Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2016, 64(6), 2151-2160 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664062151

The Role of Cultural Activities in Community Development

Baiba Tjarve, Ieva Zemīte
Latvian Academy of Culture, Ludzas 24, Riga, LV 1003, Latvia

Culture has a critical role in transforming localities into more attractive places to work and invest. Cultural activities and facilities significantly affect the development of the physical environment of cities. But what does it all mean for the local residents of the neighbourhoods? How do they feel or participate in cultural activities organized for them?
The overall aim of this study has been to evaluate participation effect on the development of Riga's neighbourhoods during the year of The European Capital of Culture.
During the research, the authors have used the mixed research methodology. The qualitative analysis of the Riga 2014 programme has been done based on the qualitative interviews with the artistic team, project managers and entrepreneurs from Riga's neighbourhoods; besides, a detailed analysis of Riga 2014 programme events has been performed.
The main findings show that cultural life in the neighbourhoods is among the most important factors determining the satisfaction with life by the neighbourhoods' inhabitants. Personalities, not infrastructure have a crucial importance in the development of neighbourhood cultural life. Cultural activities in neighbourhood should be carried out in close cooperation with the stakeholders from different sectors. This can bring to sustainable and long-term effects.

Keywords: urban regeneration, development of neighbourhoods, cultural participation

Prepublished online: December 21, 2016; Published: January 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tjarve, B., & Zemīte, I. (2016). The Role of Cultural Activities in Community Development. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis64(6), 2151-2160. doi: 10.11118/actaun201664062151
Download citation

References

  1. BARKER, C. 2012. Cultural studies: theory and practice. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  2. BIANCHINI, F. 1999. Cultural Processes and urban sustainability. [Online]. Available at: http://www.brusselskunstenoverleg.be/nl/documentatie/cultural-planning-urban-sustainability [Accessed: 2016, January 30].
  3. BIANCHINI, F. 1993. Remaking European cities: the role of cultural policies. Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: the West European Experience. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  4. BIANCHINI, F., TORRIGIANI, M. 1995. Concepts and Projects around Culture and Neighbourhoods. Culture and neighbourhoods, 1: 13-39.
  5. CRONQVIST, L. 2011. Tosmana: Tool for Small-N Analysis [Computer Programme], Version 1.3.2.0. Trier: University of Trier.
  6. ESTONIAN MINISTRY OF CULTURE. 2010. Creative Industries in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania 2010. [Online]. Available at: http://www.esa.ee/cms-data/upload/files/CreativeIndustries_EstLatLit.pdf. [Accessed: 2015, April 30].
  7. FLORIDA, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class. And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.
  8. FLORIDA, R. 2008. Who's your city? How the Creative Economy is Making Where to Live the Most Important Decision of Your Life. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.
  9. FLORIDA, R. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class. Urban sociology reader. Oxon: Routledge.
  10. HOSPERS, G. J., VAN DAM, R. 2005. How to create a creative city? The viewpoints of Richard Florida and Jane Jacobs. The Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, 7(4): 8-12. Go to original source...
  11. FORCE MAJEURE: THE APPLICATION OF RIGA FOR THE TITLE OF THE EUROPEAN CAPITAL OF CULTURE 2014. 2008. [Online]. Available at: http://riga2014.org/files/pdf/gramata/ekg_book_2009_full_eng_publish.pdf. [Accessed: 2015, April 30].
  12. ENNIS, N., DOUGLASS, G. 2011. Culture and regeneration - What evidence is there of a link and how could it be measured. [Online]. GLA Economics. Available at: http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/wp-48_0.pdf [Accessed: 2015, April 30].
  13. HAHN, J. 2010. Creative Cities and (Un)Sustainability - Cultural perspectives. Cultura21: eBooks Series on Culture and Sustainability.
  14. JACOBS, J. 2004. Dark Age Ahead. Toronto: Random House of Canada.
  15. KEA. 2015. Smart Guide to Creative Spillovers: To assist cities implementing creative spill-overs. [Online]. Available at: http://www.keanet.eu/wp-content/uploads/SMARTGUIDE-FINAL-PDF.pdf?4f4eb7. [Accessed: 2015, April 30].
  16. LANDRY, C. 2008. The Creative City. A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. 2nd. Edition. Near Stroud: Comedia.
  17. LANDRY, C., BIANCHINI, F. 1995. The Creative City. London: Demos.
  18. MATARASSO, F. 1997. Use or Ornament? The Social Impact of Participation in the Arts. Comedia.
  19. MAHONEY, J., GOERTZ, G. 2006. A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14(3): 227-249. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpj017 Go to original source...
  20. PALMER-RAE ASSOCIATES. 2004. European Cities and Capitals of Culture: Study Prepared for the European Commission. Part I. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/creative-europe/actions/documents/ecoc/cap-part1_en.pdf. [Accessed: 2015, April 30].
  21. RECKWITZ, A. 2009. Die Selbstkultivierung der Stadt. Zur Transformation moderner Urbanität in der 'creative city'. Mittelweg, 36(18): 2-34.
  22. RICHARDS, G., PALMER, R. 2010. Eventful cities. Cultural management and urban revitalization. Amsterdam, London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  23. RIHOUX, B., RAGIN C.C. 2009. Introduction. In: Rihoux B and Ragin CC, eds. Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Los Angeles: Sage. 17-25. Go to original source...
  24. VICKERY, J. 2007. The emergence of culture-led regeneration: a policy concept and its discontents. Warwick: Centre for cultural policy studies.
  25. WAGEMANN, C., SCHNEIDER, C., Q. 2010. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets: Agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique. Comparative Sociology, 9(3): 376-396. DOI: 10.1163/156913210X12493538729838 Go to original source...
  26. ZUKIN, S. 2005. Whose Culture? Whose City? The urban sociology reader. Oxon: Routledge.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.