Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67(2), 565-581 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967020565

Reasons of Unethical Business Practices in Slovakia: The Perspective of Non-Governmental Organizations' Representatives

Anna Remišová, Anna Lašáková, Alexandra Bohinská
Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Comenius University in Bratislava, Šafárikovo nám. 6, 814 99 Bratislava 1, Slovakia

After the fall of communism, the first non-governmental organizations (NGOs) were established in Slovakia in the 1990's. Since then, our NGOs have played an important role in promoting business ethics even though it was originally not part of their primary mission. Given that, we held semi-structured interviews with the leaders of nine prominent Slovak NGOs to identify the perceived causes of unethical practices occurring in the Slovak business environment. The results of this qualitative research suggest that our respondents connect the causes of unethical actions in business mainly with the macro-level of society, that is with the way the State with its institutions and authorities operate. Out of ten identified causes of unethical business practices, our respondents assigned five to the macro-level, while they linked three reasons to the mezzo-level with unethical conduct of companies and two to the micro-level with unethical decisions of individuals. Since the government has taken measures to create a more ethical business environment recently, it is now up to companies to realize they hold the joint responsibility for the state of the Slovak society and to concentrate more on what they can do for their part in favor of the development of business ethics.

Keywords: business ethics, causes of unethical practices, CEE, ethics, NGOs, Slovakia
Grants and funding:

This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-16-0091.

