Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67(2), 503-513 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967020503

Political Expenditure Cycle at the Municipal Government Level in Slovakia

Lenka Maličká
Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics, Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia

The idea of the political budget cycle impact on the public expenditure volume and structure raises discussion related mainly to the national government level. Political decision-making at the sub-national government level emulates certain common tendencies. In the election time, the political incumbent might seek for re-election. In aim to increase its own chances, it might manipulate the budget (or fiscal) policy and makes changes in the field of expenditure categories. In this paper, the existence of political expenditure cycle at the municipal level of government in Slovakia is investigated. The dynamic panel data model using the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) system estimator reveals the positive impact of election year variable on per capita municipal expenditure, while the additional pre-election year variable is insignificant.

Keywords: political cycle, local government, local expenditures, panel data, generalized method of moments
Grants and funding:

This paper was supported by VEGA no. 1/0806/18.

Received: January 30, 2018; Accepted: February 18, 2019; Published: April 29, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Maličká, L. (2019). Political Expenditure Cycle at the Municipal Government Level in Slovakia. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis67(2), 503-513. doi: 10.11118/actaun201967020503
Download citation

References

  1. AASKOVEN, L. 2017. Polity age and political budget cycles: Evidence from a Danish municipal reform. European Journal of Political Economy. In press. Go to original source...
  2. ARELLANO, M. and BOND, S. 1991. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58: 277-297. DOI: 10.2307/2297968 Go to original source...
  3. BALAGUER-COLL, M. T., BRUN-MARTOS, M. I., FORTE, A. et al. 2015. Local governments' re-election and its determinants: New evidence based on a Bayesian approach. European Journal of Political Economy, 39: 94-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.04.004 Go to original source...
  4. BASKARAN, T., BLESSE, S., BRENDER, A. et al. 2015. Revenue Decentralization, Central Oversight and the Political Budget Cycle: Evidence from Israel. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 15-046, Mannheim. Go to original source...
  5. BLUNDELL, R. and BOND, S. 1998. Initial Conditions and Moment Conditions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87: 115-143. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8 Go to original source...
  6. BOJAR, A. 2015. Intra-governmental bargaining and political budget cycles in the European Union. European Union Politics, 16(1): 90-115. DOI: 10.1177/1465116514547954 Go to original source...
  7. BOJAR, A. 2017. Do political budget cycles work? A micro-level investigation of pre-electoral budgeting and its electoral consequences. Electoral Studies, 45: 29-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.11.007 Go to original source...
  8. BOVE, V., EFTHYVOULOU, G. and NAVAS, A. 2017. Political cycles in public expenditure: butter vs guns. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45: 582-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2016.03.004 Go to original source...
  9. CASTRO, V. and MARTINS, R. 2015. Are there political cycles hidden inside government expenditures? Applied Economics Letters, 23(1): 1-4. Go to original source...
  10. CAZALS, A. and MANDON, P. 2016. Political Budget Cycles: Manipulation from Leaders or Manipulation from Researchers? Evidence from a Meta-Regression Analysis. Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur le Développement, Document No. 9. Clermont-Ferrand : CERDI.
  11. CHORTAREAS, G., LOGOTHETISB, V. and PAPANDREOU, A. 2016. Political budget cycles and reelection prospects in Greece's municipalities. European Journal of Political Economy, 43: 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.02.001 Go to original source...
  12. DATACENTRUM. 2000 - 2016. Recapitulation of the municipal revenue and expenditure according to the economic classification [in Slovak: Rekapitulácia príjmov a výdavkov obcí podľa ekonomickej klasifikácie]. Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava.
  13. DATACENTRUM. 2000 - 2016. Recapitulation of municipal expenditure according to the government functions classification [in Slovak: Rekapitulácia výdavkov obcí podľa funkčnej klasifikácie]. Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic, Bratislava.
  14. DOWNS, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2): 135-150. DOI: 10.1086/257897 Go to original source...
  15. DRAZEN, A. and ESLAVA, M. 2010. Electoral manipulation via voter-friendly spending: Theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 92: 39-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.01.001 Go to original source...
