Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2018, 66(1), 171-182 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201866010171

Public Participation in the Process of EIA Intentions of Wind Power Plants in the Czech Republic

Jiří Schneider, Petr Mudra, Alice Kozumplíková
Department of Environmentalistic and Natural Resources, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, Tř. Generála Píky 2005/7, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic

Public participation in decision-making process is an important function of the process called Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The respect for the public right in the participation of environmental impact assessment and the right to information are generally controlled by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in cooperation with the Ministry of Environment. The support of public is provided in the cases in which queried entity tries not to give the requested information in the appropriate range. NGOs do not follow how the public is involved in the EIA process, and how the comments are relevant or incorporated and whether the final standpoint is influenced. This standpoint is not monitored by Czech Statistical Office. The article deals with the involvement of the general public in the EIA process of wind power plants in the Czech Republic. In selected regions (Moravskoslezský, Olomoucký, Ústecký and Jihomoravský), not only the quantity but also the relevance of the comments in relation to the outcome of the process are evaluated. The own typology groups of the public (individuals, petitions, self-government etc.) and also applying comments (noise, nature protection, administrative mistakes etc.) were used for the evaluation. All intentions obtained concurring standpoints in the case of zero or low interest of the public.

Keywords: Aarhus Convention, environmental impacts, wind energy, renewable sources
Grants and funding:

The paper was done within the project of Internal Grant Agency of Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies No. 16/2015 "The Chosen Environmental Tools as the Regional Development Factors".

