Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2018, 66(3), 755-766 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866030755

Evaluation Structure of Local Public Expenditures in the European Union Countries

Martina Halásková1, Renata Halásková2
1 Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics, V©B - Technical University of Ostrava, Sokolská třída 33, 702 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
2 Department of Technology and Vocational Education, Faculty of Education, University of Ostrava, Fráni ©rámka 3, 709 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic

The public sector plays a significant role in securing public needs in a number of countries. The paper aims to evaluate the local public sector by the structure of local public expenditures, emphasizing similarities and differences in EU countries. Attention is paid to the evaluation of local public expenditures by eight functions (general public services, public order and safety, economic affairs, housing and community amenities, recreation and culture, social protection, health, education) in years 2005 and 2015. Local public expenditures by function in the EU are evaluated in connection to lower government levels and fiscal decentralization of expenditures. The evaluation shows that no countries demonstrate similarity of local public expenditures by function, which is associated also with an identical size of fiscal decentralization of expenditures and the number of lower government levels. By contrast, both similarities and differences were proved with respect to the evaluated local public expenditures by the application of multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis. The results have shown that Scandinavian countries represent the most marked differences in the structure of local public expenditures, in comparison to Malta and Cyprus in terms of local public expenditures on social protection, health and education.

Keywords: public finance, public expenditure, local public expenditure by function, evaluation, EU countries, multidimensional scaling, cluster analysis
Grants and funding:

This paper was supported within Operational Programme Education for Competitiveness (Project No. CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0296).

Published: June 28, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Halásková, M., & Halásková, R. (2018). Evaluation Structure of Local Public Expenditures in the European Union Countries. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis66(3), 755-766. doi: 10.11118/actaun201866030755
Download citation