  16. DUDÁŠ-PAJERSKÁ, E. 2012. The Influence of an Atypic Course of Economic Cycles on the Political Cycle Running [in Slovak: Vplyv atypického chodu ekonomických cyklov na priebeh politického cyklu]. In: Kríza v politike - politika v kríze?: zborník z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie. February, 15 - 16, 2012. Prešov: Faculty of Arts, University of Prešov, pp. 350-360.
  17. EFTHYVOULOU, G. 2012. Political budget cycles in the European Union and the impact of political pressures. Public Choice, 153(3-4): 295-327. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-011-9795-x Go to original source...
  18. ENKELMAN, S. and LEIBRECHT, M. 2013. Political expenditure cycles and election outcomes: Evidence from disaggregation of public expenditures by economic functions. Economics Letters, 121 (1): 128-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.07.015 Go to original source...
  19. EUROSTAT GLOSSARY. 2017. Classification of the functions of government (COFOG). Luxembourg: European Commission.
  20. EUROSTAT DATABASE. 2018. General and Regional Statistics. Eurostat. [Online]. Luxembourg: European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/home
  21. FURDAS, M., HOMOLKOVA, K. and KIS-KATOS, K. 2015. Local Political Budget Cycles in a Federation: Evidence from West German Cities. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8798. Bonn: The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Go to original source...
  22. GARMANN, S. 2017. Political budget cycles and fiscally conservative voters. Economic Letters, 155(5): 72-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.03.023 Go to original source...
  23. HIBBS, D. 1997. Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review, 71(4): 1467-1487. DOI: 10.2307/1961490 Go to original source...
  24. HOOLARI, S. M. K. and OMRAN, V. T. 2017. Natural Budget Deficit and Natural Political Cyclicality. MPRA Paper No. 78107. Munich: Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
  25. IM, K. S., PESARAN, M. H. and SHIN, Y. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53-74 DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7 Go to original source...
  26. KLEIN, F. and SAKURAI, S. N. 2015. Term limits and political budget cycles at the local level: evidence from a young democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 37: 21-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.10.008 Go to original source...
  27. KÖPPL-TURYNA, K., KULA, G., BALMAS, A. et al. 2015. The effects of fiscal autonomy on the size of public sector and the strength of political budget cycles in local expenditure. MPRA Paper No. 66877. Munich: Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
  28. LABONNE, J. 2016. Local political business cycles: Evidence from Philippine municipalities. Journal of Development Economics, 121: 56-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.03.004 Go to original source...
  29. MALIČKÁ, L. 2016. Searching for fiscal decentralization constraining effect on local expenditure: case of Visegrad countries. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, 23(38): 68-80.
  30. MORVAY, K. et al. 2016. Economic Development of Slovakia in 2015 and Outlook up to 2017. Bratislava: Institute of Economic Research SAS.
  31. NORDHAUS, W. D. 1975. The Political Business Cycle. The Review of Economic Studies, 42(2): 169-190. DOI: 10.2307/2296528 Go to original source...
  32. SHI, M. and SVENSSON, J. 2006. Political budget cycles: do they differ across countries and why? Journal of Public Economics, 90: 1367-1389. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.09.009 Go to original source...
  33. SIČÁKOVÁ-BEBLAVÁ, E. and BEBLAVÝ, M. 2009. Decision Making of the Slovak Statutory Local Municipalities on Public Procurement Proceedings of Public Services. Journal of Economics, 57(7): 667-681.
  34. SIDORKIN, O. and VOROBYEV, D. 2017. Political cycles and corruption in Russian regions. European Journal of Political Economy. In press. Go to original source...
  35. SJAHRIR, B. S., KIS-KATOS, K. and SCHULZE, G. G. 2013. Political budget cycles in Indonesia at the district level. Economics Letters, 120: 342-345. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.05.007 Go to original source...
  36. ŠIKULOVÁ, I. and FRANK, K. 2013. The Slovak Experience with Transition to Market Economy. Working Paper 49. Bratislava: Institute of Economic Research SAS.
  37. ŠŤASTNÁ, L. 2015. Electoral Cycles in Public Expenditures: Evidence from Czech Local Governments. IES Working Paper 28/2015. IES FSV. Prague: Charles University.
  38. ŠTIKOVÁ, R. 2007. Models of Political Cycle and their Testing in the ČR Conditions [in Czech: Modely politického cyklu a jejich testování na podmínkách ČR]. IES Working Paper 18/2007. Prague: Institute of Economic Studies. Charles University.
  39. VEIGA, F. J., VEIGA, L. G. and MOROZUMI, A. 2017. Political budget cycles and media freedom. Electoral Studies, 45: 88-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2016.11.008 Go to original source...
  40. VERGNE, C. 2009. Democracy, Elections and Allocation of Public Expenditure in Developing Countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(1): 63-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.09.003 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.