Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67(2), 383-393 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967020383

Comparison of Different Texture Analysis for Soil Erodibility Calculations of Loamy and Sandy-Loam Soils in Moravian Regions

Miroslav Dumbrovský, Lucie Larišová, Veronika Sobotková, Martina Kulihová
Institute of Water Landscape Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Veveří 95, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The subject of this article is a comparison of results of soil texture analysis of loamy and sandy-loam soils for soil erodibilty calculation using the Casagrande areometric method and results obtained by the laser diffraction method. A comparison was made of 27 samples taken from the Větřkovice locality, and 18 samples taken from the Hustopeče locality. On the basis of laboratory analysis of the soil samples, curves of grain composition were plotted, and the soils were divided into grain-size groups according to the ratio of individual fractions. For comparison of the results, the soils' regression dependence, with linear, exponential, quadratic and polynomic trends were derived. Applying these different methods for determining soil texture may affect the determination of K factor values and the value of soil loss. The results show that the laser diffraction method provides higher values of % silt and % silty sand at both model sites. Using the K values determining from Casagrande method measuring can led to the underestimation of soil erodibility. This underestimation can be explained by a change in particle size distribution between the described methods used.

Keywords: soil texture, soil grain fraction, areometric method, laser diffraction method, particle size distribution curve, soil erodibility factor, soil loss
Grants and funding:

This paper was supported by the Czech National Agency for Agricultural Research (Project No. QJ1520268 and Project No. QK1720303).

Received: January 17, 2019; Accepted: January 23, 2019; Published: April 29, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dumbrovský, M., Larišová, L., Sobotková, V., & Kulihová, M. (2019). Comparison of Different Texture Analysis for Soil Erodibility Calculations of Loamy and Sandy-Loam Soils in Moravian Regions. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis67(2), 383-393. doi: 10.11118/actaun201967020383
Download citation

References

  1. DUFKOVÁ, J., TOMAN, F., and ŠŤASTNÁ, M. 2005. Comparison of methods for determination of soil erodibility factor K. Acta univ. agric. et silvic. Mendel. Brun., 53(5): 197-206. DOI: 10.11118/actaun200553050197 Go to original source...
  2. CENTERI, C. 2002. Importance of local soil erodibility measurements in soil loss prediction Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 50(1): 43-51. DOI: 10.1556/AAgr.50.2002.1.6 Go to original source...
  3. CENTERI,C., SZALAI, Z., JAKAB, G. et al. 2015. Soil erodibility calculations based on different particle size distribution measurements. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 64(1): 17-23. DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.64.1.2 Go to original source...
  4. DUMBROVSKÝ, M. 2014. Soil degradation and its impact on the complex of the soil properties, including the design of corrective measures to restore the agro-ecological functions of soil. Project NAZV QJ1230066. Brno: VUT v Brně.
  5. FRAUNHOFER, J. 1815. Bestimmung des Brechungs- und des Farben-Zerstreuungs - Vermögens verschiedener Glasarten, in Bezug auf die Vervollkommnung achromatischer Fernröhre. Denkschriften der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München, 5: 193-226.
  6. ESHEL, G., LEVY, G., J., MINGELGRIN, U. et al. 2004. Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particle - size distribution analysis. Soil Sc. Soc. Am. J., 68(3): 736-743. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.7360 Go to original source...
  7. FRITSCH. 2016. Laser particle analyzer. Catalogue. [Online]. Available at: http://www.ilabo.cz/UserFiles/File/eshop/672/d_ANALYSETTE%2022%20CZ.pdf [Accessed: 2016, June 10]
  8. JANDÁK, J., POKORNÁ, E. and PRAX, A. 2007. Pedology. Textbook. Brno: MZLU v Brně.
  9. JANEČEK, M., DOSTÁL, T., KOZLOVSKY DUFKOVÁ, J. et al. 2012. Protection of agricultural land from erosion. Praha: Powerprint.
  10. JESENÁK, K. 2008. Particle size analysis. Bratislava: UK.
  11. KAMENÍČKOVÁ, I. 2013. Instructions for Exercise (VHK) Hydropedology. Study support. Brno: VUT v Brně.
  12. KONDRLOVÁ, E., IGAZ, D. and HORÁK, J. 2011. Analysis of distribution of granular fractions of medium-heavy soils by laser diffraction: methods of sample preparation for analysis. In: Transport vody, chemikálií a energie v systéme pôda - rastlina - atmosféra: 19. Posterový deň s medzinárodnou účasťou.
  13. KONDRLOVÁ, E., IGAZ, D., HORÁK, J. et al. 2013. Soil texture analysis by optical method laboratory experiment on sample preparation prior to analysis. In: Water resources. Forest, marine and ocean ecosystems. Proceedings of the 13th International Multidisciplinary Scientifi c Geoconference SGEM. Sofia, pp. 677-683. Go to original source...
  14. LEDVINA, R. et al. 2000. Geology and Soil science. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích.
  15. MAŠÁT, K., NĚMEČEK, J. and TOMIŠKA, Z. 2002. Methodology of demarcation and mapping of bonitated soil ecological units. Praha: VÚMOP.
  16. MIE, G. 1908. Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen. Annal. Physik, 25: 377-445. DOI: 10.1002/andp.19083300302 Go to original source...
  17. NĚMEČEK J. et al. 2001. Taxonomic Classification System of Soils of the Czech Republic. Praha: ČZU.
  18. SOBOTKOVÁ, V. 2012. Volumetric quantification of the effects of water erosion and their influence on the complex of selected soil characteristics. Dissertation. Brno: Vysoké učení technické v Brně.
  19. VALLA, M., KOZÁK, J. and DRBAL, J. 1980. Practice in pedology - II. Scripture. Praha: VŠZ.
  20. VANDECASTEELE, B. and DE VOS, B. 2001. Relationship between soil textural fractions determined by the sieve-pipette method and laser diffractometry.
  21. VOPRAVIL, J., JANEČEK, M. and TIPPL, M. 2007. Revised Soil Erodibility K-factor for Soils in the Czech Republic. Soil & Water Research, 2: 1-9. DOI: 10.17221/2100-SWR Go to original source...
  22. WISCHMEIER, W. H. and SMITH, D. D. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion loss: a guide to conservation planning. Handbook. No. 537. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department Agric.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.