Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2018, 66(5), 1249-1259 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866051249
The Effect of Price Increases on Fresh Meat Consumption in Turkey
- Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey
The rapid increase of the red meat price in Turkey in the recent years negatively affects its consumption. Consumers are seeking to compensate for the need for animal protein with cheaper substitution products. In this study, the effects of consumer attitudes, product prices and some other variables on the factors affecting consumption of fresh red meat are examined. A 58-item questionnaire measuring Behavior and Behavioral Intention was applied to 455 consumers in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. In the study, participants' consumption of fresh red meat and white meat was examined together. In the analysis of the data, correlation, independent samples' t-test and One Way Anova was used together with Path Analysis which is a Structural Equation Model technique. Price increases have a negative impact on fresh meat consumption and the effect on consumption of red meat is much higher. The Structural Model explains 80 % of the Behavioral Intention variance and 87 % of the Behavioral variance. In consumers' Behavior and Behavioral Intention in meat consumption Attitude, Perceived Behavioral Control and Price variable have a significant influence, while the effect of Subjective Norms on a lower level. Socioeconomic and demographic variables cause significant differences in fresh meat consumption. Reducing the increases in input prices, which is the most important source of the increase in red meat prices in Turkey, in the short and medium terms, and supporting the supply increases by sustaining its implementation in the medium and long terms should be adopted as basic policies.
Keywords: consumer price, red and white meat, demographic variables, the theory of planned behavior
Published: October 29, 2018 Show citation
References
- AJZEN, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179-211. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Go to original source...
- AJZEN, I. 2005. Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. 2nd Edition. Milton-Keynes, England: McGraw-Hill, Open University Press.
- AJZEN, I. and FISHBEIN, M. 2005. The influence of attitudes on behavior. In: D. ALBARRACÍN, D., JOHNSON, B. T. and ZANNA, M. P. (Eds.). The Handbook of Attitudes. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.173-221.
- AJZEN, I. 2006. Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Universität Bielefeld. [Online]. Available at: http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/ikg/zick/ajzenconstructionatpbquestionnaire.pdf [Accessed: 2017, March 15].
- AJZEN, I. 2011. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9): 1113-1127. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
Go to original source...
- AKBAY, C., BOZ, I. and CHERN, W. S. 2007. Household food consumption in Turkey. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 34(2): 2009-231. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbm011
Go to original source...
- ALBISU, L. M., GRACIA, A. and SANJUÁN, I. 2011. Demographics and Food Consumption: Empirical Evidence. In: LUSK, J. L., ROOSEN, J. and SHOGREN, J. F. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Food Consumption and Policy. Oxford University Press.
Go to original source...
- ALTUNTAª, B. and DOĞAN, H. G. 2017. Determination the poultry meat consumption habits and the factors affecting purchasing decision of households in Kirºehir Province (Turkey). Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 34(2): 20-28. DOI: 10.13002/jafag1143
Go to original source...
- ARAL, Y., AYDIN, E., DEMIR, P., AKIN, A. C., CEVGER, Y., KAYA KUYULU, Ç. Y. and ARIKAN, M. S. 2013. Consumer preferences and consumption situation of chicken meat in Ankara Province, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 37: 582-587. DOI: 10.3906/vet-1210-36
Go to original source...
- ARMAGAN, G. and AKBAY, C. 2008. An econometric analysis of urban households' animal products consumption in Turkey. Applied Economics, 40(15): 2029-2036. DOI: 10.1080/00036840600949256
Go to original source...
- BARREIRA, M. M. and DUARTE, M. F. 1997. An analysis of changes in Portuguese meat consumption. In: WIERENGA, B., VAN TILBURG, A., GRUNERT, K., STEENKAMP, J. B. E.M. and WEDEL, M. (Eds.). Agricultural Marketing and Consumer Behavior in a Changing World. Springer Science + Business Media, pp. 261-273.
Go to original source...
- BERNDSEN, M., and VAN DER PLIGT, J. 2004. Ambivalence towards meat. Appetite, 42(1): 71-78. DOI: 10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00119-3
Go to original source...
- BLAYLOCK, J., SMALLWOOD, D., KASSEL, K., VARIYAM, J. and ALDRICH, L. 1999. Economics, food choices, and nutrition. Food Policy, 24(2-3): 269-286. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-9192(99)00029-9
Go to original source...
- BYRNE, B. M. 2010. Structural equation modelling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications and programming. 2nd Edition. Taylor and Francis Group.
