Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2017, 65(5), 1793-1798 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201765051793

Land Tenure in Latin America: from Land Reforms to Counter-Movement to Neoliberalism

Eduardo von Bennewitz1,2
1 Department of Territorial Studies, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Zemìdìlská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2 Institute of Plant Production and Protection, Universidad Austral Chile, Campus Isla Teja, Valdivia, Chile

Latin America, with a Gini coefficient for land of 0.79, is the world's most unequal region in terms of land distribution. Land inequality is one of the greatest impediments to Latin American societies for achieving sustainable development and economic growth. Many studies have demonstrated how an unequal land concentration affects the quality of democracy and social cohesion and inhibits economic growth. Land is the main and in many cases the only asset for millions of rural households in the region and Land tenure can mean the difference between subsistence and extreme poverty. The present work reviews the agrarian reform processes that were experienced in part of Latin America and examines the impacts of the subsequent neoliberal reforms on land tenure, land and capital concentration. Finally it focuses on the need of a new distribution of land in order to achieve higher levels of Socio-Economic equality an also meet the Sustainable Development Goals in the region.

Keywords: land grabbing, land distribution, economic development, sustainable development

Published: October 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
von Bennewitz, E. (2017). Land Tenure in Latin America: from Land Reforms to Counter-Movement to Neoliberalism. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 65(5), 1793-1798. doi: 10.11118/actaun201765051793
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ALBERTUS, M., DIAZ-CAYEROS, A., MAGALONI, B. and WEINGAST, B. R. 2016. Authoritarian Survival and Poverty Traps: Land Reform in Mexico. World Development, 77: 154-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.013 Go to original source...
    2. BARRACLOUGH, S. L. 1999. Land Reform In Developing Countries: The Role Of The State And Other Actors. Discussion Paper No. 101, June 1999. [Online]. Available at: http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/9B503BAF4856E96980256B66003E0622/$file/dp101.pdf. [Accessed: 2017, February 2].
    3. BEEHNER, L. 2005. Land reform revisited. Council on Foregin Relations. [Online]. Available at: http://www.cfr.org/forests-and-land-management/land-reform-revisited/p9475. [Accessed: 2017, February 2].
    4. BELLISARIO, A. 2001. The Chilean Agrarian Transformation: Agrarian Reform and Capitalist 'Partial' Counter-Agrarian Reform. Journal of Agrarian Change, 7(1): 1-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2007.00138.x Go to original source...
    5. CHONCHOL, J. 2003. La Reforma Agraria en América Latina. In: Proceso Agrario En Bolivia Y América Latina, pp. 205-221. Available at: http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/Bolivia/cides-umsa/20120904012018/10reforma.pdf. [Accessed: 2017, February 2].
    6. COTULA, L., TOULMIN, C. and QUAN, J. 2006. Better land access for the rural poor: Lessons from experience and challenges ahead. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at: http://www.cpahq.org/cpahq/cpadocs/Better%20Land%20Access%20for%20the%20Rural%20Poor%20FAO.pdf. [Accessed: 2017, February 2].
    7. DEININGER, K. and SQUIRE, L. 1998. New ways of looking at old issues: inequality and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 57(2): 259 - 287. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00099-6 Go to original source...
    8. ECKSTEIN, S. D. 1978. Land reform in Latin America: Bolivia, Chile, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela. Staff working paper no. SWP 275. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1978/04/1555161/land-reform-latin-america-bolivia-chile-mexico-peru-venezuela. [Accessed: 2017, February 2].
    9. ECLAC. 2017. Economic and Social Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean. ECLAC Press.
    10. EGUREN, F. 2006. Reforma agraria y desarrollo en el Perú. In: EGUREN, F. (Ed.). Reforma agraria y desarrollo rural en la región andina. Lima: CEPES, pp. 11 - 31. Available at: http://www.ruralfinanceandinvestment.org/sites/default/files/1248203802936_01__eguren_peru.pdf. [Accessed: 2017, February 2].
    11. FAO. 2017. 2016: América Latina y el Caribe: Panorama de la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional. Santiago: FAO/OPS-OMS.
    12. GRIFFIN, K. et al. 2002. Poverty and the distribution of land. Journal of Agrarian Change, 2(3): 279-330. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0366.00036 Go to original source...
    13. JANVRY, A. DE and SADOULET, E. 2002. Land Reforms in Latin America: Ten Lessons toward a Contemporary Agenda. Prepared for World Bank Latin America Land Policy Workshop. Pachuca, Mexico, June 14th 2002. Available at: http://are.berkeley.edu/~esadoulet/papers/Land_Reform_in_LA_10_lesson.pdf [Accessed: 2017, February 2].
    14. KAY, C. 1997. Latin America's Exclusionary Rural Development in a Neo-Liberal World. Paper presented at Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA). Continental Plaza Hotel, Guadalajara, Mexico, April 17 - 19, 1997. Available at: http://lasa.international.pitt.edu/LASA97/kay.pdf [Accessed: 2017, February 2].
    15. KAY, C. 2002. Why East Asia Overtook Latin America: Agrarian Reform. Industrialization and Development, 23(6): 1073-1102. Go to original source...
    16. KAY, C. 2015. The agrarian question and the neoliberal rural transformation in Latin America. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 100: 73-83. Go to original source...
    17. OXFAM. 2016. Privilegios que niegan derechos: desigualdad extrema y secuestro de la democracia en América Latina y el Caribe. Oxfam. Available at: https://www.oxfam.org/es/informes/privilegios-que-niegan-derechos [Accessed: 2017, February 2].
    18. URIOSTE, M. and KAY, C. 2006. La reforma agraria inconclusa en el Oriente de Bolivia. In: EN EGUREN, F. (Ed). Reforma agraria y desarrollo rural en la región andina. Lima: CEPES, pp. 33 - 47. Available at: http://www.ruralfinanceandinvestment.org/sites/default/files/1248203896952_02__urioste_bolivia.pdf [Accessed: 2017, February 2].
    19. VELTMEYER, H. and PETRAS, J. 2008. Peasants in an Era of Neoliberal Globalization: Latin America on the move. Theomai: Estudios Sobre Sociedad, Naturaleza Y Desarrollo, 18: 4-29.
    20. VERGARA-CAMUS, L. 2014. Land and freedom: The MST, the Zapatistas and peasant alternatives to neoliberalism. London: Zed Books. Go to original source...
    21. VILLAGRA, L. (Ed). 2015. Neoliberalismo en america latina: Crisis, tendencias y alternativas. 1st Edition. Asunción: CLACSO. Available at: http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/clacso/gt/20151203044203/Neoliberalismo.pdf. [Accessed: 2017, February 2].
    22. VOLLRATH, D. 2004. "Land distribution and international agricultural productivity". American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(1): 202 - 216. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00973.x Go to original source...
    23. WIENER, E. 2011. La concentración de la propiedad de la tierra en América Latina : una aproximación a la problemática actual. Coalición Internacional para el Acceso a la Tierra. Available at: http://www.landcoalition.org/sites/default/files/documents/resources/LA_Regional_ESP_web_16.03.11.pdf [Accessed: 2017, February 2].

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content