Received: April 13, 2018; Accepted: February 9, 2019; Published: April 29, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Remišová, A., Lašáková, A., & Bohinská, A. (2019). Reasons of Unethical Business Practices in Slovakia: The Perspective of Non-Governmental Organizations' Representatives. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 67(2), 565-581. doi: 10.11118/actaun201967020565
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ARENAS, D., LOZANO, J. M. and ALBAREDA, L. 2009. The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1): 175-197. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0109-x Go to original source...
    2. ARMSTRONG, P. 2010. From bourgeois sociology to managerial apologetics: A tale of existential struggle. In: Armstrong, P. and Lightfoot, G. (Eds.). 'The Leading Journal in the Field': Destabilizing Authority in the Social Sciences of Management. London: May Fly Books, pp. 165-205.
    3. BAUR, D. and PALAZZO, G. 2011. The moral legitimacy of NGOs as partners of corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4): 579-604. DOI: 10.5840/beq201121437 Go to original source...
    4. BAUR, D. and SCHMITZ, H. P. 2012. Corporations and NGOs: When accountability leads to co-optation. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1): 9-21. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-1057-9 Go to original source...
    5. BOND, M. H., KWAN, V. S. Y. and LI, C. 2000. Decomposing a sense of superiority: The differential social impact of self-regard and regard for others. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4): 537-553. DOI: 10.1006/jrpe.2000.2297 Go to original source...
    6. BRYMAN, A. 2008. Social Research Methods. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    7. BUGARIC, B. 2008. Populism, liberal democracy, and the rule of law in Central and Eastern Europe. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 41: 191-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2008.03.006 Go to original source...
    8. BURGOS, S. 2013. Corporations and social responsibility: NGOs in the ascendancy. Journal of Business Strategy, 34(1): 21-29. DOI: 10.1108/02756661311301756 Go to original source...
    9. CHOI, C. J., CHENG, P., KIM, J.-B. et al. 2005. Dual responsibilities of NGOs: Market and institutional responsibilities and ethics. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17: 26-29. DOI: 10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2005.sp.00005 Go to original source...
    10. DEL BALDO, M. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some ''spirited businesses''. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(1): 1-36. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-009-9127-4 Go to original source...
    11. ĎURINOVÁ, I. 2017. The positive and negative aspects of tax administration as part of the business environment in Slovakia. Ekonomická revue - Central European Review of Economic Issues, 20: 61-72.
    12. EGELS-ZANDEN, N. and WAHLQVIST, E. 2007. Post-partnership strategies for defining corporate responsibility: The business social compliance initiative. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2): 175-189. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9104-7 Go to original source...
    13. ENDERLE, G. 1993. Action-oriented business ethics. Foundations and applications. [in German: Handlungsorientierte wirtschaftsethik. Grundlagen und anwendungen]. Bern: Haupt.
    14. ENDERLE, G. 1997. In search of a common ethical ground: Corporate environmental responsibility from the perspective of Christian environmental stewardship. Journal of Business Ethics, 16: 173-181. DOI: 10.1023/A:1017944430213 Go to original source...
    15. ETIKAN, I., MUSA, S. A. and ALKASSIM, R. S. 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1): 1-4. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 Go to original source...
    16. FREEMAN, R. E. 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 409-422. DOI: 10.2307/3857340 Go to original source...
    17. FREEMAN, R. E. 2017. The new story of business: Towards a more responsible capitalism. Business and Society Review, 122(3): 449-465. DOI: 10.1111/basr.12123 Go to original source...
    18. FREEMAN, R. E., MARTIN, K. and PARMAR, B. 2007. Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4): 303-314. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9517-y Go to original source...
    19. GOODPASTER, K. E. 1992. 'Business Ethics'. In: Becker, L. and Becker, C. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Ethics. New York: Garland Publishing, pp. 111-115.
    20. GOODPASTER, K. E. and MATTHEWS, J. B., Jr. 1989. Can a Corporation Have a Conscience? In: Harvard Business Review on Corporate Responsibility. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 131-155.
    21. HAGGARD, S. and TIEDE, L. 2011. The rule of law and economic growth: Where are we? World Development, 39(5): 673-685. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.10.007 Go to original source...
    22. HAVLÍK, V. and MAREŠ, M. 2017. Socio-cultural legacies in post-transition societies of Central and Easter Europe and the relationship to the resurgence of right-wing extremism and populism in the region. In: Heinisch, R. C., Holtz-Bacha, C. and Mazzoleni, O. (Eds.). Political Populism. International Studies on Populism no. 3. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 181-192. Go to original source...
    23. HELLMAN, J. and SCHANKERMAN, M. 2000. Intervention, corruption and capture. The nexus between enterprises and the state. Economics of Transition, 8(3): 545-576. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0351.00055 Go to original source...
    24. HORVÁTH, P., PUTTER, J. M., DAGILIENĖ, L. et al. 2017. Status quo and future development of sustainability reporting in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of East European Management Studies, 22(2): 221-243. DOI: 10.5771/0949-6181-2017-2-221 Go to original source...
    25. JOHNSON, S., MCMILLAN, J. and WOODRUFF, C. 2002. Property rights and finance. The American Economic Review, 92(5): 1335-1356. DOI: 10.1257/000282802762024539 Go to original source...
    26. JUST, N. and LATZER, M. 2016. Governance by algorithms: Reality construction by algorithmic selection on the Internet. Media, Culture & Society, 39(2): 238-258. DOI: 10.1177/0163443716643157 Go to original source...
    27. KAPTEIN, M. 2009. Ethics programs and ethical culture: A next step in unravelling their multi-faceted relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 89: 261-281. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9998-3 Go to original source...