- CARRILLO, E., VARELA, P., SALVADOR, A. and FISZMAN, S. 2011. Main factors underlying consumers' food choice: A first step for the understanding of attitudes toward "healthy eating". Journal of Sensory Studies, 26(2): 85-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2010.00325.x
Go to original source...
- COSGROVE, M., FLYNN, A. and KIELY, M. 2005. Consumption of red meat, white meat and processed meat in Irish adults in relation to dietary quality. British Journal of Nutrition, 93: 933-942. DOI: 10.1079/BJN20051427
Go to original source...
- DELGADO, C., ROSEGRANT, M., STEINFELD, H., EHUI, S. and COURBOIS, C. 1999. Livestock to 2020: The next food revolution. IFPRI Food, Agriculture, and the Environment Discussion Paper 28. Washington, DC. USA: IFPRI. [Online]. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10568/333 [Accessed: 2017, April 02].
- DANIEL, C. R., CROSS, A.J., KOEBNICK, C. and SINHA, R. 2011. Trends in meat consumption in the United States. Public Health Nutrition, 14(4): 575-583. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980010002077
Go to original source...
- DREWNOWSKI, A. and DARMON, N. 2005. Food choices and diet costs: an economic analysis. The Journal of Nutrition, 135(4): 900-904. DOI: 10.1093/jn/135.4.900
Go to original source...
- FAGERLI, R. A. and WANDEL, W. 1999. Gender differences in opinions and practices with regard to a "Healthy Diet". Appetite, 32(2): 171-190. DOI: 10.1006/appe.1998.0188
Go to original source...
- GOLDBERG, J. P. and HELLWIG, J. P. 1997. Nutrition research in the media: the challenge facing scientists. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 16: 544-550.
- GOSSARD, M. H. and YORK, R. 2003. Social structural influences on meat consumption. Human Ecology Review, (10)1: 1-9.
- GRAÇA, J. 2016. Towards an integrated approach to food behaviour: meat consumption and substitution, From Context to Consumers. Psychology, Community & Health, 5(2): 152-169. DOI: 10.5964/pch.v5i2.169
Go to original source...
- GUL, U. and UZUN, B. 2015. Red meat Status and Forecast 2015. Ankara, Turkey: Agricultural Economic and Policy Development Institute, Publication Number 255. [Online]. Available at: http://www.tepge.gov.tr/Dosyalar/Yayinlar/6279a7177c904783906c672ff88d7658.pdf [Accessed: 2017, March 18].
- HAYLEY, A., ZINKIEWICZ, L. and HARDIMAN, K. 2015. Values, attitudes, and frequency of meat consumption. Predicting meat-reduced diet in Australians. Appetite, 84: 98-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.002
Go to original source...
- HIGUCHI, A., DÁVALOS, J. and HERNANI-MERINO, M. 2017. Theory of planned behavior applied to fish consumption in modern Metropolitan Lima. Food Science and Technology, 37(2): 202-208. DOI: 10.1590/1678-457x.17516
Go to original source...
- JIMIN, W., YUE, Z. Z. and COX, R. J. 2005. Animal product consumption in China. Australasian Agribusiness Review, 13: Paper 2.
- KARLI, B., ERTATIS, F., YUKSEL, F., TEKIN, A. and GUL, M. 2017. Determination of red meat consumption habits. The case of Isparta Province. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 17(2): 197-205.
- KUBBERØD, E., UELAND, Ø., TRONSTAD, A. and RISVIK, E. 2002a. Attitudes towards meat and meat-eating among adolescents in Norway: A qualitative study. Appetite, 38: 53-62. DOI: 10.1006/appe.2002.0458
Go to original source...
- KUBBERØD, E., UELAND, Ø., RØDBOTTEN, M., WESTAD, F., and RISVIK, E. 2002b. Gender specific preferences and attitudes towards meat. Food Quality and Preferences, 13(5): 285-294. DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00041-1
Go to original source...
- LEA, E. and WORSLEY, A. 2001. Influences on meat consumption in Australia. Appetite, 36: 127-136. DOI: 10.1006/appe.2000.0386
Go to original source...
- LENNERNÄS, M., FJELLSTRÖM, C., BECKER, W., GIACHETTI, I., SCHMITT, A., WINTER, A. M., and KEARNEY, M. 1997. Influences on food choice perceived to be important by nationally representative samples of adults in the European Union. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 51(Suppl. 2): 51.
- LORCU, F. and BOLAT, B. A. 2012. The analysis of the preferences of the consumption of red meat in the province of Edirne. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 9(1): 71-85.
