Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2018, 66(4), 955-967 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866040955

Conceptual Framework of Family Wineries in the Czech Republic: Results of a Qualitative Research Study

Anastasia Murínová
Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Management, Brno University of Technology, Kolejní 2906/4, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The purpose of research is to understand the current situation and create a conceptual framework of a family business in the wine sector in the Czech Republic. Under this purpose, the following objectives were set: to find out the viability and usefulness of competitive tactics which influence the performance of micro and small family firms in the wine sector. These main competitive tactics have been established theoretically and require further practical confirmation. Another important partial objective was to verify the viability of family influence on the business performance in the framework of the study. Due to the lack of a sufficient theoretical basis in this sector, the author of the article puts the question, which indicators are used by selected firms for each tactic and how these firms percept and measure their performance. The research has a form of pilot study. The collecting of primary data was carried out using face-to-face structured interviews with ten representatives as a typical micro and small family business in the wine sector in the Czech Republic with considered restrictions. Then the content analysis was carried out using coding method and Atlas.ti software. The coded fragments and expressions were subsequently compared among themselves for the identification and interpretation of central categories. This investigation will serve to determine hypotheses in the larger parent study, which will be verified using quantitative methods. This research confirmed the authority of the competitive tactics, familiness and its influence on the business performance; and confirmed ability for practical application in the established reality. Results of the study are useful for both theorists and practitioners.

Keywords: family business, family wineries, competitive tactics, micro and small business
Grants and funding:

This paper was supported by project "Výzvy řízení a fungování podniku v kontextu současného podnikatelského prostředí" [FP-S-18-5395].

Published: August 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Murínová, A. (2018). Conceptual Framework of Family Wineries in the Czech Republic: Results of a Qualitative Research Study. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis66(4), 955-967. doi: 10.11118/actaun201866040955
Download citation