Prepublished online: February 28, 2018; Published: September 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Schneider, J., Mudra, P., & Kozumplíková, A. (2018). Public Participation in the Process of EIA Intentions of Wind Power Plants in the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 66(1), 171-182. doi: 10.11118/actaun201866010171
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BILÍKOVÁ, P. 2015. The public participation in the process of EIA. Diploma Thesis. Brno: Mendel University in Brno.
    2. BUSH, D. and HOAGLAND, P. 2016. Public opinion and the environmental, economic and aesthetic impacts of offshore wind. Ocean & Coastal Management, 120: 70-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.11.018 Go to original source...
    3. CETKOVSKÝ, S, FRANTÁL, B., ŠTEKL, J. et al. (Eds.) 2010. Větrná energie v České republice: hodnocení prostorových vztahů, environmentálních aspektů a socioekonomických souvislostí. Studia Geographica 101. Brno: Ústav geoniky AV ČR.
    4. CHAVEZ, B. and BERNAL, A. 2008. Planning hydroelectric power plants with the public: a case of organizational and social learning in Mexico. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26(3): 163-76. DOI: 10.3152/146155108X363052 Go to original source...
    5. COOPER, L. and ELLIOTT, J. 2000. Public participation and social acceptability in the Philippine EIA process. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2(3): 339-67. DOI: 10.1142/S1464333200000400 Go to original source...
    6. ČEZ. 2013. Informace o větrné energetice. Skupina ČEZ. [Online]. Available at: http://www.cez.cz/cs/vyroba-elektriny/obnovitelne-zdroje/vitr/informace-o-vetrne-energetice.html [Accessed: 2015, November 10].
    7. ČSVE. 2014. Větrné elektrárny v ČR - akutální instalace. Česká společnost pro větrnou energii. [Online]. Available at: http://www.csve.cz/clanky/aktualni-instalace-WPPs-cr/120 [Accessed: 2015, November 10].
    8. DABBAGHIYAN, A., FAZELPOUR, F., ABNAVI, M. D. and ROSEN, M. A. 2015. Evaluation of wind energy potential in province of Bushehr, Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55(C): 455-466. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.148 Go to original source...
    9. DAI, K., BERGOT, A., XIANG, W.N., HUANG, H. and LIANG, C. 2014. Environmental issues associated with wind energy - A review. Renewable Energy, 75: 911-921. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.074 Go to original source...
    10. DEVLIN, J. F. and YAP, N. 2008. Contentious politics in environmental assessment: blocked projects and winning coalitions. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26(1):17-27. DOI: 10.3152/146155108X279939 Go to original source...
    11. DIDUCK, A. and MITCHELL, B. 2003. Learning, public involvement and environmental assessment: a Canadian case study. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 5(3): 339-64. DOI: 10.1142/S1464333203001401 Go to original source...
    12. DIETZ, T. and STERN, P.C. (Eds.). 2008. Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment and Decision Making. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
    13. DINCER, F. 2011. The analysis on wind energy electricity generation status, potential and policies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9): 5135-5142. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.042 Go to original source...
    14. DOELLE, M. and SINCLAIR, J. 2006. Time for a new approach to public participation in EA: promoting cooperation and consensus for sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26: 185-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.013 Go to original source...
    15. DVOŘÁK, L. 2005. Zákon o posuzování vlivů na životní prostředí s komentářem. Praha: ABF - Arch.
    16. EKOBONUS. 2011. Využití větrné energie v ČR: Dlouhá tradice, nejistá budoucnost. EkoBonus. [Online]. Available at: http://www.ekobonus.cz/vyuziti-vetrne-energie-v-cr-dlouha-tradice-nejista-budoucnost [Accessed: 2015, October 10].
    17. EMEJEAMARA, F. C., TOMLIN, A. S. and MILLWARD-HOPKINS, J. T. 2015. Urban wind: Characterisation of useful gust and energy capture. Renewable Energy, 81:162-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.03.028 Go to original source...
    18. ERU. 2015. Energetický regulační věstník. Praha: Energetický regulační úřad. Available at: http://www.eru.cz/documents/10540/1174016/ERV_6_2015/e64aff61-1df9-485e-b3fe-56bef976440b
    19. FRANTÁL, B. 2009. Větrná energie a její využití v České republice: regionálně-geografická perspektiva. Rigorosum Thesis. Brno: Masaryk University.
    20. GLUCKER, A. N., DRIESSEN, P. P., KOLHOFF, A., and RUNHAAR, H. A. 2013. Public participation in environmental impact assessment: why, who and how? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 43: 104-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.003 Go to original source...
    21. HANSLIAN, D., HOŠEK, J. and ŠTEKL, J. 2008. Odhad realizovatelného potenciálu větrné energie na území ČR. Praha: Ústav fyziky atmosféry AV ČR. Available at: http://www.ufa.cas.cz/files/OMET/potencial_ufa.pdf
    22. HARTLEY, N. and WOOD, CH. 2005. Public participation in environmental impact assessment: Implementing the Aarhus Convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(4):319-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.12.002 Go to original source...
    23. HATTAM, C., HOOPER, T. and PAPATHANASOPOULOU, E. 2017. A well-being framework for impact evaluation: The case of the UK offshore wind industry. Marine Policy, 78: 122-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.10.024 Go to original source...
    24. IAIA. 2006. Public participation. International Best Practice Principles. Special Publication Series. [Online]. Available at: http://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/SP4%20web.pdf [Accessed: 2015, November 3].
    25. KARYTSAS, S. and THEODOROPOULOU, H. 2014. Socioeconomic and demographic factors that influence publics' awareness on the different forms of renewable energy sources. Renewable Energy, 71(C): 480-485. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.059 Go to original source...
    26. LAWRENCE, D. P. 2003. Environmental impact assessment: practical solutions to recurrent problems. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons. Go to original source...
    27. LOCKIE, S., FRANETOVICH, M., SHARMA, S. and ROLFE, J. 2008. Democratisation versus engagement? Social and economic impact assessment and community participation in the coal mining industry of the Bowen Basin, Australia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26(3): 177-88. DOI: 10.3152/146155108X357257 Go to original source...
    28. MAYOUX, L. and CHAMBERS, R. 2005. Reversing the paradigm: quantification, participatory methods and pro-poor impact assessment. Journal of International Development, 17(2): 271-298. DOI: 10.1002/jid.1214 Go to original source...
    29. MICHALAK, P. and ZIMNY, J. 2011. Wind energy development in the world, Europe and Poland from 1995 to 2009: Current status and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(5): 2330-2341. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.008 Go to original source...
    30. MILLS, D. and ROSEN, H. 2006. New Jersey Shore Opinions about Off-shore Wind Turbines. Lieberman Research Group. Available at: https://dspace.njstatelib.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10929/24980/n2842006b.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    31. MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A. and EARLY, G. 2008. What is necessary to ensure natural justice in environmental impact assessment decision-making. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26(1): 29-42. DOI: 10.3152/146155108X303210 Go to original source...
    32. O'FAIRCHEALLAIGH, C. 2010. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental impact assessment review, 30(1): 19-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001 Go to original source...
    33. PORTMAN, M. 2009. Involving the public in the impact assessment of offshore renewable energy facilities. Marine Policy, 33(2): 332-338. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.07.014 Go to original source...
    34. REGA, C. and BALDIZZONE, G. 2015. Public participation in Strategic Environmental Assessment: A practitioners' perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50: 105-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.09.007 Go to original source...
    35. ŘÍHA, J. 2001. Posuzování vlivů na životní prostředí: metody pro předběžnou rozhodovací analýzu EIA. 1st Edition. Praha: Vydavatelství ČVUT.
    36. SALOMONS, G. H. and HOBERG, G. 2014. Setting boundaries of participation in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 45: 69-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.11.001 Go to original source...
    37. SESTO, E. and CASALE, C. 1998. Exploitation of wind as an energy source to meet the world's electricity demand. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 74-76(1 - 3): 375-387. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00034-8 Go to original source...
    38. STEWART, J. and SINCLAIR, A. 2007. Meaningful public participation in environmental assessment: Perspectives from Canadian participants, proponents and government. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 9(2): 161-183. DOI: 10.1142/S1464333207002743 Go to original source...
    39. TEISL, M. F., MCCOY, S., MARRINAN, S., NOBLET, C. L., JOHNSON, T., WIBBERLY, M. and KLEIN, S. 2014. Will offshore energy face "Fair winds and following seas"?: Understanding the factors influencing offshore wind acceptance. Estuaries and Coasts, 38(1): 1-8. Go to original source...
    40. ZHENG, CH. W., LI, C. Y., PAN, J. and XIA, L. L. 2015. An overview of global ocean wind energy resource evaluations. College of Meteorology and Oceanography. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53: 1240-1251. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.063 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content