Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2017, 65(5), 1655-1661 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201765051655

Assessment of Selected Equipment by Method FTA

Marián Bujna1, Petr Dostál2
1 Department of Quality and Engineering Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovak Republic
2 Department of technology and automobile transport, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 61300 Brno, Czech Republic

The aim of my research was to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate the potential risks on Extruder, detect the probability of occurrence and therefore take reformation measures for their elimination or minimization. Throughout the research, we focused on the process compounding and recycling of plastic waste, production stage of secondary processing with plastic waste. We have reviewed the extruder machine. First, we qualitative consider the device by constructing fault tree. First, we consider qualitative data of the device with constructing fault tree, Subsequently, we use quantitative analysis and we specify the probability of a negative phenomenon. The result is more accurate and objective determination of probability and risk itself. The result is more accurate and more objective determination of probability and the actual risk.

Keywords: qualitative analyse, quantitative analyse, fault tree, measures, extruder
Grants and funding:

Supported by the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic, project KEGA no. 035SPU-4/2014 'Integrating innovative trends in metal machining, metrology and quality management in university studies'. The research has been supported by the project TP 6/2017: Defectoscopic quality assessment of technical and organic materials; financed by IGA AF MENDELU.

Published: October 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bujna, M., & Dostál, P. (2017). Assessment of Selected Equipment by Method FTA. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis65(5), 1655-1661. doi: 10.11118/actaun201765051655
Download citation

References

  1. ANTUNES, R. and GONZALEZ, V. 2015. A Production Model for Construction: A Theoretical Framework. Buildings, 5(1): 209 - 228. DOI: 10.3390/buildings5010209 Go to original source...
  2. BUJNA, M. and BELOEV, C. I. 2015. Tools of risk management in production processes. 1st Edition Ruse: Angel Kanchev University of Ruse.
  3. BUJNA, M., KOTUS, M. and ČIČO, P. 2014. Manažérstvo rizika. 1st Edition. Nitra: Slovenská poľnohospodárska univerzita.
  4. BUJNA, M., PRÍSTAVKA, M., KORENKO, M. and KADNÁR, M. 2013. Safety audit in hatching company. Journal of Central European Agriculture. Zagreb : University of Zagreb, 14(4): 1287 - 1297. Go to original source...
  5. HUBBARD, D. 2009. The Failure of Risk Management: Why It's Broken and How to Fix It. John Wiley & Sons.
  6. JANKAJOVÁ, E., KOTUS, M., HOLOTA, T. and ZACH, M. 2016. Risk assessment of handling loads in production process. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(2), 449 - 453. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664020449 Go to original source...
  7. KAPLÍK, P., PRÍSTAVKA, M., BUJNA, M. and VIDERŇAN, J. 2013. Use of 8D method to solve problems. Advanced Materials Research, 801(special iss.): 95 - 101. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.801.95 Go to original source...
  8. KORENKO, M., BUJNA, M., FÖLDEŠIOVÁ, D., DOSTÁL, P. and KYSELICA, P. 2015. Risk analysis at work in manufacturing organization. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(5): 1493 - 1497. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563051493 Go to original source...
  9. KORENKO, M., FÖLDEŠIOVÁ, D. and BELOEV, C. I. 2015. Risk assessment in quality management. 1st Edition. Ruse: Angel Kanchev University of Ruse.
  10. KORENKO, M., PRÍSTAVKA, M. and DRLIČKA, R. 2015. Manažérstvo kvality procesov. 1st Edition. Nitra: Slovenská poľnohospodárska univerzita.
  11. KOTUS, M., JANKAJOVÁ, E., LESTYÁNSZKA ŠKŮRKOVÁ, K. and ZACH, M. 2016. Safety audit of band saw in manufacturing organization. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(2): 467 - 471. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664020467 Go to original source...
  12. LESTYANSZKÁ ŠKŮRKOVÁ, K. and KUDIČOVÁ, J. 2015. Study of injection process capability in production of plastic boxes. Acta technologica agriculturae, 18(2): 54 - 56. DOI: 10.1515/ata-2015-0012 Go to original source...
  13. MATÚŠ, M. 2016 Aplikovanie metódy stromu porúch (FTA). TF-5671-41244. Nitra: SUA in Nitra.
  14. POLÁK, P., DRLIČKA, R. and ŽITŇANSKÝ, J. 2014. Capability assessment of measuring equipment using statistic method. Management systems in production engineering, 4(16): 184 - 186.
  15. PRÍSTAVKA, M. and BELOEV, C. I. 2015. Engineering of products quality. 1st Edition. Ruse: University "Angel Kanchev" of Ruse.
  16. PRÍSTAVKA, M., BELOEV, C. I. and KROČKO, V. 2014. Quality control in production processes. 1st Edition. Ruse: Angel Kanchev University of Ruse.
  17. VESELY, B. 2002. Fault Tree Analysis (FTA): Concepts and Applications. Version 1.1, NASA Publication. USA: NASA.
  18. VIRČÍKOVÁ, E. and ŠOLC, M. 2012. Integrované manažérske systémy. 2nd Edition. Košice: Technická univerzita v Košiciach.
  19. ŽITŇÁK, M., KOLLÁROVÁ, K., MACÁK, M., PRÍSTAVKOVÁ, M. and BOŠANSKÝ, M. 2015. Assessment of risks in the field of safety, quality and environment in post-harvest line. Research in agricultural engineering, 61: S26 - S36. DOI: 10.17221/23/2015-RAE Go to original source...
  20. ŽITŇÁK, M., MACÁK, M. anf KORENKO, M. 2014. Assessment of risks in implementing automated satellite navigation systems. Research in agricultural engineering, 60: S16 - S24. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.