    28. KAPTEIN, M. 2015. The effectiveness of ethics programs: The role of scope, composition, and sequence. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2): 415-431. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2296-3 Go to original source...
    29. KOURULA, A., and HALME, M. 2008. Types of corporate responsibility and engagement with NGOs: An exploration of business and societal outcomes. Corporate Governance, 8(4): 557-570. DOI: 10.1108/14720700810899275 Go to original source...
    30. LAASONEN, S., FOUGERE, M. and KOURULA, A. 2012. Dominant articulations in academic business and society discourse on NGO-business relations: A critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(4): 521-545. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-1143-z Go to original source...
    31. LAMBERTON, G. 2005. Sustainability sufficiency - An internally consistent version of sustainability. Sustainable Development, 13: 53-68. DOI: 10.1002/sd.245 Go to original source...
    32. MAJLUF, N. S. and NAVARRETE, C. M. 2011. A two-component compliance and ethics program model: An empirical application to Chilean corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100: 567-579. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0696-6 Go to original source...
    33. MISHLER, W. and ROSE, R. 1997. Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. The Journal of Politics, 59(2): 418-451. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381600053512 Go to original source...
    34. PILKOVÁ, A. and HOLIENKA, M. 2017. Entrepreneurship development in Slovakia. In: Sauka, A. and Chepurenko, A. (Eds.). Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies. Springer International Publishing, pp. 225-242. Go to original source...
    35. PUTNAM, R., LEONARDI, R. and NANNETI, R. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
    36. QUINN, J. J. 1997. Personal ethics and business ethics: The ethical attitudes of owner/ managers of small business. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2): 119-127. DOI: 10.1023/A:1017901032728 Go to original source...
    37. REICHEL, J., and RUDNICKA, A. 2009. Collaboration of NGOs and business in Poland. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(2): 126-140. DOI: 10.1108/17508610910981716 Go to original source...
    38. REMIŠOVÁ, A. 1997. Business ethics in Slovak economic practice. [in German: Unternehmensethik in der Slowakischen Wirtschaftspraxis]. Beiträge und Berichte Institut für Wirtschaftsethik an der Universität St. Gallen, Nr. 69.
    39. REMIŠOVÁ, A. 1998. Codes of ethics [in Slovak: Etické kódexy]. Bratislava: Ekonóm.
    40. REMIŠOVÁ, A. 2011. Ethics and economics [in Slovak: Etika a ekonomika]. Bratislava: Kalligram.
    41. REMIŠOVÁ, A., LAŠÁKOVÁ, A. and KIRCHMAYER, Z. 2017. Relevance of ethics program. Components in Slovakia. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 2(3), 24-31. DOI: 10.18775/jibrm.1849-8558.2015.23.3004 Go to original source...
    42. RUIZ, P., MARTINEZ, R., RODRIGO, J. et al. 2015. Level of coherence among ethics program components and its impact on ethical intent. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(4): 725-742. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2064-4 Go to original source...
    43. SCHWARTZ, M. 2001. The nature of the relationship between corporate codes of ethics and behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3): 247-262. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010787607771 Go to original source...
    44. STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC. 2018. Ecomomic subjects of the Slovak Republic in the BR by selected legal forms. DATAcube. [Online]. Available at: http://datacube.statistics.sk/#!/view/en/VBD_SLOVSTAT/og2015rs/Ecomomic%20subjects%20of%20the%20Slovak%20Republic%20in%20the%20BR%20by%20selected%20legal%20forms%20%5Bog2015rs%5D [Accessed: 2018, April 2].
    45. STEVENS, B. 2008. Corporate ethical codes: Effective instruments for influencing behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4): 601-609. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9370-z Go to original source...
    46. TREVINO, L. K. and BROWN, M. 2004. Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2): 69-81. Go to original source...
    47. TREVINO, L. K. and BROWN, M. 2005. The role of leaders in influencing unethical behavior in the workplace. In: Kidwell, R. E. and Martin, C. L. (Eds.). Managing organizational deviance. Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 69-79. Go to original source...
    48. TUCKER, L. R., STATHAKOPOLOUS, V. and PATTI, C. H. 1999. A multidimensional assessment of ethical codes: The professional business association perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(3): 287-300. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005805103665 Go to original source...
    49. VAN LIEDEKERKE, L. and DUBBINK, W. 2008. Twenty years of European business ethics - Past development and future concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2): 273-280. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9886-x Go to original source...
    50. ULRICH, P. 1994. Integrative business and corporate ethics - a framework concept [in German: Integrative wirtschaft- und unternehmensethik - ein rahmnenkonzept]. In: Markt und Moral. Diskussion um die Unternehmensethik. Bern: Haupt.
    51. VERBOS, A. K., GERARD, J. A., FORSHEY, P. R. et al. 2007. The positive ethical organization: Enacting a living code of ethics and ethical organizational identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 76: 17-33. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9275-2 Go to original source...
    52. WEAVER, G. R., TREVINO, L. K. and COCHRAN, P. L. 1999. Corporate ethics program as control systems: influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1): 41-57. Go to original source...
    53. WIELAND, C. 2009. NGOs and businesses. Move from conflict to cooperation. Colombia Internacional, 69: 86-107. DOI: 10.7440/colombiaint69.2009.05 Go to original source...
    54. ZAJKO, M. 2015. Strengths and weaknesses of innovation-driven entrepreneurship in Slovakia. In: 8th International Conference on Engineering & Business Education, Řstfold University College, Fredrikstad, Norway, 8 - 9 October 2015, pp. 88-94. Available at: http://www.icebe.net/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/2015/8-Proceeding_2015_final.pdf#page=97 [Accessed: 2018, November 14].

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content