Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2017, 65(3), 1015-1022 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201765031015

Modelling Counterparty Credit Risk in Czech Interest Rate Swaps

Lenka Křivánková1, Silvie Zlatoąová2
1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, the Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, ®erotínovo náměstí 617/9, 601 77 Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Finance, the Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, ®erotínovo náměstí 617/9, 601 77 Brno, Czech Republic

According to the Basel Committee's estimate, three quarters of counterparty credit risk losses during the financial crisis in 2008 originate from credit valuation adjustment's losses and not from actual defaults. Therefore, from 2015, the Third Basel Accord (EU, 2013a) and (EU, 2013b) instructed banks to calculate the capital requirement for the risk of credit valuation adjustment (CVA). Banks are trying to model CVA to hold the prescribed standards and also reach the lowest possible impact on their profit. In this paper, we try to model CVA using methods that are in compliance with the prescribed standards and also achieve the smallest possible impact on the bank's earnings. To do so, a data set of interest rate swaps from 2015 is used. The interest rate term structure is simulated using the Hull-White one-factor model and Monte Carlo methods. Then, the probability of default for each counterparty is constructed. A safe level of CVA is reached in spite of the calculated the CVA achieving a lower level than CVA previously used by the bank. This allows a reduction of capital requirements for banks.

Keywords: counterparty credit risk, credit valuation adjustment, probability of default, interest rate swaps, yield curve, Hull-White model, Monte Carlo simulations, credit exposure

Prepublished online: July 3, 2017; Published: May 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Křivánková, L., & Zlatoąová, S. (2017). Modelling Counterparty Credit Risk in Czech Interest Rate Swaps. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis65(3), 1015-1022. doi: 10.11118/actaun201765031015
Download citation

References

  1. ARORA, N., GANDHI, P. and LONGSTAFF, F. A. 2012. Counterparty credit risk and the credit default swap market. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(2): 280 - 293. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.10.001 Go to original source...
  2. BRIGO, D. and MERCURIO, F. 2007. Interest rate models-theory and practice: with smile, inflation and credit. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
  3. CANABARRO, E. and DUFFIE, D. 2003. Measuring and marking counterparty risk. In: Asset/Liability Management for Financial Institutions, Institutional Investor Books. Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC. [Online]. Available at: http://www.darrellduffie.com/uploads/surveys/duffiecanabarro2004.pdf [Accessed: 2016, November 10].
  4. ČESKÁ NÁRODNÍ BANKA. © 2003 - 2017. Sazby PRIBOR - roční historie. ČNB. [Online]. Available at: https://www.cnb.cz/cs/financni_trhy/penezni_trh/pribor/rok_form.jsp [Accessed: 2015, November 30].
  5. EU. 2013a. Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC Text with EEA relevance. Brussels: European Commission.
  6. EU. 2013b. Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 Text with EEA relevance. Brussels: European Commission.
  7. EUROPEAN BANKING AUTHORITY. Article 161. Interactive Single Rulebook. [Online]. Available at: https://www.eba.europa.eu/regulation-and-policy/single-rulebook/interactive-single-rulebook/-/interactive-single-rulebook/article-id/1598. [Accessed: 2016, December 11]
  8. GREGORY, J. 2010. Counterparty credit risk: the new challenge for global financial markets. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
  9. HAMMERSLEY, J. 2013. Monte carlo methods. London: Chapman and Hall.
  10. HULL, J. and WHITE, A. 1990. Pricing interest-rate-derivative securities. Review of financial studies, 3(4): 573 - 592. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/3.4.573 Go to original source...
  11. HULL, J. and WHITE, A. 2001. The general hull-white model and supercalibration. Financial Analysts Journal, 57(6): 34 - 43. DOI: 10.2469/faj.v57.n6.2491 Go to original source...
  12. HULL, J. and WHITE, A. 2012. CVA and wrong-way risk. Financial Analysts Journal, 68(5): 58 - 69. DOI: 10.2469/faj.v68.n5.6 Go to original source...
  13. IFSR. 2011. IFRS 13: Fair Value Measurement. [Online]. Available at: http://www.ifrs.org/IFRSs/Pages/IFRS.aspx [Accessed: 2016, December 11].
  14. PATRIA ONLINE. © 1997 - 2017. IRS Sazby historie - CZK. Patria Online. [Online] Available at: https://www.patria.cz/kurzy/historie/sazby.html. [Accessed: 2015, October 30]
  15. PYKHTIN, M. and ROSEN, D. 2010. Pricing counterparty risk at the trade level and CVA allocations. Journal of Credit Risk, 6(4): 3 - 38. DOI: 10.21314/JCR.2010.116 Go to original source...
  16. PYKHTIN, M. and ZHU, S. H. 2007. A guide to modeling counterparty credit risk. GARP Risk Review, 37: 16 - 22.
  17. RUBINSTEIN, R. Y. and KROESE, D. P. 2011. Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  18. ©EVCOVIC, D., STEHLIKOVÁ, B. and MIKULA, K. 2011 Analytical and numerical methods for pricing financial derivatives. New York: Nova Science Pub. Inc.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.