Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2017, 65(3), 799-806 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201765030799

Effect of Localities and organic Fertilizers on Yield in Conditions of Organic Farming

Jiri Antosovsky1, Pavel Ryant1, Martin Prudil2, Milan Gruber2, Ivana Komprsová2
1 Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2 Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture, Hroznová 2, 656 06 Brno, Czech Republic

Nitrogen fertilization cannot be used by actual needs of plants during vegetation in organic farming. The proper crop rotation and harmonic nutrition are necessary for good and quality products. The methods of treatment are mainly realized by cultivation of green manure crop and fertilizing by organic fertilizers. The aim of the long-term experiment was to evaluate the effect of different localities and different organic fertilizers on crop yield in organic farming. Variants of fertilization included in the experiment are: 1. Unfertilized control, 2. Green manure, 3. Green manure + renewable external sources, 4. Green manure + renewable external sources + auxiliary substances, 5. Green manure + farm fertilizers, 6. Green manure + farm fertilizers + auxiliary substances. The experiment started by sowing of winter wheat so green manure crop was not grown in the first experimental year. The highest yield of winter wheat grain coming from the first year of the experiment was observed on the variant with renewable external sources (digestate). Average grain yield on this variant was about 7.12 t/ha (up to 0.74 t/ha increased than the unfertilized control). Average yield of potatoes from the second year of the experiment was the highest after combination with green manure + renewable external sources (compost + digestate) + auxiliary substances. This variant achieved yield about 34.08 t/ha, which is increased by 9.35 t/ha compared to the control variant. Results from this two-year experiment showed that the most suitable combination of fertilization with or without green manure crop is compost + digestate. These results were probably caused by higher content of nitrogen in organic fertilizers (compost + digestate) used in this variant compared to other variants. Statistical difference of achieved yields was observed between each experimental station in both experimental years.

Keywords: organic farming, organic fertilization, yield, winter wheat, potatoes
Grants and funding:

The research was financially supported by IGA FA MENDELU grant, no. IP_060/2016.

Prepublished online: July 3, 2017; Published: May 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Antosovsky, J., Ryant, P., Prudil, M., Gruber, M., & Komprsová, I. (2017). Effect of Localities and organic Fertilizers on Yield in Conditions of Organic Farming. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis65(3), 799-806. doi: 10.11118/actaun201765030799
Download citation

References

  1. BARKER, V. A. 2010. Science and Technology of Organic Farming. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis Group with CRC Press.
  2. CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE. 2016a. Final harvest figures - 2015. Czech Statistical Office. [Online]. Available at: https https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/final-harvest-figures-2015. [Accessed: 2016, November 11].
  3. CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE. 2016b. Harvest forecast - September 2016. Czech Statistical Office. [Online]. Available at: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/ari/harvest-forecast-september-2016. [Accessed: 2016, November 11].
  4. DVORSKÝ, J. and URBAN, J. 2014. Basic of organic farming according to Council Regulation (ES) nb.834/2007 and Commission regulation (ES) č.889/2008 with esxamples [in Czech: Základy ekologického zemědělství podle nařízení Rady (ES) č. 834/2007 a nařízení Komise (ES) č. 889/2008 s příklady]. 2nd Edition. Brno: Central institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture.
  5. EL-SAYED, S. F., HASSAN, H. A. and EL-MOGY, M. M. 2015. Impact of bio- and organic fertilizers on potato yield, quality and tuber weight loss, after harvest. Potato Research, 58(1): 67-81. DOI: 10.1007/s11540-014-9272-2 Go to original source...
  6. FLIESS, A., OBERHOLZER, H. R., GUNST, L. and MAEDER, P. 2007. Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21 years if irganic and conventional fading. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Enviroment, 118: 273-284. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.022 Go to original source...
  7. GALE, E. S., SULLIVAN, D. M., COGGER, C. G., BARY, A. I., HEMPHILL, D. D. and MYHRE, E.A. 2006. Estimating plant-available nitrogen release from manure, composts, and speciality products. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35(6): 2321-2332. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0062 Go to original source...
  8. LARNEY, F. J., BUCKEY, K. E., HAO, X. and MCGAUGHEY, P.W. 2006. Fresh, stockpiled and composted beef cattle manure: Nutrient levels and mass balance estimates in Alberta and Manitoba. Journal of Environmental Quality. 35(5): 1844-1854. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0440 Go to original source...
  9. LOECKE, T. D., CAMBARDELLA, C. A. and LIEBMAN, M. 2012. Synchrony of net nitrogen mineralization and maize nitrogen uptake following applications of composted and fresh swine manure in Midwest US. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystem, 93(1): 65-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10705-012-9500-6 Go to original source...
  10. MAEDER, P., FLIESSBACH, A., DUBOIS, D., GUNST, L., FRIED, P. and NIGGILI, U. 2002. Soild Fertility and Biodivertsity in Organic Farming and Biodiversity in Organic Farming. Science 31, 296: 1694-1697. DOI: 10.1126/science.1071148 Go to original source...
  11. MAHIMARAJA, S., BOLAN, N. S., HEDLEY, M. J. and MACGREGOR, M. A. 1994. Loses and transformation of nitrogen during composting of poultry manure with different amendments: An incubation experiment. Bioresource Technology, 47(2): 65-273. Go to original source...
  12. MAKAREWICZ, A., PLAZA, A. and GASIOROWSKA, B. 2015. Yield and quality of potato tubers fertilized with undersonw crops in an intergrated and organic production system. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum - Agriculture, 14(4): 39-48.
  13. MILLER, J. J., BEASLEY, B., DRURY, C. F. and ZEBARTH, B. J. 2009. Barley yield and nutrient uptake for soil amended with fresh and composted cattle manure. Agronomy Journal, 101: 1047-1059. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2009.0057 Go to original source...
  14. MOLLER, K. and MULLER, T. 2012. Effect of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review. Engineering in Life Sciences, 12(3): 242-257. DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201100085 Go to original source...
  15. PLAZA, A., GASIOROWSKA, B., MAKAREWICZ, A. and KROLOKOWSKA, M. A. 2013. The yielding of potato fertilized with undersown crops in integrated and organic production system. Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization, 267: 71-78.
  16. RIEUX, C. M., VANASSE, A., CHANTIGNY, M. H., GELINAS, P., ANGERS, D.A., ROCHETTE, P. and ROYER, I. 2013. Yield and bread-making potential of spring wheat under mineral and organic fertilization. Crop Science, 53(3): 1139-1147. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2012.07.0448 Go to original source...
  17. SMATANOVÁ, M. 2012. Digestate used as organic fertilizers [in Czech: Digestát jako organické hnojivo]. Farmer, 18: 21-22. Available at: http://eagri.cz/public/web/file/233740/Digestat_jako_organicke_hnojivo.pdf. [Accessed: 2016, NOVEMBER 11].
  18. URBAN, J. and ŠARAPATKA, B. 2003. Organic farming [in Czech: Ekologické zemědělství]. 1st Edition. Praha: Ministry of Environment in cooperation with PRO-BIO Association of Organic Farmers.
  19. ZBÍRAL, J. et al. 2004. Analysis of soil III - Unified techniques [in Czech: Analýza půd III - jednotné pracovní postupy]. 2nd Edition. Brno: Central institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.