Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67(1), 101-110 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967010101

Efficacy and Crop Safety of Soil Herbicides in the Fruit Nursery

Klára Kyselová, Jan Náměstek, Luděk Laňar, Martin Mészáros
Department of Technology, Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology Holovousy Ltd., Holovousy 129, 508 01 Hořice, Czech Republic

The research was conducted in the fruit nursery of the Research and Breeding Institute of Pomology (RBIP) Holovousy, Czech Republic in 2015, 2016 and 2017. The efficacy and potential phytotoxic effect of soil herbicides were assessed in spring-planted and summer-budded rootstocks M9, MA, Gisela 5 and St. Julien A in seven treatments with the following herbicides: linuron, metazachlor, metamitron, chlorotoluron, dimethenamid-P, pendimethalin, and combination of pendimethalin and dimethenamid-P in one product. The effects of the surfactant and simulated rainfall in combination with the pendimethalin + dimethenamid-P treatment were also assessed. Herbicides were applied twice a season, i.e. in spring after planting and in autumn to control weeds emerging during the season. The efficacy of the herbicide combining both pendimethalin and dimethenamid-P was the highest in all three seasons. Metazachlor, pendimethalin and dimethenamid-P provided satisfactory efficacy with adequate soil moisture. Pre-emergent efficacy of metamitron, linuron and chlorotoluron was not satisfactory, especially in dryer conditions. The synergistic effect of the surfactant and rainfall on the efficacy of pendimethalin in combination with dimethenamid-P was proved in the dry year only. None of the tested herbicides had a negative effect either on the growth and health status of planted rootstocks or subsequently on budded plants in the following year.

Keywords: weed, rootstocks, pre-emergent, soil moisture, surfactant, phytotoxicity
Grants and funding:

The research was supported by projects: NAZV nr. QJ 1510081 and project NPU I. nr. LO1608.

Received: October 8, 2018; Accepted: January 7, 2019; Published: February 28, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kyselová, K., Náměstek, J., Laňar, L., & Mészáros, M. (2019). Efficacy and Crop Safety of Soil Herbicides in the Fruit Nursery. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis67(1), 101-110. doi: 10.11118/actaun201967010101
Download citation

