Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2016, 64(6), 2081-2086 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664062081

The Shadow Economy of Czech Republic and Tax Evasion: The Currency Demand Approach

Dennis Nchor, Tomáš Konderla
Department of Statistics and Operations Analysis, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

This study investigates the shadow economy of Czech Republic and the associated losses in tax revenue. The presence of a shadow economy may not necessarily be bad for the economies in which they prevail but they could cause huge losses to government revenue and could also constitute serious violation of labour regulations. The study uses the Currency Demand Approach. It measures the size of the shadow economy in two stages: a) the econometric estimation of an aggregate money demand equation b) the calculation of the value of the shadow economy through the quantity theory of money. The key variables in the study include: the total currency held outside the banking system, the number of automatic teller machines, the deposit interest rate, GDP deflator, the average tax, velocity of money, nominal GDP and nominal money supply. The results from the study show that the shadow economy of Czech Republic on the average is about 20.9 % as at the end of 2013 and the country loses an average tax revenue of about 7.2 % of GDP yearly. The data was obtained from the World Bank country indicators and the International Financial Statistics.

Keywords: shadow economy, currency demand, quantity theory of money, tax evasion

Prepublished online: December 21, 2016; Published: January 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nchor, D., & Konderla, T. (2016). The Shadow Economy of Czech Republic and Tax Evasion: The Currency Demand Approach. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(6), 2081-2086. doi: 10.11118/actaun201664062081
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BARRO, R. J. 1997. Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    2. CAGAN, P. 1958. The demand for currency relative to the total money supply. Journal of Polititical Economy, 66(3): 302-328. Go to original source...
    3. CAPPIELLO, M. A. 1986. Proposita di bibliografia ragionata sull'economia sommersa nell'industria. In: BAGNASCO, A. (ed.), L'altra metè dell'economia, La ricerca internazionale sull'economia informale. Naples: Liguori, 307-345.
    4. ECONOMY WATCH. 2015. Czech Republic Economic Statistics and Indicators. [Online]. Available at: http://www.economywatch.com/economicstatistics/Czech-Republic/Business_Freedom. [Accessed: 2015]
    5. FAAL, E. 2003. Currency demand the underground economy and tax evasion: the case of. IMF Working Paper, Western Hemisphere Department.
    6. FERWERDA, J., DELEANU, I. and UNGER, B. 2010. Revaluating the Tanzi-model to estimate the underground economy. Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute Discussion Paper 10-04. Utrecht School of Economics.
    7. FISHER, I. 1911. The purchasing power of money. New York: MacMillan.
    8. FREY, L. 1972. Il lavoro a domicilio in Lombardia. Giunta Regionale Lombarda. Assessorato al Lavoro, Milan.
    9. FREY, L. 1980. Introduzione all'analisi economica del lavoro minorile. Economia del Lavoro, 2: 5-16.
    10. FRIEDMAN, M. 1956. The Quantity Theory of Money - A Restatement. In: Friedman, M. (ed.). Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 3-21.
    11. FRIEDMAN, M. 1968. The role of monetary policy. Am. Econ. Rev, 58(1): 1-17. Go to original source...
    12. FRIEDMAN, M. and SCHWARTZ, A. J. 1963. A monetary history of the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
    13. HUME, D. 1955. Of money, 1752. In: E. Rotwein (ed.), David Hume - Writings on Economics. London.
    14. JOHNSON, S., KAUFMANN, D. and ZOIDO-LOBATÓN, P. 1998. Corruption, public finances and the unofficial economy. Discussion paper. Washington, D.C: The World Bank. Go to original source...
    15. JOHNSON, S., KAUFMANN, D. and ZOIDO-LOBATÓN, P. 1998. Regulatory discretion and the unofficial economy. Am. Econ. Rev., 88(2): 387-392.
    16. KWIATKOWSKI, D., PHILLIPS, P.C.B., SCHMIDT, P. and SHIN, Y. 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Economics, (54): 159-178. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y Go to original source...
    17. LEMIEUX, T., FORTIN, B. and PIERRE, F. 1994. The effect of taxes on labour supply in the underground economy. Am. Econ. Rev., 84(1): 231-254.
    18. LUBELL, H. 1991. The informal sector in the 1980's and 1990's. Paris: OECD.
    19. MANKIW, N. G. 2000. Macroeconomics. New York: Worth Publishers.
    20. MLODKOWSKI, P. 2007. Convergence in monetary policy stance during pre-EMU period case of Czech Republic and Poland. In: POLOUCEK, S. and STAVAREK, D. (eds.), Future of the European Monetary Integration. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Finance and Banking. Karviná: Silesian University, 558-571.
    21. POZO, S. 1996. Exploring the underground economy: studies of illegal and unreported activity. Michigan: W.E. Upjohn, Institute for Employment Research. Go to original source...
    22. SCHNEIDER, F. 1994. Can the shadow economy be reduced through major tax reforms? An empirical investigation for Austria. Supplement to Public Finance / Finances Publiques, 49: 137-152.
    23. SCHNEIDER, F. 2000. The increase of the size of the shadow economy of 18 OECD countries: some preliminary explanations. Paper presented at the Annual Public Choice Meeting, March 10-12. Charleston, S.C. Go to original source...
    24. SCHNEIDER, F. 2005. Shadow economies around the world: what do we really know. Journal of Political Economy, 21(3): 598-642. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.10.002 Go to original source...
    25. SCHNEIDER, F. 2007. Reducing the shadow economy in Germany: a blessing or a curse? Discussion paper. Linz: Department of Economics, University of Linz.
    26. SCHNEIDER, F. 2013. Work in the shadow: some facts. Economics working papers. Linz: Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University.
    27. SCHNEIDER, F., BUEHN, A. and MONTENEGRO, C. E. 2010. New estimates for the shadow economies all over the world. Intern. Journal of Economics, 24(4): 443-461. Go to original source...
    28. SCHNEIDER, F. and ENSTE, D. H. 2000. Shadow economies: size, causes, and consequences, scand. Journal of Political Economy, 88(4): 643-668. Go to original source...
    29. SCHNEIDER, F. and ENSTE, D. H. 2000. Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences, The Journal of Economy, 38(1): 77-114. Go to original source...
    30. SCHNEIDER, F. and ENSTE, D. H. 2002. The Shadow economy: theoretical approaches, empirical studies, and political implications. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
    31. SCHNEIDER, F. and KLINGLMAIR, R. 2004. Shadow economies around the world: what do we know? Institute for the Study of Labour (IZA), working paper No. 1043. Go to original source...
    32. TANZI, V. 1980. The underground economy in the United States: estimates and implications. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 135(4): 427 -453.
    33. TANZI, V. 1983. The underground economy in the United States: annual estimates, 1930-1980. IMF-Staff Papers, 30(2): 283-305. DOI: 10.2307/3867001 Go to original source...
    34. TANZI, Z. 1999. Uses and abuses of estimates of the underground economy. Journal of Economics, 109(456): 338-340. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0297.00437 Go to original source...
    35. ZÍDKOVÁ, H. 2012. Diskuze k metodám odhadu stínové ekonomiky. Acta Oeconomica Pragensia: vědecký časopis Vysoké školy ekonomické, 20(6): 3-17. DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.384 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content