References

  1. AFONSO, A. and FURCERI, D. 2008. Government Size, Composition, Volatility and Economic Growth. ECB Working Paper No. 849. Frankfurt: European Central Bank. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp849.pdf?aab7f080823ee347542c6577421398e5 [Accessed: 2018, January 12].
  2. ARISTOVNIK, A. 2012. Fiscal Decentralization in Eastern Europe: Trends and Selected Issues. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 37E: 5-22. Go to original source...
  3. ASHWORTH, J., GALLI, E. and PADOVANO, F. 2009. Government Decentralization and Public Spending Programs. Pavia: University Pavia. [Online]. Available at: http://www.siepweb.it/siep/oldDoc/2009/200904.pdf [Accessed: 2018, January 10].
  4. BLÖCHLIGER, H. and VAMMALLE, C. 2012. Reforming Fiscal Federalism and Local Government: Beyond the Zero-Sum Game. OECD, Fiscal Federalism Studies. [Online]. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/tax/reforming-fiscal-federalism-and-local-government-9789264119970-en.htm [Accessed: 2017, December 12].
  5. BOADWAY, R. and SHAH, A. 2009. Fiscal Federalism: Principles and Practice of Multiorder Governance. 1st Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  6. BROWN, C. V. and JACKSON, P. M. 1990. Public Sector Economics. 4th Edition. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
  7. CASSETTE, A. and PATY, S. 2010. Fiscal decentralization and the size of government: a European country empirical analysis. Public Choice, 143(1-2): 173-189. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-009-9496-x Go to original source...
  8. CONNOLLY, J. M. and MASON, D. P. 2016. Ideology and Local Public Expenditure Priorities. Political Research Quarterly, 69(4): 830-841. DOI: 10.1177/1065912916665702 Go to original source...
  9. DAFFLON, B. 2002. Local Public Finance in Europe: Balancing the Budget and Controlling Debt (Studies in Fiscal Federalism and State-Local Finance Series). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  10. DEXIA - CEMR. 2012. Sub-national Public Finance in the European Union. Brussels: Dexia & Council of European Municipalities and Region.
  11. EBEL, R. D. and YILMAZ, S. 2002. On the Measurement and Impact of Fiscal Decentralisation. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2809. Washington: World Bank. [Online]. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/14821 [Accessed: 2018, January 10].
  12. ERSOZ, F. and BAYRAK, L. 2008. Comparing of Welfare indicators between Turkey and European Union Member States. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 9(2): 92-98.
  13. EUROSTAT. 2017. General government expenditure by function (COFOG). Eurostat. [Online]. Available at: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=gov_10a_exp〈=en [Accessed: 2018, January 11].
  14. EVERITT, B., LANDAU, S., LEESE, M. et al. 2011. Cluster Analysis. 5th Edition. London: John Wiley & Sons. Go to original source...
  15. FERREIRO, J., GARCIA-DEL-VALLE, M. T. and GOMEZ, C. 2013. An Analysis of the Convergence of the Composition of Public Expenditures in European Union Countries. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 72(4): 799-825. DOI: 10.1111/ajes.12028 Go to original source...
  16. FROSSATI, A. and PANELLA, G. 1999. Fiscal Federalism in the European union. London: Routledge.
  17. HALASKOVA, M. and HALASKOVA, R. 2017a. Public Expenditures in Areas of Public Sector: Analysis and Evaluation in EU Countries. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice - Series D, 24(39): 39-50.
  18. HALASKOVA, R. and HALASKOVA, M. 2017b. Local Governments in EU Countries: Competences and Financing of Public Services. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice - Series D, 24(40): 49-60.
  19. HENDL, J. 2012. Overview of statistical data processing methods: data analysis and meta-analysis [in Czech: Přehled statistických metod zpracování dat: Analýza a metaanalýza dat]. 4th Edition. Praha: Portál.
  20. HINAREJOS, A. 2013. Fiscal Federalism in the European Union: Evolution and Future Choices for EMU. Common Market Law Review, 50(6). 1621-1642. [Online]. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2363069 [Accessed: 2018, January 5]. Go to original source...
  21. JIN, J. and ZOU, H. 2002. How Does Fiscal Decentralization Affect Aggregate, National, and Subnational Government Size? Journal of Urban Economics, 52(2): 270-293. DOI: 10.1016/S0094-1190(02)00004-9 Go to original source...
  22. KOPAŃSKA, A. 2017. Local governments' revenue and expenditure autonomy as a determinant of local public spending on culture. An analysis for Polish rural municipalities. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(1): 222-233. DOI: 10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p222-233 Go to original source...
  23. MACHADO, J. T. and MATA, M. E. 2015. Analysis of World Economic Variables Using Multidimensional Scaling. PLoS ONE, 10(3): e0121277. [Online]. Available at: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0121277 [Accessed: 2018, January 15]. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121277 Go to original source...
  24. MUSGRAVE, R. A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance: A study in Public Economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  25. OATES, W. E. 1999. An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3): 1120-1149. DOI: 10.1257/jel.37.3.1120 Go to original source...
  26. OPLOTNIK, Z. J. and FIN®GAR, M. 2013. EU Member States and Fiscal Decentralization- Empirical Comparison. Innovative Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences, 6(3): 39-64. DOI: 10.12959/issn.1855-0541.IIASS-2013-no3-art03 Go to original source...
  27. PENCH, L. and GOVERNATORI, M. 2012. European economy. The Quality of Public Expenditures in the EU. Occasional Papers 125. Brussels/Luxembourg: European Commission [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/occasional_paper/2012/pdf/ocp125_en.pdf [Accessed: 2018, January 2].
  28. RODRÍGUEZ-POSE, A. and KRØIJER, A. 2009. Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe. Growth and Change, 40(3): 387-417. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2009.00488.x Go to original source...
  29. RODDEN, J. 2003. Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal Federalism and the Growth of Government. International Organization, 57(4): 695-729. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818303574021 Go to original source...
  30. RUSU (CIGU), E. and PETRIȘOR, M. B. 2016. Overviewing the Expenditures Structure in Local Self-Government Entities. EIRP Proceedings, 11: 363-369.
  31. SACCHI, A. and SALOTTI, S. 2016. A Comprehensive Analysis of Expenditure Decentralization and of the Composition of Local Public Spending. Regional Studies, 50(1): 93-109. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.893387 Go to original source...
  32. SAMUELSON, P. A. 1954. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4): 387-389. DOI: 10.2307/1925895 Go to original source...
  33. SEVIC, Z. 2008. Local Public Finance in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham/ Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. Go to original source...
  34. SHELTON, C. A. 2007. The Size and Composition of Government Expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 91(11-12): 2230-2260. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.01.003 Go to original source...
  35. SOW, M. and RAZAFIMAHEFA, I. F. 2015. Fiscal Decentralization and the Efficiency of Public Service Delivery. IMF Working Paper WP/15/59. Washington: International Monetary Fund. [Online]. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp1559.pdf [Accessed: 2017, December 22]. Go to original source...
  36. STIGLITZ, J. E. 1988. Economics of the Public sector. 2th Edition. London: Norton&Company.
  37. SZAROWSKA, I. 2011. Relationship between government spending and economic growth in the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59(7): 415-422. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070415 Go to original source...
  38. TIEBOUT, CH. M. 1956. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5): 416-424. DOI: 10.1086/257839 Go to original source...
  39. TUKEY, J. W. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  40. VANEECLOO, C., BADRIOTTI, A. and FORNASINI, M. 2007. Fiscal federalism in the European Union and its countries: a confrontation between theories and facts. Brussels: P. I. E. and Oxford: Peter Lang.
  41. VÄRJA, E. 2016. Local public expenditure: Equality, quality and growth. Örebro Studies in Economics 33. Örebro University. [Online]. Available at: https://oru.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:958289/FULLTEXT01.pdf [Accessed: 2017, September 5].
  42. ZÁRSKA, E. and RAFAJ, O. 2017. Development of cities and its financing. Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice - Series D, 24(41): 257-267.
  43. ZIMMERMANN, H. 2004. Local Public Finance in Europe. Balancing the Budget and Controlling Debt. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4): 473-474. DOI: 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh022 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.