References

  1. ATLAND, J. E. 2005. Weed control in nursery field production. North Willamette Research and Extension Center. Aurora, USA: Oregon State University Extension Service.
  2. ATLAND, J. E., GILLIAM, CH. H. and WEHTJE, G. 2003. Weed control in field nurseries. HortTechnology, 13(1): 9-14. DOI: 10.21273/HORTTECH.13.1.0009 Go to original source...
  3. BRETH, D. 2013. What is the best herbicide for new apple plantings? Albion, USA: Cornell Cooperative Extension.
  4. GLOWACKA, A. 2011. Dominant weeds in maize (Zea mays L.) cultivation and their competitiveness under conditions of various methods of weed control. Acta Agrobotanica, 64(2): 119-126. DOI: 10.5586/aa.2011.023 Go to original source...
  5. HALINIARZ, M. 2013. Effectiveness of weed control in winter wheat according to the dose of chlorotoluron (Lentipur Flo 500 SC) [in Polish: Skuteczno¶ć zwalczania chwastów w pszenicy ozimej w zależno¶ci od dawki chlorotoluronu (Lentipur Flo 500 SC)]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, 69(3): 20-31.
  6. HANSON, B. D. and SCHNEIDER, S. A. 2008. Evaluation of weed control and crop safety with herbicides in open field tree nursery. Weed Technology, 22(3): 493-498. DOI: 10.1614/WT-08-021.1 Go to original source...
  7. HAROON, M., SAEED, M., AHMAD, I., KHAN, R., BIBI, S., KHATTAK, S. U. and HIDAYATULLAH. 2014. Weed density and strawberry yields as affected by herbicides and mulching techniques. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 20(1): 67-75.
  8. HELLING, C. S. 2005. The science of soil residual herbicides. In: Van Acker, R. C. (Ed.). Soil Residual Herbicides: Science and Management. Topics in Canadian Weed Science, Volume 3. Sainte-Anne-de Bellevue, Québec: Canadian Weed Science Society, pp. 3-22.
  9. KVIKLYS, D. 2009. Tolerance of apple propagation material to herbicides. Scientific Works of the Lithuanian Institute of Horticulture and Lithuanian University of Agriculture. Sodininkystė ir darľininkystė, 28(3): 109-115.
  10. LEBUDE, A. V., BILDERBACK, T. E., NEAL, J., ADKINS, C., SAFELY, CH. and FEITSHANS, T. 2007. A manual for field production of nursery stock. Raleigh, USA: North Carolina Cooperative Extension.
  11. MAURICE, D. C. 2005. Managing soil residual herbicide use in Western Canada. In: Van Acker, R. C. (Ed.) Soil Residual Herbicides: Science and Management. Topics in Canadian Weed Science, Volume 3. Sainte-Anne-de Bellevue, Québec: Canadian Weed Science Society, pp. 101-113.
  12. PETCU, V., OPREA, G., CIONTU, C. and STEFANIC, G. 2015. Studies on the effect of some herbicides (single and different mixtures) on weeds control and soil quality in maize. Romanian Agricultural Research, 32: 245-252.
  13. POONIA, T. C., MATHUKIA, K., and KARWASARA, K. 2017. Residues of pendimethalin, oxyfluorfen, quizalofop-ethyl and imazethapyr in groundnut and their persistence in soil. Journal of Crop and Weed, 13(2): 194-202.
  14. PRODANOVA-MARINOVA, N. 2015. Biological efficacy of some herbicides in vine nursery. Journal of Mountain Agriculture on the Balkans, 18(4): 702-713.
  15. PRODANOVA-MARINOVA, N. and KOŇOVA, E. 2015. Studies on herbicides application in vine nurseries. In: ©losár, M. (Ed.). Scientific proceedings of the 5th International Scientific Horticulture Conference. Nitra: Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, pp. 105-110.
  16. PRODANOVA-MARINOVA, N., DIMITROVA, M. and ZHELYAZKOV, I. 2016. Comparative testing of Stomp 33 EC and Wing P in vine nursery. In: Kovačević, D. (Ed.) Book of proceedings VII International Scientific Agriculture Symposium. Agrosym 2016, 6-9 October 2016. Jahorina, Bosnia and Herzegovina: University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture, pp. 1555-1560.
  17. R CORE TEAM. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  18. RANKOVA, Z. 2006. Effect of some soil herbicides on the vegetative habits of mahaleb cherry (Prunus mahaleb L.) seedling rootstocks. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 12 (3): 429-433.
  19. RANKOVA, Z. 2011. Possibilities of applying soil herbicides in fruit nurseries - phytotoxicity and selectivity. In: Larramendy, M. (Ed.). Herbicides, Theory and applications. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Publisher, pp. 495-526. Go to original source...
  20. RANKOVA, Z. and ZHIVONDOV, A. 2010. Influence of weed control chemicals on vegetative habit of young sweet cherry plantations. Journal of Pomology, 44(171/172): 129-135.
  21. RANKOVA, Z., KOUMANOV, K. S., KOLEV, K. and SHILEV, S. 2009. Herbigation in a cherry orchard-efficiency of pendimethalin. Acta Horticulturae, 825: 459-464. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.825.72 Go to original source...
  22. RANKOVA, Z., NACHEVA, L. and GERCHEVA, P. 2016. Growth habits of the vegetative apple rootstock MM 106 after treatment with some soil herbicides under in vitro conditions. In: Zhivondov, A., Gercheva, P., Koumanov, K. (Eds.). I Balkan Symposium on Fruit Growing. Plovdiv, Bulgaria, pp. 49-54. Go to original source...
  23. ROBINSON, D. W. 1999. Re-evaluating the role of herbicides in contemporary urban horticulture. In: International Symposium on Urban Tree Health. Paris, France, 496, pp. 37-44. Go to original source...
  24. SIKKEMA, P. H. and ROBINSON, D. E. 2005. Residual herbicides: An integral component of weed management systems in Eastern Canada. In: Van Acker, R. C. (Ed.) Soil Residual Herbicides: Science and Management. Topics in Canadian Weed Science, Volume 3. Sainte-Anne-de Bellevue, Québec: Canadian Weed Science Society, pp. 89-99.
  25. SOMERVILLE, G. J., POWLES, S. B., WALSH, M. J. and RENTON, M. 2017. Why was resistance to shorter-acting pre-emergence herbicides slower to evolve? Pest Management Science, 73(5): 844-851. DOI: 10.1002/ps.4509 Go to original source...
  26. THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2017. Commission Implementing Regulation 2017/244 of 10 February 2017 concerning the non-renewal of approval of the active substance linuron, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU). OJ 2 36/54. Brussles: European Commission.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.