Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2018, 66(4), 871-881 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866040871

Genotypic Differences in Root System Size in White Mustard in Relation to Biomass Yield and Soil Nitrogen Content

Martin Hajzler, Jana Klimešová, Petra Procházková, Tomáš Středa
Department of Crop Science, Breeding and Plant Medicine, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Growing catch crops is one of the possible strategies to decrease erosion and nitrogen loss from soil profiles. Biomass yield and root system size have significant impacts on the soil nitrogen content. a three-year field experiment with eight varieties of white mustard (Sinapis alba L.) was established to evaluate the effects of genotype and environment on biomass yield, soil nitrogen content and rooting parameters. Significant effects of genotype were found for root length density (RLD), root surface density (RSD) and specific root length (SRL) in the plow layer (0-20 cm) and for root system size (RSS), measured by electrical capacitance method, during three phenological phases. Higher biomass yield in varieties with higher RLD and RSD values during ripening and a larger RSS during flowering were found in dry conditions. Relationship of the root system and biomass yield to nitrate and ammonia nitrogen content varied in different environments. We found a significant relation between the RSS and ammonia nitrogen content in more fertile environment on average over the three years. The nitrate nitrogen content was related to the RLD, RSD and SRL in favorable year at shallow soil depths (0-20 cm).

Keywords: catch crop, drought, root length density, root biomass, Sinapis alba, soil nitrogen
Grants and funding:

This work was supported by project QJ1510098 of the National Agency for Agricultural Research and by the project IP 1/2017 of the Internal Grant Agency IGA of Mendel University in Brno.

