing Corruption in the Public Sector by Utilizing Electronic Public Administration. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis67(4), 1039-1048. doi: 10.11118/actaun201967041039
Download citation

References

  1. ANDERSEN, T. B. 2009. E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21(3): 201-210. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003 Go to original source...
  2. ANDERSEN, T. B. and RAND, J. 2006. Does E-Government Reduce Corruption? Working Paper. University of Copenhagen, Department of Economics. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2854/ab54b65a26236ab0e7752bdd89794eaf3ed6.pdf [Accessed: 2019, July 15].
  3. BALTAGI, B. H. 2013. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 5th Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Go to original source...
  4. BHATNAGAR, S. 2003. Transparency and Corruption: Does E-Government Help? Draft paper for the compilation of CHRI 2003 Report OPEN SESAME: looking for the Right to Information in the Commonwealth. Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative. Available at: https://faculty.iima.ac.in/~subhash/pdfs/CHRIDraftPaper2003.pdf [Accessed: 2019, July 15].
  5. DZHUMASHEV, R. 2014. Corruption and growth: The role of governance, public spending, and economic development, Economic Modelling, 37: 202-215. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.11.007 Go to original source...
  6. ELBAHNASAWY, N. G. 2014. E-Government, Internet Adoption, and Corruption: An Empirical Investigation. World Development, 1(57): 114-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.12.005 Go to original source...
  7. HALÁSKOVÁ, M. and HALÁSKOVÁ, R. 2018. Evaluation Structure of Local Public Expenditures in the European Union Countries. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(3): 755-766. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866030755 Go to original source...
  8. HUNTINGTON, S. P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societes. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  9. JAIN, A. K. 2001. Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1): 71-121. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6419.00133 Go to original source...
  10. ΚATSIOS, S. 2015. The shadow economy and corruption in Greece. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 4(1): 61-80.
  11. KIM, C. 2007. A cross-national analysis of global E-government, Public Organization Review, 7(10): 317-329. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-007-0040-5 Go to original source...
  12. KIMBRO, M. 2002. A cross-country empirical investigation of corruption and its relationship to economic, cultural, and monitoring institutions: an examination of the role of accounting and financial statements quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 17(4): 325-349. DOI: 10.1177/0148558X0201700403 Go to original source...
  13. LEFF, N. H. 1989. Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption. New Brunswick: Transaction Publisher.
  14. MISTRY, J. J. and JALAL, A. 2012. An empirical analysis of relationship between e-government and corruption. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 12: 145-176. DOI: 10.4192/1577-8517-v12_6 Go to original source...
  15. PATHAK, R. D., SINGH, G., BELWAL, R. and SMITH, R. F. I. 2007. E-governance and Corruption-developments and Issues in Ethiopia. Public Organization Review, 7(3): 195-208. DOI: 10.1007/s11115-007-0031-6 Go to original source...
  16. ROSE-ACKERMAN, S. 1997. The political economy of corruption. Corruption and the global economy series, Vol. 31. Institute for International Economics.
  17. ROSE-ACKERMAN, S. 2013. Corruption: A Study in Political Economy. Academic Press.
  18. SHIM, D. C. and EOM, T. H. 2008. E-Government and Anti-Corruption: Empirical Analysis of International Data. Intl. Journal of Public Administration, 31(3): 298-316. DOI: 10.1080/01900690701590553 Go to original source...
  19. TANZI, V. 1998. Corruption around the world: causes, consequences, scope and cures. Working Paper 98/63. International Monetary Fund. Go to original source...
  20. UNITED NATIONS. 2016. E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development. UN E-Government Survey 2016. Available at: http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN96407.pdf [Accessed: 2019, July 15].
  21. VISHNY, R. W. and SHLEIFER, A. 1993. Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 599-617. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.