Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2018, 66(6), 1517-1525 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866061517

Free-rider Problem in Classroom Games - Impact of Gender and Intergroup Conditions

Soňa Kukučková, Pavel Žiaran
Department of Finance, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Behavioural experiments in the field of provision of public goods (including free rider problem) help to uncover the underlying processes and forces determining the nature of economy in the public sector. The objective of this paper is to determine the impact of gender and intergroup conditions on the extent of cooperation in standard linear public goods game using the voluntary contribution mechanism. Design of the teaching experiment is based on the methodology of Špalek (2011) with some modification. There were 80 undergraduate students of business participating in the classroom game, age range 20-22 years. Students were divided into three independent groups by 26 to 27 participants. Each group was playing independently, and individual strategies were recorded. We used the nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis Test) to analyse the differences between the gender and groups. Findings do not show statistically significant difference based on gender. On the other hand, the intergroup conditions determined by the social dynamics and discussion have significant influence on the distribution of goods. Results bring strong evidence on the importance of social and political factors influencing the pro-social behaviour in the society.

Keywords: public goods game, voluntary contribution mechanism, free-rider problem, cooperation, gender

Published: December 19, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kukučková, S., & Žiaran, P. (2018). Free-rider Problem in Classroom Games - Impact of Gender and Intergroup Conditions. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(6), 1517-1525. doi: 10.11118/actaun201866061517
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AGUIAR, F., BRAÑAS-GARZA, P., COBO-REYES, R., JIMENEZ, N. and MILLER, L. M. 2009. Are women expected to be more generous? Experimental Economics, 12(1): 93-98. DOI: 10.1007/s10683-008-9199-z Go to original source...
    2. AMES E. E. and MARWELL, G. 1981. Economist free ride, does anyone else? Experiments in the provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 15(3): 295-310. Go to original source...
    3. ANDREONI, J. 1988. Why free ride? Strategies and learning in public goods experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 37(3): 291-304. DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(88)90043-6 Go to original source...
    4. BEIL, R. and NELSON, R. G. 1994. When Self-interest is Self-Defeating: The Public Goods Experiment as a Teaching Tool. Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics, 26(2): 580-590. Go to original source...
    5. BERNÁ, Z. and ŠPALEK, J. 2011. Threshold Effectiveness in Contributing to the Public Goods: Experiments Involving Czech Students. Prague Economic Papers, 3: 250-267. Go to original source...
    6. BERNÁ, Z. 2014. Voluntary cooperation in experiment with public goods. Doctoral thesis. Brno: Masaryk University.
    7. BOHM, P. 1972. Estimating demand for public goods: An experiment. European Economic Review, 3(2): 111-130. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2921(72)90001-3 Go to original source...
    8. BROWN-KRUSE, J. and HUMMELS, D. 1992. Gender effects in laboratory public goods contribution: Do individuals put their money where their mouth is? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 22(3): 255-267. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(93)90001-6 Go to original source...
    9. BRUTTEL, L. and STOLLEY, F. 2018. Gender Differences in the Response to Decision Power and Responsibility-Framing Effects in a Dictator Game. Games, 9(2): 28. DOI: 10.3390/g9020028 Go to original source...
    10. CADSBY, C. B. and MAYNES, E. 1998. Gender and free riding in a threshold public goods game: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34(4): 603-620. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2681(97)00010-3 Go to original source...
    11. DAWES, R. M. 1980. Social dilemmas. Annual review of psychology, 31(1): 169-193. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125 Go to original source...
    12. DAWES, R. M., MCTAVISH, J. and SHAKLEE, H. 1977. Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 35(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.35.1.1 Go to original source...
    13. FRANK, R., GILOVICH, T. and REGAN, D. 1993. Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2): 159-171. DOI: 10.1257/jep.7.2.159 Go to original source...
    14. GILLIGAN, C. 1982. In a different voice, psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    15. HOLT, A. CH. and LAURY, S. K. 1997. Voluntary Provision of a Public Good. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4): 209-215. DOI: 10.1257/jep.11.4.209 Go to original source...
    16. ISAAC, R. M. and WALKER, J. M. 1988. Communication and Free-Riding Behavior: The Voluntary Contribution Mechanism. Economic Inquiry, 26(4): 585-608. DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01519.x Go to original source...
    17. LEDYARD, J. 1995. Public Goods. A Survey of Experimental Research. In: KAGEL, J. H. and ROTH, A. E. (Eds.). Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 111-194. Go to original source...
    18. LEUTHOLD, J. H. 1992. A Free Rider Experiment for Large Class. Faculty working paper No. 92-0157, digitized at Urbana Campaign 2011.University of Illinois. Available at: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/29376/freeriderexperim92157leut.pdf?sequence=2. [Accessed: 2018, April 13].
    19. LEUTHOLD, J. H. 1987. A public goods experiment for the classroom. Journal of Economic Education, 18(1): 58-65. DOI: 10.1080/00220485.1987.10845189 Go to original source...
    20. MC CORKLE, S. and WATTS, M. 1996. Free Riding Indexes for Ukrainian Economics Teachers. Journal of Economic Education, 18: 233-237. DOI: 10.1080/00220485.1996.10844913 Go to original source...
    21. NOWELL, C. and TINKLER, S. 1994. The influence of gender on the provision of a public good. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25: 25-36. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90084-1 Go to original source...
    22. ORTMANN, A. and TICHY, L. 1999. Gender differences in the laboratory: evidence from prisoner's dilemma games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39: 327-339. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00038-4 Go to original source...
    23. RAPOPORT, A. and CHAMMAH, A. 1965. Prisoners dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Go to original source...
    24. STIGLITZ, J. E. 1988. Economics for the Public Sector. 3rd Edition. New York: Norton.
    25. ŠPALEK, J. 2011. Veřejné statky. Teorie a experiment. 1st Edition. Prague: C. H. Beck.
    26. ŠPALEK, J. and BERNÁ, Z. 2011. Threshold Effectiveness in Contributing to the Public Goods: Experiments Involving Czech Students. Prague Economic Papers, 3: 250-267. DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.399 Go to original source...
    27. VYRASTEKOVA, J., SENT, E. M. and VAN STAVEREN, I. 2015. Gender Beliefs and Cooperation in a Public Goods Game. Economics Bulletin, 35(2): 1148-1153.
    28. WATTS, M. and GUEST, R. 2010. Experimental Economics and Economic Education. Editorial Issue 9. 2. International Review of Economics Education, 9(2): 6-9. DOI: 10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30045-1 Go to original source...
    29. ZELMER, J. 2001. Linear Public Goods Experiments: A Meta-Analysis. Report no.361. The Research institute for Quantitative Studies in Economics and Population. Available at: http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/qsep/p/qsep361.pdf [Accessed 2018, August 17].

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content