References

  1. ARONOFF, C. E. and WARD, J. L. 2011. Family meetings: How to build a stronger family and a stronger business, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. BERGER, R. 2009. Review: Ann Lewins & Christina Silver (2007). Using Software in Qualitative Research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research: 10(1).
  3. BRENOVA. 2015. 32. Průzkum AMSP ČR (Asociace malých a středních podniků a živnostníků České republiky) - Rodinné firmy. [Online]. Available at: http://amsp.cz/32-pruzkum-amsp-cr-rodinne-firmy/ [Accessed: 2017 December, 10].
  4. BOTERO, I. C., GOMEZ BETANCOURT, G., BETANCOURT RAMIREZ, J. B., and LOPEZ VERGARA, M. P. 2015. Family protocols as governance tools. Journal of Family Business Management, 5(2): 218-237. DOI: 10.1108/JFBM-01-2015-0001 Go to original source...
  5. CASTILLO-APRAIZ, J. and MATEY, J. 2015. Effect of competitive tactics on performance: The case of the pharmaceutical industry. In: Proceedings of Twente University, 2nd International Symposium on Partial Least Squares Path Modeling - The Conference for PLS Users. Twente University of Seville, 16 - 19 June, Spain. Available at: https://goo.gl/ZB4bzG. [Accessed: 2016, October 16]. Go to original source...
  6. CHEZURIANA, J. M. and MOHAMED, R. 2011. Performance Measurement System (PMS) in Small Medium Enterprises (SMES): A Practical Modified Framework. World Journal of Social Sciences. 1(3): 200-212.
  7. CHRISMAN, J. J., CHUA, J. H., PEARSON, A. W., et al. 2012. Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2): 267-293. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00407.x Go to original source...
  8. CHRISTOFI, M., LEONIDOU, E. and VRONTIS, D. 2015. Cause-related marketing, product innovation and extraordinary sustainable leadership: the root towards sustainability. Glob. Bus. Econ. Rev., 17(1): 93-111. DOI: 10.1504/GBER.2015.066533 Go to original source...
  9. CONNELLY, L. M. 2008. Pilot studies. Medsurg nursing: official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses, 17(6): 411-412.
  10. DE MASSIS, A., KOTLAR, J., CAMPOPIANO, G. and CASSIA, L. 2013. Dispersion of family ownership and the performance of small-to-medium size private family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(3): 166-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.05.001 Go to original source...
  11. FIORE, M. et al. 2017. Understanding the relationship between green approach and marketing innovations tools in the wine sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(P4): 4085-4091. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.026 Go to original source...
  12. HERNÁNDEZ-LINARES, R., SARKAR, S. and COBO, M., 2018. Inspecting the Achilles heel: a quantitative analysis of 50 years of family business definitions. Scientometrics, 115(2), 929-951. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2702-1 Go to original source...
  13. HERTZOG, M. A. 2008. Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(2): 180-191. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20247 Go to original source...
  14. HESKOVÁ, M. and VOJTKO, V. 2008. Rodinné firmy: zdroj regionálního rozvoje, Zeleneč: Profess Consulting.
  15. HILL, R. 1998. What sample size is "enough" in internet survey research? Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 6(3-4).
  16. HORNUNGOVÁ, J., and MILICHOVSKÝ, F. 2013. Profit indicators in performance systems in the Czech companies. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(2): 345-352. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361020345 Go to original source...
  17. ISAAC, S., and MICHAEL, W. B. 1995. Handbook in research and evaluation. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
  18. JANKU, M. and MAREK, K. 2016. Family Enterprise in Czech Civil Code. EU agrarian Law, 5(2): 25-32. DOI: 10.1515/eual-2016-0009 Go to original source...
  19. JULIOUS, S. A. 2005. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 4(4): 287-291. DOI: 10.1002/pst.185 Go to original source...
  20. KAMSU-FOGUEM, B. and FLAMMANG, A. 2014. Knowledge description for the suitability requirements of different geographical regions for growing wine. Land Use Policy, 38: 719-731. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.018 Go to original source...
  21. KLEIN, S. B., ASTRACHAN, J. H. and SMYRNIOS, K. X. 2005. The F-PEC Scale of Family Influence: Construction, Validation, and Further Implication for Theory. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(3): 321-339. Go to original source...
  22. KORÁB, V., HANZELKOVÁ, A. and MIHALISKO, M. 2008. Rodinné podnikání: způsoby financování rodinných firem, řízení rodinných podniků, úspěšné předání následnictví. Brno: Computer Press.
  23. LING, Y., and KELLERMANNS, F. W. 2010. The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: The moderating role of information exchange frequency. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2): 322-344. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00893.x Go to original source...
  24. LOMBARDI, P, DAL BIANCO, A., FREDA, R., CARACCIOLO, F. and CEMBALO, L. 2016. Development and trade competitiveness of the European wine sector: A gravity analysis of intra-EU flows. Wine Economics and Policy, 5(1): 50-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.wep.2015.12.002 Go to original source...
  25. LÓPEZ-GUZMÁN, T., RODRÍGUEZ-GARCÍA, J., SÁNCHEZ-CAÑIZARES, S. and JOSÉ LUJÁN-GARCÍA, M. 2011. The development of wine tourism in Spain. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 23(4): 374-386. DOI: 10.1108/17511061111186523 Go to original source...
  26. MARTIN-REYNA, J. M., and DURAN-ENCALADA, J. A. 2012. The relationship among family business, corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from the Mexican stock exchange. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(2): 106-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.03.001 Go to original source...
  27. MASON, M. C., GOS, L. and RAGGIOTTO, F. 2016. Entrepreneurial orientation, agglomeration, networks and firms' performance - Empirical evidence from the Italian wine sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 20(1): 100-128.
  28. MAZZI, C., 2011. Family business and financial performance: Current state of knowledge and future research challenges. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(3): 166-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.07.001 Go to original source...
  29. MAZZOLA, P., SCIASCIA, S. and KELLERMANNS, F. 2013. Non-linear effects of family sources of power on performance. Journal of Business Research, 66(4): 568. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.01.005 Go to original source...
  30. MILLER, D., LE BRETON-MILLER, I., LESTER, R. H., and CANNELLA, A. A. 2007. Are family firms really superior performers?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5): 829-858. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004 Go to original source...
  31. MURÍNOVÁ, A. 2017. Wine Marketing: The Case of Micro and Small Wine Companies in the Czech Republic. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference Innovation Management, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (IMES 2017). 25-26 May. Prague: University of Economics. Oeconomica Publishing House, 5, pp. 641-653.
  32. MURINOVA, A. 2017. Family Relationships and its Influence on Family Wine Firms in the Czech Republic. Trendy Ekonomiky a Managementu, 11(29): 51-58. Go to original source...
  33. PETLINA, A. 2016. Key Principals of Family Business Comprehension with Help of the Historical Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference "Innovation Management, Enterpreneurship and Corporate Sustainability", (4): 557-570.
  34. ROZBROJ, D. 2014. Situační a Výhledová Zpráva. Réva Vinná a Víno. Praha: Ministerstvo Zemědelství. Available at: http://eagri.cz/public/web/file/433552/SVZ_Vino_2015.pdf [Accessed: 2017, December 10].
  35. SIMPSON, M., PADMORE, J. and NEWMAN, N. 2012. Towards a new model of success and performance in SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18(3): 264-285. DOI: 10.1108/13552551211227675 Go to original source...
  36. RICHARD, P. J., DEVINNEY, T. M. and JOHNSON, G. 2009. Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice, Journal of Management, 35(3): 718-804. DOI: 10.1177/0149206308330560 Go to original source...
  37. ŠPERKOVÁ, R., and HEJMALOVÁ, H. 2012. Intensity of rivalry among existing competitors in the wine-making branch. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun., 60(2): 429-436. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260020429 Go to original source...
  38. SIMPSON, M., PADMORE, J. and NEWMAN, N. 2012. Towards a New Model of Success and Performance in SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18(3): 264-285. DOI: 10.1108/13552551211227675 Go to original source...
  39. LAEVAERT, C. 2016. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMES). Eurostat: Your key to European statistics. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/structural-business-statistics/structural-business-statistics/sme [Accessed: 2016, December 17].
  40. SOLER, I. P., GEMAR, G. and GUERRERO-MURILLO, R. 2017. Family and Non-family Business Behaviour in the Wine Sector: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Family Business, 7(1 - 2): 65-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.11.001 Go to original source...
  41. SVOBODOVÁ, I., VĚŽNÍK A., and KRÁL, M.,2014. Viticulture in the Czech Republic: Some Spatio-Temporal Trends. Moravian Geographical Reports, 22(1): 2-14. DOI: 10.2478/mgr-2014-0001 Go to original source...
  42. VALLONE, C. 2013. Contribution on Family Business Definition. In: The Firm's Role in the Economy: Does a Growth - Oriented Business Model Exist? In: Proceedings of the 36th AIDEA Conference. Bari: Cacucci. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10281/46789 [Accessed: 2017, June 30].
  43. VAN BELLE, G. 2002. Statistical rules of thumb. New York: John Wiley.
  44. YU, Y. and LINDSAY, V. 2016. Export Commitment and the Global Financial Crisis: Perspectives from the New Zealand Wine Industry. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2): 771-797. DOI: 10.1111/jsbm.12171 Go to original source...
  45. WIECEK-JANKA, E., MIERZWIAK, R. and KIJEWSKA, J. 2016. Competencies' Model in the Succession Process of Family Firms with the Use of Grey Clustering Analysis. Journal of Grey System, 28(2): 121-131. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.