Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2018, 66(6), 1469-1475 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866061469

Relationship Between Deferred Tax Category and Stock Prices in Pharmacy

Petr Habanec
Department of Accounting and Taxes, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The paper deals with relationship between stock prices and deferred tax category. Joos, Pratt and Young provided evidence that book-tax differences are correlated with earning management. In this paper is confirmed negative relationship between stock prices and deferred tax. The relationship is assessed on sample of companies making business in pharmacy (CZNACE-C-21). The relationship between deferred tax category and stock prices is assessed on a sample of companies in the time series from 2005 to 2015. Sample consists of companies listed on Frankfurt stock exchange and reporting in accordance with international accounting standards IAS/IFRS. The stock prices dataset is based on Morningstar database. The results are compared with the results of author 's previous study concerning the deferred tax materiality.

Keywords: deferred tax category, stock prices, pharmacy
Grants and funding:

This paper was supported by Internal Grant Agency [PEF_DP_2018007] Mendel University Brno.

Published: December 19, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Habanec, P. (2018). Relationship Between Deferred Tax Category and Stock Prices in Pharmacy. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(6), 1469-1475. doi: 10.11118/actaun201866061469
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BLAYLOCK, B., SHELVIN, T. and WILSON, R. J. 2012. Tax Avoidance, Large Positive Temporary Book-Tax Differences, and Earnings Persistence. The Accounting Review, 87(1): 91-120. DOI: 10.2308/accr-10158 Go to original source...
    2. BOHUŠOVÁ, H. and SVOBODA, P. 2005. Deferred tax analysis and impact on firm's economic efficiency ratios. Acta Univ. Agric. et Silvic. Mendel. Brun., 53(6): 33-44. DOI: 10.11118/actaun200553060033 Go to original source...
    3. COLLEY, R. J. R., VALENCIA, A. and VOLKAN, A. 2012. Accounting for Deferred Taxes: Time for a Change. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 10(3): 149-156. Go to original source...
    4. CRABTREE, A. and MAHER, J. 2009. The influence of differences in taxable income and book income on the bond credit market. American Accounting Association, 31(1): 75-99. Go to original source...
    5. DESAI, M. A. 2003. The Divergence between Book and Tax Income. In: POTERBA, J. M. (Ed.). Tax Policy and the Economy, 17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 169-206. Go to original source...
    6. DONOHOE, M. P. and McGILL, G. A. 2011. The Effects of Increased Book-Tax Difference Tax Return Disclosures on Firm Valuation and Behavior. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 33(2): 35-65. DOI: 10.2308/atax-10056 Go to original source...
    7. EVANS, J. D. 1996. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks/Cole Publ. Co.
    8. GORDON, E. A. and JOOS, P. R. 2004. Unrecognized Deferred Taxes: Evidence from the U.K. The Accounting Review, 79(1): 97-124. DOI: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.1.97 Go to original source...
    9. HABANEC, P. 2018. Comparison of deferred tax materiality in pharmacy and in chemistry. In: PEFnet 2017: Proceedings. Brno: Mendelova univerzita v Brně, pp. 70-75.
    10. HABANEC, P. 2017. Významnost kategorie odložené daně v závislosti na vykazování dle kontinentálního a anglosaského systému účetního výkaznictví. In: Nové trendy 2017: sborník příspěvků. Znojmo: Soukromá vysoká škola ekonomická Znojmo, s.r.o., pp. 148-156.
    11. HABANEC, P. and BOHUŠOVÁ, H. 2017. Deferred tax materiality reporting in accordance with Czech national legislation and with IFRS. In: Enterprise and Competitive Environment: Conference Proceedings. Brno: Mendelova univerzita v Brně, 2017, s. 308-317.
    12. HANLON, M. 2005. The Persistence and Pricing of Earnings, Accruals, and Cash Flows When Firms Have Large Book-Tax Differences. The Accounting Review, 80(1): 137-166. DOI: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.137 Go to original source...
    13. HANLON, M., HOOPES, J. L. and SHROFF, N. 2014.The Effect of Tax Authority Monitoring and Enforcement on Financial Reporting Quality. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 36(2): 137-170. DOI: 10.2308/atax-50820 Go to original source...
    14. HOLLAND, K. and JACKSON, R. H. G. 2003. Earnings management and deferred tax. Accounting and Business Research, 34(2): 101-123. DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2004.9729956 Go to original source...
    15. CHI, S. S., PINCUS, M. and TEOH, S. H. 2014. Mispricing of Book-Tax Differences and the Trading Behavior of Short Sellers and Insiders. The Accounting Review, 89(2): 511-543. DOI: 10.2308/accr-50644 Go to original source...
    16. CHLUDEK, A. K. 2011.The Impact of Deferred Taxes on Firm Value. Dissertation thesis. Der Wirtschafts - und Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät, der Universität zu Köln.
    17. JOOS, P., PRATT, P. and YOUNG, S. D. 2002. Using deferred taxes to infer the quality of accruals (Mimeo). Paris and Cambridge, MA: INSEAD and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    18. JACKSON, M. 2015. Book-Tax Differences and Future Earnings Changes. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 37(2): 49-73. DOI: 10.2308/atax-51164 Go to original source...
    19. LAUX, R. C. 2013. The Association between Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities and Future Tax Payments. The Accounting Review, 88(4): 1357-1383. DOI: 10.2308/accr-50417 Go to original source...
    20. LEV, B. and NISSIM, D. 2004. Taxable Income, Future Earnings, and Equity Values. The Accounting Review, 79(4): 1039-1074. DOI: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.1039 Go to original source...
    21. MANZON, G. B. and PLESKO, G. A. 2002. The Relation Between Financial and Tax Reporting Measures of Income. Tax Law Review, 55(2): 175-214. Go to original source...
    22. NOBES, C. and PARKER R. H. 2010. Comparative International Accounting. Financial Times and Prentice Hall.
    23. NOGA, T. J. and SCHNADER, A. L. 2013. Book-Tax Differences as an Indicator of Financial Distress. Accounting Horizons, 27(3): 469-489. DOI: 10.2308/acch-50481 Go to original source...
    24. PHILLIPS, J., PINCUS, M. and REGO, S. O. 2003. Earnings Management: New Evidence Based on Deferred Tax Expense. The Accounting Review, 78(2): 491-521. DOI: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.2.491 Go to original source...
    25. PLESKO, G. A. 2004. Corporate Tax Avoidance and the Properties of Corporate Earnings. National Tax Journal, 57(3): 729-737. DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2004.3.12 Go to original source...
    26. POTERBA, J., NIRUPAMA, M. S., RAO, J. and SEIDMAN, K. 2011. Deferred tax positions and incentives for corporate behavior around corporate tax changes. National Tax Journal, 64: 27-77. DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2011.1.02 Go to original source...
    27. SHACKELFORD, D. A., SLEMROD, J. and SALLEE, J. M. 2011. Financial reporting, tax, and real decisions: toward a unifying framework. Int. Tax Public Finance, 18: 461-494. DOI: 10.1007/s10797-011-9176-x Go to original source...
    28. VERBEEK, M. 2012. A guide to modern econometrics. 4th Edition. Chichester: Wiley.
    29. VUČKOVIĆ-MILUTINOVIĆ, S. and LUKIĆ, R. 2013. Analysis of Deferred Taxes in the Business Environment in Serbia. Economia, Seria Management, 16(1): 25-37.
    30. WEBER, D. P. 2009. Do analysts and investors fully appreciate the implications of book-tax differences for future earnings? Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(4): 1175-1206. DOI: 10.1506/car.26.4.7 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content