Published: August 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hajzler, M., Klimešová, J., Procházková, P., & Středa, T. (2018). Genotypic Differences in Root System Size in White Mustard in Relation to Biomass Yield and Soil Nitrogen Content. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(4), 871-881. doi: 10.11118/actaun201866040871
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ARONSSON, H., HANSEN, E. M., THOMSEN, I. K., LIU, J., ØGAARD, A. F., KÄNKÄNEN, H. and ULÉN, B. 2016. The ability of cover crops to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus losses from arable land in southern Scandinavia and Finland. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 71(1): 41-55. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.71.1.41 Go to original source...
    2. AZIZ, M. M., PALTA, J. A., SIDDIQUE, K. H. M. and SADRAS, V. O. 2016. Five decades of selection for yield reduced root length density and increased nitrogen uptake per unit root length in Australian wheat varieties. Plant and Soil, 413: 181-192. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-016-3059-y Go to original source...
    3. BLUM, A. 2011. Plant Breeding for Water-Limited Environments. New York: Springer. Go to original source...
    4. BODNER, G., HIMMELBAUER, M., LOISKANDL, W. and KAUL, H. P. 2010. Improved evaluation of cover crop species by growth and root factors. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30(2): 455-464. DOI: 10.1051/agro/2009029 Go to original source...
    5. BODNER, G., LOISKANDL, W. and KAUL, H. P. 2007. Cover crop evapotranspiration under semi-arid conditions using FAO dual crop coefficient method with water stress compensation. Agricultural water management, 93: 85-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.06.010 Go to original source...
    6. BOWSHER, A. W., MASON, C. M., GOOLSBY, E. W. and DONOVAN, L. A. 2016. Fine root tradeoffs between nitrogen concentration and xylem vessel traits preclude unified whole-plant resource strategies in Helianthus. Ecology and Evolution, 6(4): 1016-1031. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1947 Go to original source...
    7. CHLOUPEK, O. 1972. The relationship between electric capacitance and some other parameters of plant roots. Biologia Plantarum, 14(3): 227-230. DOI: 10.1007/BF02921255 Go to original source...
    8. CHLOUPEK, O. 1976. Evaluation of root system of mustard plants based on dielectric properties and with respect to final yield. [in German: Die Bewertung des Wurzelsystems von Senfpflanzen auf Grund der dielektrischen Eigenschaften und mit Rücksicht auf den Endertrag]. Biologia Plantarum, 18(1): 44-49. DOI: 10.1007/BF02922333 Go to original source...
    9. CHLOUPEK, O., FORSTER, B. P. and THOMAS, W. T. 2006. The effect of semi-dwarf genes on root system size in field-grown barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 112(5): 779-786. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-005-0147-4 Go to original source...
    10. CHLOUPEK, O., DOSTÁL, V., STŘEDA, T., PSOTA, V. and DVOŘÁČKOVÁ, O. 2010. Drought tolerance of barley varieties in relation to their root system size. Plant Breeding, 129(6): 630-636. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01801.x Go to original source...
    11. CSERESNYÉS, I., RAJKAI, K. and TAKÁCS, T. 2016. Indirect monitoring of root activity in soybean cultivars under contrasting moisture regimes by measuring electrical capacitance. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 38(5): 121. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-016-2149-z Go to original source...
    12. DELGADO, J. A. 2002. Quantifying the loss mechanisms of nitrogen. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 57(6): 389-398.
    13. ELAZAB, A., SERRET, M. D. and ARAUS, J. L. 2016. Interactive effect of water and nitrogen regimes on plant growth, root traits and water status of old and modern durum wheat genotypes. Planta, 244(1): 125-144. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-016-2500-z Go to original source...
    14. FAROOQ, M., WAHID, A., KOBAYASHI, N., FUJITA, D. and BASRA, S. M. A. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(1): 185-212. DOI: 10.1051/agro:2008021 Go to original source...
    15. FENG, G., ZHANG, Y., CHEN, Y., LI, Q., CHEN, F., GAO, Q. and MI, G. 2016. Effects of nitrogen application on root length and grain yield of rain-fed maize under different soil types. Agronomy Journal, 108: 1-10. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2015.0367 Go to original source...
    16. FOLEY, M. 1999. Genetic approach to the development of cover crops for weed management. Journal of Crop Production, 4(2): 77-93. DOI: 10.1300/J144v02n01_05 Go to original source...
    17. FRANCIS, G. S., BARTLEY, K. M. and TABLEY, F. J. 1998. The effect of winter cover crop management on nitrate leaching losses and crop growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, 131(3): 299-308. DOI: 10.1017/S0021859698005899 Go to original source...
    18. HERRERA, J. M., FEIL, B., STAMP, P. and LIEDGENS, M. 2010. Root growth and nitrate-nitrogen leaching of catch crops following spring wheat. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39(3): 845-854. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2009.0306 Go to original source...
    19. HIMMELBAUER, M. L., MAJERCKA, J., RODNY, M., NOVÁK, V. and LOISKANDL, W. 2013. The impact of root data details on modelling of soil water transport in soil-plant-atmosphere system. Acta Hydrologica Slovaca, 14: 21-31.
    20. KAYE, J. P. and QUEMADA, M. 2017. Using cover crops to mitigate and adapt to climate change. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37: 4. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-016-0410-x Go to original source...
    21. KOŽNAROVÁ, V. and KLABZUBA, J. 2002. Recommendation of World Meteorological Organization to describing meteorological or climatological conditions. Rostlinná výroba, 48(4): 190-192. Go to original source...
    22. KRISTENSEN, H. L. and THORUP-KRISTENSEN, K. 2004. Root growth and nitrate uptake of three different catch crops in deep soil layers. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68: 529-537. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2004.5290 Go to original source...
    23. MEISINGER, J. J., HARGROVE, W. L., MIKKELSEN, R. L., WILLIAMS, J. R. and BENSON, V. W. 1991. Effects of cover crops on groundwater quality. In: HARGROVE, W. L. (Ed.). Cover crops for clean water. Ankeny: Soil and Water Conservation Society, pp. 57-68.
    24. NAKHFOROOSH, A., GRAUSGRUBER, H., KAUL, H. P. and BODNER, G. 2014. Wheat root diversity and root functional characterization. Plant and Soil, 380: 211-229. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-014-2082-0 Go to original source...
    25. PALTA, J. and WATT, M. 2009. Vigorous crop root systems: Form and function for improving the capture of water and nutrients. In: SADRAS, V. and CALDERINI, D. (Eds.). Crop Physiology, Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy. Burlington: Academic Press, pp. 309-325. Go to original source...
    26. POSTIC, F. and DOUSSAN, C. 2016. Benchmarking electrical methods for rapid estimation of root biomass. Plant Methods, 12: 33. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-016-0133-7 Go to original source...
    27. STŘEDA, T., DOSTÁL, V. and ULLMANNOVÁ, K. 2009. Root system as a factor of oilseed rape yield formation, In: MendelNet'09 Agro - Proceedings of International Ph.D. Students Conference. Mendel University in Brno, 25. November. Brno: Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, pp.141-146.
    28. SVAČINA, P., STŘEDA, T. and CHLOUPEK, O. 2014. Uncommon selection by root system size increases barley yield. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34:545-551. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-013-0160-y Go to original source...
    29. THOMSEN, I. K. and HANSEN, E. M. 2014. Cover crop growth and impact on N leaching as affected by pre- and postharvest sowing and time of incorporation. Soil Use and Management, 30(1): 48-57. DOI: 10.1111/sum.12083 Go to original source...
    30. THORUP-KRISTENSEN, K. 2001. Are differences in root growth of nitrogen catch crops important for their ability to reduce soil nitrate-N content, and how can this be measured? Plant and Soil, 230(2): 185-195. DOI: 10.1023/A:1010306425468 Go to original source...
    31. THORUP-KRISTENSEN, K. and RASMUSSEN, C. R. 2015. Identifying new deep-rooted plant species suitable as undersown nitrogen catch crops. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 70(6): 399-409. DOI: 10.2489/jswc.70.6.399 Go to original source...
    32. VOS, J. and VAN DER PUTTEN, P. E. L. 1997. Field observations on nitrogen catch crops. I. Potential and actual growth and nitrogen accumulation in relation to sowing date and crop species. Plant and Soil, 195(2): 299-309. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004281218996 Go to original source...
    33. WANG, CH., LIU, W., LI, Q., MA, D., LU, H., FENG, W., XIE, X., ZHU, Y. and GUO, T. 2014. Effects of different irrigation and nitrogen regimes on root growth and its correlation with above-ground plant parts in high-yielding wheat under field conditions. Field Crops Research, 16: 138-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.04.011 Go to original source...
    34. WENDLING, M., BÜCHI, L., AMOSSÉ, C., SINAJ, S., WALTER, A. and CHARLES, R. 2016. Influence of root and leaf traits on the uptake of nutrients in cover crops. Plant and Soil, 409(1-2): 419-434. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-016-2974-2 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content