Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2018, 66(3), 747-754 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866030747
CFEBT Risk Triangle as a Tool for Detecting and Evaluating Risks of Accounting Records: a Case Study
- Department of Finance and Accounting, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
The objective of the present contribution is to evaluate the risk of accounting errors and frauds in small companies predominantly operating in agriculture. It is based on an analysis of the CFEBT risk triangle for financial statements reported for the years 2012-2016.
The CFEBT risk triangle is applied in form of a case study aimed at risk detection of occurrence of accounting errors and frauds for a selected sample of companies. A detailed analysis of a risk of impact of accounting errors and frauds is illustrated in the case study of an accounting unit chosen from the sample of companies evaluated. Results of the presented case study into the detection and evaluation of the risk based on interconnections between the reported profit (loss) and the generated cash flow during 5 accounting periods confirm the significance of having a complex view for decision-making of users based on reported accounting records and accounting data.
Future research into the CFEBT risk triangle focuses on performance of complex analyses for individual types of business activities of small and middle-sized companies in the context of Czech accounting standards and IFRS.
Keywords: creative accounting, CFEBT risk triangle of accounting errors and frauds, financial statements, risk of financial statements, fair and true view, frauds, accounting errors
Grants and funding:
This paper was supported by the University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Economics [no. IGS05C1].
Published: June 28, 2018 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- BALACIU, D. E., BOGDAN, V., FELEDA, L. and POPA, A. L. 2014. Accounting Outside the Box. An Introspective Study on the Colorful Mind of Managers Reflected in Creative Accounting. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference Accounting and Management Information Systems, Bucharest Univ Economic Studies, pp. 197-214.
- BOLTON, R. J. and HAND, D. J. 2002. Statistical fraud detection: A review. Statistical Science, 17(3): 235-249.
Go to original source...
- BRODY, R. G., MELENDY, S. R. and PERRI, F. S. 2012. Commentary from the American Accounting Association's 2011 Annual Meeting Panel on Emerging Issues in Fraud Research. Accounting Horizons, 26(3): 513-531. DOI: 10.2308/acch-50175
Go to original source...
- CAPLAN, D. 1999. Internal controls and the detection of management fraud. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1): 101-117. DOI: 10.2307/2491398
Go to original source...
- CIMA. 2009. Fraud Risk Management: A Guide to Good Practice. UK: Chartered Global Management Accountant. Available from: http://www.cimaglobal.com/documents/importeddocuments/cidtechguide_fraud_risk_management_feb09.pdf [Accessed 25 November 2017].
- DAWSON, S. 2015. Internal Control/Anti-Fraud Program Design for The Small Business. UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Go to original source...
- DRABKOVA, Z. 2015. Analysis of possibilities of detecting the manipulation of financial statements in terms of the IFRS and Czech accounting standards. Acta universitatis agriculturae et silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(6): 1859-1866. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563061859
Go to original source...
- DRABKOVA, Z. 2016. Models of detection of manipulated financial statements as part of the internal control system of the entity. ACRN Oxford Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives Special Issue of Finance Risk and Accounting Perspectives, 5(1): 227-235.
- DRABKOVA, Z. 2017. Fraud Risk Management - An Effective Anti-Fraud System and Decision-Making Tool for Users of Financial Statements. Česko: Tribun EU.
- FREE, C. 2015. Looking through the fraud triangle: a review and call for new directions. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(2): 175-196. DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-02-2015-0009
Go to original source...
- HENSELMANN, K. and HOFMANN, S. 2010. Accounting Fraud: Case Studies and Practical Implications. Germany: Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co.
Go to original source...
- GOODE, S. and LACEY, D. 2011. Detecting complex account fraud in the enterprise: The role of technical and non-technical controls. Decision Support Systems, 50(4): 702-714. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.018
Go to original source...
- JONES, M. 2011. Creative accounting, Fraud and International accounting scandals. UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Go to original source...
- MUI, G. and MALLEY, J. 2015. A tale of two triangles: comparing the Fraud Triangle with criminology's Crime Triangle. Accounting Research Journal, 28(1): 45-58. DOI: 10.1108/ARJ-10-2014-0092
Go to original source...
- PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS. 2014. Global Economic Crime Survey 2014. Price Water house Coopers. Available from: http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/economic-crime-survey/ [Accessed 25 November 2017].
- SCHUCHTER, A. and LEVI, M. 2015. Beyond the fraud triangle: Swiss and Austrian elite fraudsters. Accounting Forum, 39(3): 176-187. DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2014.12.001
Go to original source...
- SCHUCHTER, A. and LEVI, M. 2016. The Fraud Triangle revisited. Security Journal, 29(2): 107-121. DOI: 10.1057/sj.2013.1
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.