Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2016, 64(6), 2117-2122 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664062117

Foreign Direct Investment Stock and Business Cycle Synchronization: the Case of Central European Economies

Marcel ©evela
Department of Business Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemìdìlská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The business cycle synchronization was widely discussed before the last economic crisis and now the interest in this topic revives. The majority of literature about business cycle synchronization evaluates the role of mutual trade and similarities among the economies, while the investment links, mainly foreign direct investment flows and stocks are very often completely ignored or at least marginalized. The paper aims to discuss and then estimate the importance of continually increasing stock of foreign direct investment in synchronization of business cycles. It focuses to selected Central European economies after economic transition and their business cycle co-movements with their most important trade partners - France, Germany and Italy. The extent of trade flows, industrial structure similarity and selected trade environment variables are used to extend the standardly employed regression formula.

Keywords: business cycle synchronisation, foreign direct investment stock, foreign trade, product structure, transition countries, trade distance, panel data

Prepublished online: December 21, 2016; Published: January 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
©evela, M. (2016). Foreign Direct Investment Stock and Business Cycle Synchronization: the Case of Central European Economies. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis64(6), 2117-2122. doi: 10.11118/actaun201664062117
Download citation

References

  1. BALTAGI, B. 2008. Economic Analysis of Panel Data. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. BAYOUMI, T. and EICHENGREEN, B. 1996. Operationalizing the theory of Optimum Currency Areas. CEDR Discussion Paper, no. 1484.
  3. BAXTER, M. and KOUPARITSAS, M. A. 2005. Determinants of business cycle comovements: a robust analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52: 113-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2004.08.002 Go to original source...
  4. BOONE, L. and MAUREL, M. 1998. Economic Convergence of the CEECs with the EU. CEPR Discussion Paper, no. 2018.
  5. CROSBY, M. 2003. Business cycle correlation in Asia-Pacific. Economics Letters, 80: 35-44. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00042-9 Go to original source...
  6. DE GRAUWE, P. 2014. The Economics of Monetary Integration. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press.
  7. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2001. Real Convergence in Candidate Countries - Past Performance and Scenarios in the Pre-accession Economic Programmes. Executive Summary by Commission Services.
  8. FRANKEL, J. A. and ROSE, A. K. 1998. The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria. Economic journal, 108: 1009-1025 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0297.00327 Go to original source...
  9. GREENE, W. H. 2012. Econometric analysis. Boston: Pearson.
  10. HSU, C. C., WU, J. Y. and YAU, R. 2011. Foreign Trade Investment and business cycle co-movements: The panel data Evidence. Journal of Macroeconomics, 33: 770-783. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2011.06.001 Go to original source...
  11. IMBS, J. 2004. Trade, finance, specialisation and synchronization. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(3): 723-734. DOI: 10.1162/0034653041811707 Go to original source...
  12. INKLAAR, R., JONG, R. and HAAN, J. 2008. Trade and business cycle synchronization in OECD countries - a re-examination. European Economic Review, 52: 646-666. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.05.003 Go to original source...
  13. ISHYAMA, Y. 1975. The theory of Optimum Currency Areas: A Survey. IMF Staff Paper, no. 22. Go to original source...
  14. JANSEN, J. and STOKMAN, A. 2004. Foreign Direct Investment and International Business Cycle Comovement. ECB Working Paper No. 401, October 2004. Go to original source...
  15. JANSEN, J. and STOKMAN, A. 2011. International Business Cycle Comovement: Trade and Foreign Direct Investment. DNB Working Paper No. 319, September 2011. Go to original source...
  16. KENEN, P. 1969. The Theory of Optimum Currency Areas: An Eclectic View. In: MUNDEL R. and SWOBODA, A. (eds.) Monetary Problems of the International Economy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 41-60.
  17. MCKINNON, R. I. 1963. Optimum Currency Areas. American Economic Review, 53: 717-724.
  18. KRUGMAN, P. 1994. International Economics: Theory and Policy. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
  19. MUNDEL, R. 1961. A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas. American Economic Review, 51: 509-517.
  20. SCHIAVO, S. 2008. Financial integration, GDP correlation and the endogeneity of optimum currency areas. Economica, 75: 165-189. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.