Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67(2), 407-414 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967020407

The Effect of Age and Genotype on Quality of Eggs in Brown Egg-Laying Hybrids

Adam Kraus, Lukáš Zita
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic

The aim was to assess the internal and external quality of consumer eggs of egg-laying hens of two selected genotypes depending on their age. All of these hens were kept in enriched cages. There were compared eggs from Hy-Line Brown and ISA Brown hens at the age from 36 to 64 weeks. In total, 3840 eggs from 300 hens were evaluated. Quality of eggs was determined by their technological value. Statistically significant interactions (P = 0.001) between age and genotype were found in all evaluated parameters except for the yolk colour (P = 0.044), whereas there was not found interaction (P = 0.072) between age and genotype in eggshell strength. The significant effect of hens' age was found in all evaluated parameters, with the only exception of the yolk colour. The results showed that the average weight of eggs, eggshell, albumen and yolk increased with the age. Also the eggshell proportion, its colour and yolk index values increased, whereas the egg shape index, eggshell thickness and strength, albumen proportion, Haugh units, the albumen and the yolk index decreased. Statistically significant effect of the genotype was found in all evaluated parameters except for the yolk index. When comparing both genotypes, the eggs from ISA Brown hens had a better quality. The trend of deteriorating egg quality with age was confirmed.

Keywords: egg, quality, age, yolk, albumen, eggshell, brown-egg layers, ISA Brown, Hy-Line Brown
Grants and funding:

This research was funded by an ,,S" grant of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech republic. We are grateful to Anna Chalašová for English language correction of the manuscript.

Received: December 6, 2018; Accepted: February 4, 2019; Published: April 29, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kraus, A., & Zita, L. (2019). The Effect of Age and Genotype on Quality of Eggs in Brown Egg-Laying Hybrids. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis67(2), 407-414. doi: 10.11118/actaun201967020407
Download citation

