Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2018, 66(1), 263-272 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866010263

Comparison Analysis and Control Procedures of Labor Workforce Efficiency of Milk Processors in Visegrad Group and Russia

Stanislava Kontsevaya1, Jindřich ©pička2, Irina Kharcheva3, Irina Makunina3, Raisa Kostina3
1 Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Kamycka 129, 165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic
2 Department of Strategy, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Economics, Prague, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3, Czech Republic
3 Faculty of Economics and Finance, Russian Timiryazev State Agrarian University, Timiryazevskaya st. 49, 127550, Moscow, Russia

The aim of an article is to make comparison analysis of labor productivity efficiency in milk processing industry. An investigated object is a data base of accounting reports of 5 countries in the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic, Poland, Hungary and Russia over the period of 2011-2013. The number of selected companies is 619. a hypothesis of the research: there is significant correlation between salary and labor productivity in milk processing industry. Difference between Visegrad group and Russia is tested with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test at significance level of 0.05. Representativity of data is checked by Chi-Square test. Relationship between workforce productivity and salary is made by Spearman's rank correlation. In Visegrad group, relationship between workforce productivity and salary are presented by volume of coefficient 0.7189. Russian companies have coefficient 0.1208. Generally speaking, there is sufficiently great dependence between salary and labor productivity in Visegrad group and there is no dependence in Russia. a worker can see no dependence between high salary and high productivity in Russia that is The possible reason of low correlation between salary and labor productivity. This fact suggests methodology to control efficiency of labor workforce. The methodology is based on coefficients, given to each employee, in order to estimate his productivity and compare it with other employees or compare companies between each other.

Keywords: Dairy industry, milk processing, financial analysis, controlling, statistical analysis
Grants and funding:

The article was supported by the institutional support of the University of Economics, Prague, project no. V©E IP300040.

Prepublished online: February 28, 2018; Published: September 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kontsevaya, S., ©pička, J., Kharcheva, I., Makunina, I., & Kostina, R. (2018). Comparison Analysis and Control Procedures of Labor Workforce Efficiency of Milk Processors in Visegrad Group and Russia. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(1), 263-272. doi: 10.11118/actaun201866010263
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ALBOROV, R. A., KONTSEVAYA, S. M. and KONTSEVAYA, S. R. 2014. Improvement of Management Accounting of Farm Labor Inputs and Labor Productivity Estimation Improvement in Agriculture. In: Proceedings of the Russian Scientific Conference. Izhevsk State Agricultural Academy, 6 September. Izhevsk: Izhevsk State Agricultural Academy, pp. 13-20.
    2. BLAUG, M. 1994. Economic thought in retrospect. Moscow: Delo.
    3. BORSKÁ, J. and KADLECOVÁ, E. 2015. Legal Aspects of Agricultural Land in the Czech Republic. In: Proceedings of the Conference Agrarian perspectives XXIIV. Czech University of Life Sciences, 16-18 September. Prague: Czech University of Life Science, 73-81.
    4. CONOVER, W. 1999. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 3rd Editon. New York: Wiley.
    5. FEDERAL STATE STATISTICS SERVICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. 2016. Differentiation of Workers' Wages by Professional Groups. [Online]. Available at: http://www.gks.ru/bgd/regl/B12_04/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d06/3-plat.htm [Accessed: 2016, June 24].
    6. DOHMEN, T., LEHMANN, H. and SCHAFFER, M. 2014. Wage Policies of a Russian Firm and the Financial Crisis of 1998: Evidence from Personnel Data - 1997 to 2002. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 67(2): 504-531. DOI: 10.1177/001979391406700209 Go to original source...
    7. GALKINA, J. 2011. Development of Methods for Assessing the Effectiveness Compensation ff Wage. Modern Economy: Problems, Trends, Perspectives, 4: 91-97.
    8. KLEIN N. 2012. Real Wage, Labor Productivity, and Employment Trends in South Africa: A Closer Look. IMF Working Paper, WP/12/92. International Monetary Fund. Go to original source...
    9. MEAGER, N. and SPECKESSER S. 2011. Wages, productivity and employment: A review of theory and international data. EEO Thematic Report. European Employment Observatory. Institute for Employment Studies.
    10. MILLEA M. 2002. Disentangling the Wage-Productivity Relationship: Evidence from Select OECD Member Countries. International Advances in Economic Research, (8)4: 314-323. DOI: 10.1007/BF02295506 Go to original source...
    11. PASCALAU R. 2007. Productivity Shocks, Unemployment Persistence, and the Adjustment of Real Wages in OECD Countries. MPRA Paper 7222. Go to original source...
    12. PAUL, G. and THIESSEN, V. 2001. Arguing With Numbers Statistics for the Social Sciences. Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.
    13. RASTAMKHANOVA, L. N. 2009. The methodology of internal control and its development in a management consulting. Yoshkar-Ola: String.
    14. RAZGUNE, A. and LAZUTKA, R. 2015. Labor share trends in three Baltic countries: literature review and empirical evidence Ekonomika, 94(1): 98-116. DOI: 10.15388/Ekon.2015.1.5322 Go to original source...
    15. ROYSTON, P. 1992. Approximating the Shapiro-Wilk W-test for non-normality. Statistics and Computing, 2(3): 117-119. DOI: 10.1007/BF01891203 Go to original source...
    16. SHAPIRO C. and STIGLITZ J. 1984. Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device. American Economic Review, 74(3): 433-444.
    17. URBANCOVÁ, H., ČERMÁKOVÁ, H. and NAVRÁTILOV, M. 2015. Human Resource Diversity Management in Selected Czech Agricultural Companies. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 7(3): 79-87. Go to original source...
    18. FAOSTAT. 2017. Data. [Online]. Available at: http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E [Accessed: 2017, September 26].

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content