- MITTERER-DALTOÉ, M. L., CARRILLO, E., QUEIROZ, M. I., FISZMAN, S., and VARELA, P. 2013. Structural equation modelling and word association as tools for a better understanding of low fish consumption. Food Resources International, 52(1): 56-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.048
Go to original source...
- MOD. 2014. The Tenth Development Plan (2014-2018). Special Commission Report (Animal Husbandry). Ministry of Development, Republic of Turkey, Publication Number: KB: 2873 - ÖİK: 723. [Online]. Available at: http://www.mod.gov.tr/Pages/DevelopmentPlans.aspx [Accessed: 2017, April 06].
- OECD/FAO. 2016. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2016-2025. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. [Online]. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5778e.pdf [Accessed: 2017, March 18].
- OECD/FAO. 2014. Agricultural Outlook 2013-2022, Highlights. [Online]. Available at: http://www.agri-outlook.org/highlights-2013-en.pdf [Accessed: 2017, March 12].
- O'NEILL, V., HESS, S. and CAMPBELL, D. 2014. A question of taste: recognizing the role of latent preferences and attitudes in analysing food choices. Food Quality and Preference, 3: 299-310. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.10.003
Go to original source...
- POVEY, R., WELLENS, B. and CONNER, M. 2001. Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian and vegan diets: An examination of the role of ambivalence. Appetite, 37(1): 15-26. DOI: 10.1006/appe.2001.0406
Go to original source...
- ROTHGERBER, H. 2013. Real men don't eat (vegetable) quiche: Masculinity and the justification of meat consumption. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(4): 363-375. DOI: 10.1037/a0030379
Go to original source...
- RUBY, M. B. and HEINE, S. J. 2011. Meat, morals, and masculinity. Appetite, 56(2): 447-450. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.018
Go to original source...
- SABA, A. and DI NATALE, R. 1999. A study on the mediating role of intention in the impact of habit and attitude on meat consumption. Food Quality and Preference, 10: 69-77. DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00039-1
Go to original source...
- SACLI, Y. and OZER, O. O. 2017. Analysis of factors affecting red meat and chicken meat consumption in Turkey using an ideal demand system model. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 54(4): 933-942. DOI: 10.21162/PAKJAS/17.5849
Go to original source...
- SANS, P., and COMBRIS, P. 2015. World meat consumption patterns: An overview of the last fifty years (1961 - 2011). Meat Science, 109: 106-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.05.012
Go to original source...
- SHEPHERD, R. 1999. Social determinants of food choice. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 58(4): 807-812. DOI: 10.1017/S0029665199001093
Go to original source...
- SOBAL, J. and BISOGNI, C. A. 2009. Constructing food choice decisions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 38(Suppl. 1): 37-46. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-009-9124-5
Go to original source...
- TUDORAN, A., OLSEN, S. O. and DOPICO, D. C. 2009. The effect of health benefit information on consumers' health value, attitudes and intentions. Appetite, 52(3): 568-579. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.01.009
Go to original source...
- TUIK. 2017a. Consumer Price Index Database. Turkish Statistical Institute. [Online]. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=653 [Accessed: 2017, March 20].
- TUIK. 2017b. Livestock Statistics Database. Turkish Statistical Institute. [Online]. Available at: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_id=685 [Accessed: 2017, March 21].
- UZMAY, A. and CINAR, G. 2017. Factors affecting the domestic and imported cattle meat consumption probability of consumers in Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 19: 501-510.
- YILDIRIM, I. and CEYLAN, M. 2007. A comparative assessment of urban and rural households' behaviors towards fresh red meat consumption: A case study in Eastern Part of Turkey. Nutrition & Food Science, 37(4): 222-233. DOI: 10.1108/00346650710774596
Go to original source...
- VERBEKE, W. and VACKIER, I. 2005. Individual determinant of fish consumption: application of the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite, 44, 67-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2004.08.006
Go to original source...
- VERMIER, I. and VERBEKE, W. 2008. Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64: 542-553. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007
Go to original source...
- VERSTUYF, J., PATRICK, H., VANSTEENKISTE, M. and TEIXEIRA, P. J. 2012. Motivational dynamics of eating regulation: A self-determination theory perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1): Article 21. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-21
Go to original source...
- WORSLEY, A. and SKRZYPIEC, G. 1998. Do attitudes predict red meat consumption among young people? Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 37: 163-195. DOI: 10.1080/03670244.1998.9991543
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.