References

  1. BOZKURT, Z. and TEKERLI, M. 2009. The Effects of Hen Age, Genotype, Period and Temperature of Storage on Egg Quality. Kafkas Űniversitesi Veteriner fakültesi Dergisi, 15(4): 517-524.
  2. ENGLMAIEROVÁ, M., TŮMOVÁ, E., CHARVÁTOVÁ, V. et al. 2014. Effects of laying hens housing system on laying performance, egg quality characteristics, and egg microbial contamination. Czech Journal of Animal Sciences, 59(8): 345-352. DOI: 10.17221/7585-CJAS Go to original source...
  3. GUERRERO - LEGARRETA, I. 2010. Handbook of Poultry Science and Technology. Volume 1. A. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publication. Go to original source...
  4. HALAJ, M. and GOLIAN, J. 2011. Eggs for biological, technical and food use [in Slovak: Vajce biologické, technické a potravinárske využitie]. Nitra: Garmond.
  5. HENDRIX GENETICS. 2018. Integra - ISA Brown. Hendrix Genetics. [Online]. Available at: https://www.integrazabcice.cz/cs/produkty/isa-brown-cz/ [Accessed: 2018, December 4].
  6. HY-LINE. 2018. Hyline Product information, chickens, genetics, poultry, eggs, diseases, technology, breeds, farming, egg production. Hy-Line. [Online]. Available at: http://www.hyline.com/aspx/products/productinformation.aspx [Accessed: 2018, December 4].
  7. IANNOTTI, L. L., LUTTER, C. K., BUNN, D. A. et al. 2014. Eggs: The Uncracked Potential for Improving Maternal and Young Child Nutrition among the World's Poor. Nutrition Reviews, 72(6): 355-368. DOI: 10.1111/nure.12107 Go to original source...
  8. JOHNSTON, S. A. and GOUS, R. M. 2007. Modelling the changes in the proportions of the egg components during a laying cycle. British Poultry Science, 48(3): 347-353. DOI: 10.1080/00071660701381134 Go to original source...
  9. JONES, D. R., MUSGROVE, M. T., ANDERSON, K. E. et al. 2010. Physical quality and composition of retail shell eggs. Poultry Science, 89(3): 582-587. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2009-00315 Go to original source...
  10. KETTA, M. and TŮMOVÁ, E. 2017. Relationship between eggshell thickness and other eggshell measurements in eggs from litter and cages. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 17(1): 234-239. DOI: 10.1080/1828051X.2017.1344935 Go to original source...
  11. KOCEVSKI, D., NIKOLOVA, N. and KUZELOV, A. 2011. The influence of strain and age on some egg quality parameters of commercial laying hens. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 27(4): 1649-1658. DOI: 10.2298/BAH1104649K Go to original source...
  12. KRAWCZYK, J. 2009. Effect of layer age and egg production on level on changes in quality traits of eggs from hen conversation Leeds and commercial hybrids. Animal Science, 9(2): 185-193.
  13. KUL, S. and SEKER, I. 2004. Phenotypic Correlations Between Some External and Internal Egg Quality Traits in the Japanese Quail (Cuturnix cuturnix japonica). International Journal of Poultry Science, 3(6): 400-405. Go to original source...
  14. LEDVINKA, Z. and KLESALOVÁ, L. 2002. Weight of eggs and factors that influences it [in Czech: Hmotnost vajec a faktory, které ji ovlivňují]. Náš chov, 62(7): 54
  15. LEDVINKA, Z., ZITA, L. and TŮMOVÁ, E. 2009. Selected chapters from poultry breeding [in Czech: Vybrané kapitoly z chovu drůbeže]. Praha: Powerprint s.r.o.
  16. LEDVINKA, Z., ZITA, L., TYLLER, M. et al. 2014. Effect of genotype, feather growth-rate gene and the age on the egg quality. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20(6): 1466-1471.
  17. MATT, D., VEROMANN, E, and LUIK, A. 2009. Effect of housing systems on biochemical composition of chicken eggs. Agronomy Research, 7(2): 662-667.
  18. MOLNÁR, A., MAERTENS, L., AMPE, B. et al. 2016. Changes in egg quality traits during the last phase of production: is there potential for an extended laying cycle? British Poultry Science, 57(6): 842-847. DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2016.1209738 Go to original source...
  19. NAGY, J. BARANOVÁ, M., BARTÁKOVÁ, K. et al. 2009. Hygiene of poultry, eggs and venison - 1st part [in Slovak: Hygiena mäsa hydiny, vajec a zveriny - 1. diel]. Košice: Univerzita veterinárskeho lekárstva.
  20. RAKIB, T. M., AKTER, L., BARUA, S. R. et al. 2016. Effects of age, rearing system and their interaction on phenotypic characteristics in hisex brown laying hens. Scientific Journal of Veterinary Advances, 5(5): 87-96.
  21. SAS INSTITUTE. 2011. SAS User's Guide. Statistics. Version 9.4 ed. Cary, NC: SAS Inst. Inc.
  22. SOKOŁOWICZ, Z., KRAWCZYK, J. and DYKIEL, M. 2018. Effect of alternative housing system and genotype on egg quality characteristics. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 30(8): 695-703. DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i8.1753 Go to original source...
  23. TANG, S. G. H., SIEO, C. C., KALAVATHY, R. et al. 2015. Chemical Compositions of Egg Yolks and Egg Quality of Laying Hens Fed Prebiotic, Probiotic, and Synbiotic Diets. Journal of Food Science, 80(8): 1686-1695. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.12947 Go to original source...
  24. TŮMOVÁ, E., ZITA, L., HUBENÝ, M. et al. 2007. The effect of oviposition time and genotype on egg quality characteristics in egg type hens. Czech Journal Animal Science, 52(1): 26-30. DOI: 10.17221/2326-CJAS Go to original source...
  25. ZAHEER, K. 2015. An Updated Review on Chicken Eggs: Production, Consumption, Management Aspects and Nutritional Benefits to Human Health. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 6: 1208-1220. DOI: 10.4236/fns.2015.613127 Go to original source...
  26. ZITA, L., TŮMOVÁ, E. and ŠTOLC, L. 2009. Effects of genotype, age and their interaction on egg quality in brown-egg laying hens. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 78(1): 85-91. DOI: 10.2754/avb200978010085 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.